A cloud administrator is troubleshooting a web application hosted on a cloud virtual machine (VM) that is experiencing intermittent high latency during peak traffic hours. The application is deployed on a single VM instance with 4 vCPUs and 8 GB RAM, running a Linux OS. The VM is connected to a virtual network with a public IP. The administrator has verified that the application code is optimized and there are no memory leaks. CPU utilization remains below 50% during peaks, but network outbound traffic shows periodic spikes up to 500 Mbps. The VM's network interface is configured with a 1 Gbps bandwidth cap. The administrator suspects that the issue is related to network throttling or packet loss. Which of the following actions should the administrator take to resolve the issue?
The 1 Gbps interface cap is the bottleneck: periodic 500 Mbps outbound spikes plus burst overhead can saturate it, causing throttling and packet loss. A larger instance size raises the network bandwidth cap to 2 Gbps, removing that ceiling so peak traffic no longer queues at the interface.
Why this answer
The VM's network bandwidth cap of 1 Gbps is being saturated during peak traffic (spikes up to 500 Mbps, but with overhead and burst behavior, the cap can cause throttling and packet loss). Upgrading to a larger instance size with a higher network bandwidth cap (e.g., 2 Gbps) directly addresses the bottleneck by providing more headroom for outbound traffic, reducing latency caused by queueing and drops. The administrator has already ruled out CPU and memory issues, so the network cap is the likely culprit.
Exam trap
The trap here is that candidates may assume CPU or memory is the bottleneck because latency is intermittent, but the question explicitly states CPU is below 50% and memory is fine, so the real issue is the network bandwidth cap, which is a common cloud-specific limitation tied to instance size.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because increasing vCPUs does not increase network bandwidth capacity; the bottleneck is network throughput, not compute, and CPU utilization is already below 50%. Option C is wrong because configuring the firewall to allow all traffic would not reduce processing overhead in a meaningful way and could actually increase security risks; firewall processing overhead is negligible compared to the bandwidth cap limitation. Option D is wrong because DDoS protection is designed to filter malicious traffic, not to resolve throttling or packet loss caused by legitimate peak traffic exceeding the bandwidth cap.