PRINCE2F Practice Question: Overview of PRINCE2 and the project environment
What is the purpose of the PRINCE2 principle 'Continued business justification'?
⚠ Common exam trap
PRINCE2F often tests the confusion between the seven principles and the seven themes, so candidates pick an answer that describes a theme activity (like defining scope or assigning roles) instead of the specific principle being asked about.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
To ensure that the project remains viable by regularly reviewing the Business Case
The 'Continued business justification' principle requires that every PRINCE2 project has a valid, documented Business Case that is reviewed and re-validated at every stage boundary and at each End Stage Assessment. If the justification no longer holds (e.g., costs outweigh benefits, risks become unacceptable), the project must be stopped or re-scoped. This is why option A correctly ties the principle to regular Business Case review to keep the project viable.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
To ensure that the project remains viable by regularly reviewing the Business Case
Why this is correct
Continued business justification requires the Business Case to be reviewed and updated at every stage boundary and whenever significant change occurs, confirming the project remains viable and aligned with organisational objectives before further investment is committed.
- ✗
To assign roles and responsibilities to the project team
Why it's wrong here
Continued business justification ensures the project remains viable and aligned to benefits, reviewed at each stage boundary; assigning roles is the 'defined roles and responsibilities' principle. It tempts because both are principles, yet this one governs viability, not team structure or role allocation.
- ✗
To ensure that the project delivers products on time and within budget
Why it's wrong here
Continued business justification requires a valid Business Case to remain viable throughout the project, so it can be stopped if justification lapses. Delivering on time and within budget describes tolerance performance, not justification. It tempts because schedule and cost are visible success measures, but a project can meet both and still lack justification.
- ✗
To define the project's scope and objectives
Why it's wrong here
Defining scope and objectives happens when writing the Project Brief and Business Case, not through this principle. Continued business justification instead requires the Business Case to be reviewed and remain valid at each stage boundary. It tempts because justification sounds like defining purpose, but scope definition is a starting-up activity, not ongoing viability.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
This PRINCE2F question is part of Courseiva's 1,189-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official PeopleCert exam blueprint
This PRINCE2F practice question is part of Courseiva's free PeopleCert certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PRINCE2F exam.