The correct answer identifies that the Quality Review technique is a structured review to identify defects in a product and that it is a form of quality control. This technique, defined within the PRINCE2 quality management approach, involves a systematic, meeting-based inspection of a product against its agreed quality criteria, focusing on finding errors or omissions rather than testing functionality. On the PRINCE2 Foundation exam, this question tests your ability to distinguish quality control from quality assurance and to recognize that the review is performed by subject matter experts, not the Project Board, and that it applies to products, not the Business Case. A common trap is confusing a review with testing or assuming the Project Board conducts it. Remember the mnemonic “RIDE”: Review Identifies Defects, Experts evaluate.
PRINCE2F PRINCE2 Practices Practice Question
This PRINCE2F practice question tests your understanding of prince2 practices. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
Which TWO of the following statements about the Quality Review technique are correct?
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
It is a form of quality control
The Quality Review technique involves a structured review of a product against its quality criteria. Option A is correct: the review identifies defects. Option D is correct: it is a form of quality control. Option B is false: the review does not test; it is a review. Option C is false: it is not performed by the Project Board; it involves subject matter experts. Option E is false: the review is not about the Business Case; it's about products.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
✗
It is performed by the Project Board
Why it's wrong here
The review involves peers, not the Project Board.
✓
It is a form of quality control
Why this is correct
Correct. Quality Review is a quality control technique.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
✗
It assesses the viability of the Business Case
Why it's wrong here
The Business Case is assessed separately.
✓
It is a structured review to identify defects in a product
Why this is correct
Correct. The review identifies defects.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
✗
It is used to test the product against its specification
Why it's wrong here
Testing is different; the Quality Review is a review, not a test.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.
KKey Concepts to Remember
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.
TExam Day Tips
→Underline the problem statement mentally.
→Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
→Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A practitioner preparing for the PRINCE2F exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which PRINCE2F exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
PRINCE2 Practices — This question tests PRINCE2 Practices — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: It is a form of quality control — The Quality Review technique involves a structured review of a product against its quality criteria. Option A is correct: the review identifies defects. Option D is correct: it is a form of quality control. Option B is false: the review does not test; it is a review. Option C is false: it is not performed by the Project Board; it involves subject matter experts. Option E is false: the review is not about the Business Case; it's about products.
What should I do if I get this PRINCE2F question wrong?
Identify which PRINCE2F exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. Which TWO of the following statements about the Quality Review technique are correct?
hard
✓ A.It is used to assess whether a product meets its quality criteria
B.It is only used for products delivered to external customers
C.It is always performed by the Project Assurance role
✓ D.It involves a defined set of roles: Chair, Presenter, and Reviewers
E.It is an audit of the project's quality management system
Why A: The Quality Review technique is a formal process for reviewing product descriptions and checking quality. It involves a chair, presenter, and reviewers. Options A and D are correct; B is wrong because reviewers are not necessarily from the project team; C is wrong because it is a 'peer review', not an 'audit'; E is wrong because it can be used for any product, not just those for external stakeholders.
Last reviewed: Jun 21, 2026
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
This PRINCE2F practice question is part of Courseiva's free PeopleCert certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PRINCE2F exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.