- A
Replace underperforming team members with new resources
Why wrong: Replacing team members is disruptive and may not address root causes.
- B
Facilitate a retrospective to identify root causes of low velocity
A retrospective allows the team to inspect and adapt.
- C
Work with the team to remove impediments that are slowing them down
Removing impediments is a primary responsibility of the Scrum Master/project manager.
- D
Reduce the sprint backlog to match current velocity without analysis
Why wrong: Reducing backlog without understanding the cause is a band-aid solution.
- E
Encourage the team to maintain a sustainable pace and avoid overtime
Sustainable pace prevents burnout and supports consistent velocity.
Quick Answer
The correct actions are facilitating a retrospective, removing impediments, and encouraging a sustainable pace without overtime. These three interventions directly address the root causes of low velocity and demotivation by shifting the team’s focus from output pressure to process improvement and well-being. A retrospective creates a safe space for the team to identify blockers and workflow issues, while actively removing those impediments demonstrates tangible support from the project manager. Ensuring a sustainable pace prevents burnout, which is a common hidden driver of both low velocity and demoralization. On the PMP exam, this scenario tests your understanding of agile servant leadership versus traditional command-and-control responses—a frequent trap is choosing to “increase pressure” or “add more resources” instead of fostering team health. Remember the mnemonic “R.I.S.E.”: Retrospective, Impediments removed, Sustainable pace, Empowerment.
PMP Process — Managing Technical Aspects Practice Question
This PMP practice question tests your understanding of process — managing technical aspects. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
Your agile team is struggling with consistently low velocity. The team is demotivated. Which THREE actions should the project manager take to address this?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Facilitate a retrospective to identify root causes of low velocity
Options B, C, and D are correct: facilitating a retrospective, removing impediments, and ensuring sustainable pace are key agile practices to improve team performance.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Replace underperforming team members with new resources
Why it's wrong here
Replacing team members is disruptive and may not address root causes.
- ✓
Facilitate a retrospective to identify root causes of low velocity
Why this is correct
A retrospective allows the team to inspect and adapt.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✓
Work with the team to remove impediments that are slowing them down
Why this is correct
Removing impediments is a primary responsibility of the Scrum Master/project manager.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Reduce the sprint backlog to match current velocity without analysis
Why it's wrong here
Reducing backlog without understanding the cause is a band-aid solution.
- ✓
Encourage the team to maintain a sustainable pace and avoid overtime
Why this is correct
Sustainable pace prevents burnout and supports consistent velocity.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
- Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.
TExam Day Tips
- Underline the problem statement mentally.
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A practitioner preparing for the PMP exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which PMP exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
- →
Process — Managing Technical Aspects — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Process — Managing Technical Aspects practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All PMP questions
892 questions across all exam domains
- →
Project Management Professional PMP study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
PMP practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related PMP practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
People — Leading Projects practice questions
Practise PMP questions linked to People — Leading Projects.
Process — Managing Technical Aspects practice questions
Practise PMP questions linked to Process — Managing Technical Aspects.
Business Environment — Strategy and Value practice questions
Practise PMP questions linked to Business Environment — Strategy and Value.
Business Environment: strategy and project benefits practice questions
Practise PMP questions linked to Business Environment: strategy and project benefits.
PMP fundamentals practice questions
Practise PMP questions linked to PMP fundamentals.
PMP scenario practice questions
Practise PMP questions linked to PMP scenario.
PMP troubleshooting practice questions
Practise PMP questions linked to PMP troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free PMP practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this PMP question test?
Process — Managing Technical Aspects — This question tests Process — Managing Technical Aspects — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Facilitate a retrospective to identify root causes of low velocity — Options B, C, and D are correct: facilitating a retrospective, removing impediments, and ensuring sustainable pace are key agile practices to improve team performance.
What should I do if I get this PMP question wrong?
Identify which PMP exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
1 more ways this is tested on PMP
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. Your agile project is experiencing declining velocity, and the team is frustrated with frequent interruptions from stakeholders requesting ad-hoc features. Which TWO actions should you take to address this situation?
hard- ✓ A.Add all ad-hoc requests to the product backlog for prioritization
- B.Allow the team to accept some ad-hoc requests to keep stakeholders happy
- C.Increase the sprint length to accommodate more work
- D.Reduce the team size to minimize communication overhead
- ✓ E.Ask the product owner to enforce a strict 'no changes during sprint' policy
Why A: Protecting the team from interruptions and ensuring proper backlog prioritization are key agile practices.
Last reviewed: Jun 21, 2026
This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.