Question 675 of 892
Process — Managing Technical AspectsmediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is to facilitate a meeting between the product owner and the team to discuss velocity and sustainable pace, and to involve the team in estimating and planning. This is correct because Scrum emphasizes that velocity is a measure of the team’s actual capacity, not a target to be externally imposed; pressuring the team undermines the empirical process and leads to technical debt and burnout. On the PMP exam, this scenario tests your understanding of the Agile principle of sustainable development and the project manager’s role as a servant leader who protects the team from unrealistic demands. A common trap is choosing to simply “reassign the product owner” or “add more resources,” which ignores the root cause of misaligned expectations. Remember the mnemonic “V.E.T.” — Velocity is an Estimate, not a Target — to recall that the team must own their commitments.

PMP Process — Managing Technical Aspects Practice Question

This PMP practice question tests your understanding of process — managing technical aspects. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

You are a project manager for a software development project using Scrum. The product owner has been pressuring the team to increase velocity and deliver more features per sprint. The team feels overwhelmed and quality has started to suffer. Which TWO actions should the project manager take to address this situation?

Question 1mediummulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Involve the team in sprint planning to ensure they commit to a realistic amount of work.

The correct actions are to facilitate a discussion between the product owner and the team about sustainable pace and to involve the team in estimating and planning. These empower the team and ensure realistic commitments.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Involve the team in sprint planning to ensure they commit to a realistic amount of work.

    Why this is correct

    Self-organization and realistic commitments are key agile principles.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Ask the team to work overtime to meet the product owner's expectations.

    Why it's wrong here

    Working overtime is not sustainable and can lead to burnout and lower quality.

  • Encourage the team to reduce testing to save time.

    Why it's wrong here

    Reducing testing compromises quality.

  • Add more team members to the project to increase capacity.

    Why it's wrong here

    Adding people to a late project can slow it down (Brooks' law).

  • Facilitate a meeting between the product owner and the team to discuss velocity and sustainable pace.

    Why this is correct

    Open communication helps align expectations with reality.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the PMP exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which PMP exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Related practice questions

Related PMP practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free PMP practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this PMP question test?

Process — Managing Technical Aspects — This question tests Process — Managing Technical Aspects — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Involve the team in sprint planning to ensure they commit to a realistic amount of work. — The correct actions are to facilitate a discussion between the product owner and the team about sustainable pace and to involve the team in estimating and planning. These empower the team and ensure realistic commitments.

What should I do if I get this PMP question wrong?

Identify which PMP exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 21, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.