Courseiva
PRINCE2 Practices →easyMultiple Choice

PRINCE2F PRINCE2 Practices Practice Question

Which risk response is specifically for opportunities?

⚠ Common exam trap

Test-takers frequently confuse 'Enhance' with 'Reduce' or 'Avoid' because they associate all risk responses with mitigating negative impacts, forgetting that PRINCE2 treats opportunities with distinct responses like Enhance and Exploit.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Enhance

Enhance, because PRINCE2 defines Enhance as the specific risk response for increasing the probability and/or impact of an opportunity. Unlike threats, opportunities require proactive responses to maximize potential benefits, and Enhance is the direct counterpart to Reduce for threats.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Transfer

    Why it's wrong here

    Transfer shifts financial exposure to a third party, such as insurance, which suits threats rather than opportunities. It is tempting because transfer is a recognised PRINCE2 response, yet the opportunity-specific responses are exploit, enhance, share and reject, so transfer fails this scenario.

  • ✗

    Avoid

    Why it's wrong here

    Avoid is a threat response that eliminates the activity or exposure; opportunities require responses such as exploit, enhance, share or reject. Avoid is tempting because it appears in the standard response list, but applying it to an opportunity would forgo the potential benefit rather than realise it.

  • ✓

    Enhance

    Why this is correct

    Enhance suits opportunities because it raises the probability or impact of a positive risk, unlike threat-focused responses such as avoid, reduce, transfer or accept. PRINCE2 pairs exploit, share and enhance with opportunities, satisfying the stem's requirement for a response designed specifically to maximise upside rather than mitigate loss.

  • ✗

    Reduce

    Why it's wrong here

    Reducing targets probability or impact, which applies to threats; for opportunities the equivalent response is 'exploit' or 'enhance', not reduce. It is tempting because reduction is a core PRINCE2 response, but it is defined for negative risk, whereas opportunity responses seek to realise or maximise the upside.

About these practice questions

One of 1,189 original PRINCE2F practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This PRINCE2F practice question is part of Courseiva's free PeopleCert certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PRINCE2F exam.