- A
Accept the delay and update the project schedule accordingly.
Why wrong: Accepting delay should be a last resort after evaluating compression options.
- B
Assess the risks of fast-tracking the two activities.
Fast-tracking increases risk, so risk assessment must precede implementation.
- C
Submit a change request to extend the deadline.
Why wrong: A change request should be considered only after determining that schedule compression is not possible or acceptable.
- D
Immediately add resources to the delayed activity to catch up.
Why wrong: Crashing (adding resources) is a different technique and may not be feasible due to budget constraints.
CAPM Predictive Plan-Based Methodologies Practice Question
This CAPM practice question tests your understanding of predictive plan-based methodologies. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A project manager is leading a construction project with a fixed budget and strict deadline. During execution, a key supplier notifies that a critical material will be delayed by two weeks, which will push the project past the deadline. The project manager reviews the schedule and identifies that the delay can be compensated by fast-tracking two subsequent activities that are currently planned sequentially. What should the project manager do first?
Clue words in this question
Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.
Clue:
"first"Why it matters: Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Assess the risks of fast-tracking the two activities.
The correct first step is to assess the risks of fast-tracking the two activities (Option B). Fast-tracking involves performing activities in parallel that were originally planned sequentially, which can introduce new risks such as rework, resource conflicts, or quality issues. The PMBOK Guide emphasizes that before implementing a schedule compression technique, the project manager must evaluate the associated risks and determine if the benefits outweigh the potential negative impacts. Since the project has a fixed budget and strict deadline, a risk assessment ensures informed decision-making before proceeding.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Accept the delay and update the project schedule accordingly.
Why it's wrong here
Accepting delay should be a last resort after evaluating compression options.
- ✓
Assess the risks of fast-tracking the two activities.
Why this is correct
Fast-tracking increases risk, so risk assessment must precede implementation.
Clue confirmation
The clue word "first" in the question point toward this answer.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Submit a change request to extend the deadline.
Why it's wrong here
A change request should be considered only after determining that schedule compression is not possible or acceptable.
- ✗
Immediately add resources to the delayed activity to catch up.
Why it's wrong here
Crashing (adding resources) is a different technique and may not be feasible due to budget constraints.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates may immediately choose to add resources (Option D) or accept the delay (Option A) without recognizing that the PMBOK Guide prescribes risk assessment as the mandatory first step before implementing any schedule compression technique.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Fast-tracking is a schedule compression technique that involves performing critical path activities in parallel instead of sequentially, which can reduce project duration but increases risk of rework due to overlapping dependencies. In predictive methodologies, the project manager must first analyze the critical path and identify float before applying compression techniques, as fast-tracking non-critical activities yields no schedule benefit. Real-world scenarios, such as construction projects, often require risk assessment of fast-tracking because overlapping tasks like foundation work and framing can lead to safety hazards or quality defects if not properly coordinated.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A practitioner preparing for the CAPM exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Predictive Plan-Based Methodologies — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Predictive Plan-Based Methodologies practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All CAPM questions
503 questions across all exam domains
- →
Certified Associate in Project Management CAPM study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
CAPM practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related CAPM practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Agile Frameworks and Methodologies practice questions
Practise CAPM questions linked to Agile Frameworks and Methodologies.
Project Management Fundamentals and Core Concepts practice questions
Practise CAPM questions linked to Project Management Fundamentals and Core Concepts.
Predictive Plan-Based Methodologies practice questions
Practise CAPM questions linked to Predictive Plan-Based Methodologies.
Business Analysis Frameworks practice questions
Practise CAPM questions linked to Business Analysis Frameworks.
CAPM fundamentals practice questions
Practise CAPM questions linked to CAPM fundamentals.
CAPM scenario practice questions
Practise CAPM questions linked to CAPM scenario.
CAPM troubleshooting practice questions
Practise CAPM questions linked to CAPM troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free CAPM practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this CAPM question test?
Predictive Plan-Based Methodologies — This question tests Predictive Plan-Based Methodologies — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Assess the risks of fast-tracking the two activities. — The correct first step is to assess the risks of fast-tracking the two activities (Option B). Fast-tracking involves performing activities in parallel that were originally planned sequentially, which can introduce new risks such as rework, resource conflicts, or quality issues. The PMBOK Guide emphasizes that before implementing a schedule compression technique, the project manager must evaluate the associated risks and determine if the benefits outweigh the potential negative impacts. Since the project has a fixed budget and strict deadline, a risk assessment ensures informed decision-making before proceeding.
What should I do if I get this CAPM question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
Are there clue words in this question I should notice?
Yes — watch for: "first". Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026
This CAPM practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CAPM exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.