Question 234 of 503
Agile Frameworks and MethodologieseasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is to ask the Product Owner to add the changes to the Product Backlog for prioritization in future Sprints. This is correct because the Sprint Review is an inspect-and-adapt event for feedback, not a mid-Sprint change window; the current Sprint’s scope and Sprint Goal are fixed to protect the Development Team’s focus. On the CAPM exam, this question tests your understanding of the Product Owner’s accountability for backlog management versus the Scrum Master’s role as a facilitator. A common trap is choosing an option that suggests modifying the current Sprint or having the team implement changes immediately, which violates Scrum’s time-boxed commitment. Remember the key distinction: the Sprint Review inspects the increment, but the Product Backlog is the single source for future work. A useful memory tip is “Review for feedback, Backlog for change”—if a stakeholder requests a change during the review, it always goes to the Product Backlog, never into the current Sprint.

CAPM Agile Frameworks and Methodologies Practice Question

This CAPM practice question tests your understanding of agile frameworks and methodologies. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A startup is adopting Scrum for the first time. During the Sprint Review, stakeholders request many changes to the product increment. What is the best way for the Scrum Master to handle this?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "best"

    Why it matters: Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

  • Clue: "first"

    Why it matters: Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.

Question 1easymultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Ask the Product Owner to add the changes to the Product Backlog for prioritization in future Sprints.

In Scrum, the Sprint Review is a time for stakeholders to inspect the increment and provide feedback, but changes cannot be made to the current Sprint as the Sprint Goal and scope are fixed. The Product Owner is responsible for managing the Product Backlog, so the best action is to capture these change requests and have the Product Owner add them to the Product Backlog for future prioritization. This ensures the Development Team remains focused on the current Sprint Goal and that changes are evaluated against business value and priority in upcoming Sprints.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Let the Development Team decide which changes to implement immediately.

    Why it's wrong here

    The Development Team should not unilaterally accept changes; the Product Owner prioritizes the backlog.

  • Add the changes to the current Sprint Backlog immediately.

    Why it's wrong here

    Adding changes to the current Sprint disrupts the Sprint Goal and is not recommended.

  • Ask the Product Owner to add the changes to the Product Backlog for prioritization in future Sprints.

    Why this is correct

    The Product Owner manages the Product Backlog; feedback is captured and prioritized for future Sprints.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue words "best", "first" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Ignore the feedback since the Sprint is complete.

    Why it's wrong here

    Ignoring stakeholder feedback defeats the purpose of the Sprint Review.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates confuse the Sprint Review with a mid-Sprint change opportunity, thinking stakeholder feedback must be acted on immediately, rather than understanding that the Product Backlog is the proper channel for all new requirements.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

The Sprint Review is a formal event where the Scrum Team and stakeholders collaborate on what was done and what to do next; it is not a gate for mid-Sprint changes. The Product Backlog is a living artifact that the Product Owner continuously refines, and adding stakeholder requests there ensures they are prioritized against other work using techniques like MoSCoW or WSJF. In a real-world scenario, a startup adopting Scrum might face pressure to immediately incorporate feedback, but doing so would undermine the Sprint's timebox and the team's velocity, leading to unpredictable delivery and loss of trust in the framework.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the CAPM exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CAPM practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CAPM practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CAPM question test?

Agile Frameworks and Methodologies — This question tests Agile Frameworks and Methodologies — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Ask the Product Owner to add the changes to the Product Backlog for prioritization in future Sprints. — In Scrum, the Sprint Review is a time for stakeholders to inspect the increment and provide feedback, but changes cannot be made to the current Sprint as the Sprint Goal and scope are fixed. The Product Owner is responsible for managing the Product Backlog, so the best action is to capture these change requests and have the Product Owner add them to the Product Backlog for future prioritization. This ensures the Development Team remains focused on the current Sprint Goal and that changes are evaluated against business value and priority in upcoming Sprints.

What should I do if I get this CAPM question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "best", "first". Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on CAPM

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. An agile team is using a burndown chart for the first time. After six days of a two-week sprint, the burndown chart shows that the remaining work has increased compared to the previous day. The team is confused. They had completed several tasks, but new tasks were added to the sprint backlog after the sprint started. The product owner says the additions were urgent and necessary. The development team is frustrated because they feel the sprint goal is at risk. The Scrum Master must address this situation. What should the Scrum Master do?

easy
  • A.Instruct the team to ignore the burndown chart and focus on delivering the original sprint goal
  • B.Explain to the product owner that the sprint backlog is frozen once the sprint starts and cannot be changed
  • C.Ask the product owner and team to renegotiate the sprint scope, either removing some planned work or deferring the new work to the next sprint
  • D.Manually adjust the burndown chart to show the completed tasks and hide the additional work

Why C: In Scrum, the product owner should not add work to the sprint backlog after the sprint starts without removing equivalent work, ideally in agreement with the team. The Scrum Master should reinforce this rule. Adding work without adjustment violates the sprint commitment and causes the burndown to increase. Blaming the team or adjusting the burndown manually is not the right approach. Ignoring the additions perpetuates the problem.

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CAPM practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CAPM exam.