PMP Process — Managing Technical Aspects Practice Question
Your project is in execution phase. An executive stakeholder bypasses you and directly instructs a team member to add a new feature. The team member complies and completes the work. You discover this during a status review. What should you do FIRST?
⚠ Common exam trap
Test-takers frequently choose to immediately escalate or confront the stakeholder (options B or D) without first assessing the impact, which is a violation of the PMI's principle of 'first, do no harm' and the logical sequence of the change control process.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Assess the impact of the new feature on scope, schedule, and cost, then submit a change request retroactively
As the project manager, your first responsibility is to assess the impact of the unauthorized change on the project's triple constraints (scope, schedule, cost) before taking any corrective action. This aligns with the PMBOK Guide's guidance to evaluate the situation and then follow the formal change control process, even retroactively, to ensure proper documentation and approval. Confronting or reporting without understanding the impact would be premature and could escalate the issue unnecessarily.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Accept the work as done and update the project documents accordingly
Why it's wrong here
Accepting unauthorized work directly undermines the project's integrated change control process, setting a dangerous precedent. This action bypasses formal review and approval, potentially leading to unmanaged scope creep, budget overruns, and schedule delays without proper stakeholder alignment. It compromises project governance and the integrity of the baselines, making it difficult to track actual progress against approved plans.
- ✗
Report the executive to the project sponsor for violating the change control process
Why it's wrong here
Immediately reporting an executive stakeholder to the project sponsor for a process violation is a premature and escalatory step. The project manager's primary responsibility is to first assess the situation, understand the context, and attempt to resolve issues through direct, professional communication and established project processes. Escalation to the sponsor should be reserved for situations where direct resolution attempts have failed or the impact is critical and unmanageable at the project level.
- ✓
Assess the impact of the new feature on scope, schedule, and cost, then submit a change request retroactively
Why this is correct
This is the most appropriate action as it demonstrates proactive project management in a challenging situation. By assessing the impact on scope, schedule, and cost, the project manager gathers critical data necessary to understand the full implications of the unauthorized work. Subsequently submitting a retroactive change request formally brings the work under the project's integrated change control process, allowing for proper documentation, review, and approval, thus maintaining project integrity and baselines.
- ✗
Confront the executive stakeholder and insist they follow the change control process
Why it's wrong here
Confronting an executive stakeholder directly and insisting on process adherence is an adversarial approach that can damage critical stakeholder relationships. While process adherence is vital, a project manager should prioritize professional communication, collaboration, and problem-solving over confrontation. Such an approach risks alienating a key stakeholder, making future cooperation difficult, and does not align with effective stakeholder engagement strategies.
Go deeper
Related to this question
Learn chapter
Introduction to the PMP Exam and Project Management Basics
Key term
Change Control Process
A formal, structured procedure used to manage any changes to a project's scope, schedule, budget, or requirements, ensuring every modification is reviewed, approved, tested, and documented before implementation.
About these practice questions
One of 800 original PMP practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.