Question 10 of 892
People — Leading ProjectsmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct first step is to acknowledge the disagreement and schedule a separate meeting with both developers to resolve the issue. This approach is grounded in the core principle of servant leadership and conflict resolution within agile frameworks, where the daily stand-up is strictly for synchronization, not problem-solving. By de-escalating the argument and deferring the technical debate, you preserve the stand-up’s purpose and prevent team tension from escalating. On the PMP exam, this scenario tests your understanding of conflict management techniques and the facilitator role of a project manager in a hybrid environment. A common trap is choosing to let the argument continue or unilaterally deciding the technical approach, which undermines team collaboration and violates agile ceremonies. Remember the memory tip: “Acknowledge, then adjourn” — validate the concern, but move the deep dive to a separate forum.

PMP People — Leading Projects Practice Question

This PMP practice question tests your understanding of people — leading projects. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

You are leading a hybrid project team consisting of both colocated and remote members. During a daily stand-up, two senior developers have a heated argument about the technical approach for a critical feature. The argument disrupts the meeting and creates tension. What should you do first?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "first"

    Why it matters: Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Acknowledge the disagreement and schedule a separate meeting with both developers to discuss and resolve the issue

Option D is correct because, as a project manager leading a hybrid team, your first responsibility is to de-escalate the conflict and create a structured environment for resolution without disrupting the daily stand-up. Acknowledging the disagreement preserves team dynamics and ensures the technical decision is made collaboratively, leveraging both developers' expertise rather than imposing a unilateral solution. Scheduling a separate meeting allows focused discussion, preventing the stand-up from losing its purpose of synchronization.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Immediately decide on the technical approach yourself to end the argument

    Why it's wrong here

    The PM should not impose a solution without hearing both perspectives; this undermines team empowerment and may not be the best technical decision.

  • Tell both developers to resolve the issue on their own and report back

    Why it's wrong here

    This abdicates the PM's responsibility to manage conflict and may lead to unresolved issues affecting the project.

  • Escalate the issue to the project sponsor for resolution

    Why it's wrong here

    Escalation is premature; the PM should first attempt to resolve the conflict within the team.

  • Acknowledge the disagreement and schedule a separate meeting with both developers to discuss and resolve the issue

    Why this is correct

    This addresses the conflict directly while keeping the stand-up productive. The PM acts as a facilitator to resolve the technical disagreement.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "first" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates may confuse 'servant leadership' with 'direct intervention' (Option A) or 'delegation' (Option B), failing to recognize that the PM's first step is to acknowledge and contain the conflict before facilitating a resolution.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

In hybrid project environments, daily stand-ups are time-boxed to 15 minutes and focus on progress, not problem-solving. Allowing a heated argument to continue violates the Scrum principle of keeping the meeting for status updates. By scheduling a separate meeting, you apply the 'parking lot' technique, which preserves the stand-up's cadence while ensuring the technical debate gets the dedicated time it needs for root-cause analysis, such as evaluating trade-offs between architectural patterns like microservices vs. monoliths.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the PMP exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related PMP practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free PMP practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this PMP question test?

People — Leading Projects — This question tests People — Leading Projects — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Acknowledge the disagreement and schedule a separate meeting with both developers to discuss and resolve the issue — Option D is correct because, as a project manager leading a hybrid team, your first responsibility is to de-escalate the conflict and create a structured environment for resolution without disrupting the daily stand-up. Acknowledging the disagreement preserves team dynamics and ensures the technical decision is made collaboratively, leveraging both developers' expertise rather than imposing a unilateral solution. Scheduling a separate meeting allows focused discussion, preventing the stand-up from losing its purpose of synchronization.

What should I do if I get this PMP question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "first". Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.