Courseiva
mediumMultiple Choice

300-410 Practice Question: Is troubleshooting a route redistribution issue…

A network engineer is troubleshooting a route redistribution issue between EIGRP and OSPF. Routers R1 (EIGRP) and R2 (OSPF) are redistributing routes. The engineer notices that some EIGRP external routes (redistributed into EIGRP from another protocol) are not appearing in the OSPF database on R2. The show ip ospf database external command on R2 does not list these prefixes. What is the most likely cause?

⚠ Common exam trap

300-410 often tests the subnets keyword omission as the classic cause of missing subnetted routes in OSPF, tricking candidates who look for more exotic causes like distribute-lists or administrative distance instead of the simple default classful behavior.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

The redistribute eigrp command under OSPF is missing the subnets keyword.

The most likely cause is that the redistribute eigrp command under OSPF is missing the subnets keyword. Without subnets, OSPF only redistributes classful network routes and drops subnetted prefixes, so EIGRP external routes that are subnetted never appear in the OSPF database as external LSAs.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✓

    The redistribute eigrp command under OSPF is missing the subnets keyword.

    Why this is correct

    Without the subnets keyword, OSPF redistributes only classful major networks, so external EIGRP prefixes with non-classful masks are omitted from the OSPF database. Adding subnets allows those external routes to be advertised and appear in show ip ospf database external.

  • ✗

    The redistribute eigrp command under OSPF is missing the match external keyword.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. The 'match external' keyword is not a valid option for the 'redistribute eigrp' command under OSPF. The correct command does not have such a keyword.

  • ✗

    EIGRP has a higher administrative distance than OSPF, causing route suppression.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. Administrative distance does not affect redistribution; it is used for route selection when multiple routes exist.

  • ✗

    The OSPF process on R2 has a distribute-list blocking these routes.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. While a distribute-list could block routes, it is less likely than the missing 'subnets' keyword, especially given the symptom of external routes not appearing.

Visual reference

R1 R2 R3 R4 10 100 10 100 OSPF picks R1→R2→R4 (cost 20) over R1→R3→R4 (cost 200)

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every 300-410 question from scratch — 1,401 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official Cisco exam blueprint

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.