Courseiva
Process — Managing Technical AspectseasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

PMP Process — Managing Technical Aspects Practice Question

The project team is in the process of identifying risks. Which tool or technique should the project manager use to identify risks?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Brainstorming

Brainstorming is a common technique for risk identification. Options A, B, and D are used in other processes.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Quality audits

    Why it's wrong here

    Quality audits are structured, independent reviews conducted to determine if project activities comply with organizational and project policies, processes, and procedures. They are a tool and technique primarily used in the "Manage Quality" process to ensure adherence to quality standards and identify process improvements. While they contribute to overall project health, quality audits are not a method for proactively identifying potential future uncertainties or new risks that could impact project objectives across all dimensions.

  • Earned value management

    Why it's wrong here

    Earned Value Management (EVM) is a comprehensive project performance measurement methodology that integrates scope, schedule, and cost baselines to objectively assess project progress. It calculates key metrics such as Cost Variance (CV), Schedule Variance (SV), and Cost Performance Index (CPI) to provide insights into current project status and forecast future performance. Although EVM results might indicate existing performance issues that could signal a risk, it is not a technique used to proactively identify new, potential risks at the initial stages or during ongoing risk identification efforts.

  • Brainstorming

    Why this is correct

    Brainstorming is a highly effective data gathering technique where a group of project stakeholders, often including subject matter experts, collaboratively generates a comprehensive list of ideas or solutions related to a specific topic. In the context of risk management, brainstorming sessions are instrumental for identifying potential project risks by encouraging free-flowing thought and diverse perspectives. This collaborative approach helps uncover a broad range of uncertainties, both threats and opportunities, that might not be apparent to individuals working in isolation, making it a core technique for the "Identify Risks" process.

  • Critical path method

    Why it's wrong here

    The Critical Path Method (CPM) is a schedule network analysis technique used to determine the longest path through the project network diagram, which represents the minimum total project duration. It identifies critical activities that, if delayed, will directly delay the entire project completion. While understanding the critical path is essential for managing schedule risks and prioritizing activities, CPM itself is a tool for schedule development and analysis, not a technique for proactively identifying new, unforeseen risks across all project dimensions like scope, cost, or quality.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every PMP question from scratch — 800 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.