Question 566 of 892
Business Environment: strategy and project benefitsmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is to analyze the impact of the proposed reduction and submit a change request to the Change Control Board (CCB). This is correct because the project manager must follow the formal change control process whenever a sponsor suggests reducing scope to meet budget, even if the intent seems straightforward. The PMBOK Guide emphasizes that any change to the project baseline—whether scope, cost, or schedule—requires a documented evaluation of its effects on constraints like quality, risk, and stakeholder satisfaction before approval. On the PMP exam, this scenario tests your understanding of the Integrated Change Control process and the project manager’s role as a facilitator, not a unilateral decision-maker. A common trap is to immediately agree with the sponsor or implement the cut without analysis, but the correct path is always to assess impact and seek CCB approval. Memory tip: “Scope cut? Don’t just shut—assess and submit.”

PMP Practice Question: Business Environment: strategy and project benefits

This PMP practice question tests your understanding of business environment: strategy and project benefits. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Your project is 40% complete and running 15% over budget due to unforeseen technical challenges. The project sponsor suggests reducing scope by removing non-essential features to meet the budget. What should you do?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Analyze the impact of the proposed reduction and submit a change request to the CCB

The project manager should follow the formal change control process to evaluate the impact of reducing scope and obtain approval from the change control board (CCB) before making changes.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Update the project charter to reflect the new scope without further approval

    Why it's wrong here

    Only the sponsor or authorized body can change the charter; the PM cannot unilaterally change it.

  • Reject the sponsor's suggestion because scope reduction always leads to project failure

    Why it's wrong here

    Scope reduction is a valid response to budget issues if approved through proper channels.

  • Agree with the sponsor and immediately instruct the team to stop work on non-essential features

    Why it's wrong here

    Implementing scope changes without formal change control violates the project management plan.

  • Analyze the impact of the proposed reduction and submit a change request to the CCB

    Why this is correct

    The PM should assess the impact and follow the change control process to formally approve scope changes.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the PMP exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which PMP exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Related practice questions

Related PMP practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free PMP practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this PMP question test?

Business Environment: strategy and project benefits — This question tests Business Environment: strategy and project benefits — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Analyze the impact of the proposed reduction and submit a change request to the CCB — The project manager should follow the formal change control process to evaluate the impact of reducing scope and obtain approval from the change control board (CCB) before making changes.

What should I do if I get this PMP question wrong?

Identify which PMP exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on PMP

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. Your construction project is running 15% over budget at the midpoint. The sponsor asks you to cut costs by reducing quality inspections on concrete pours. What should you do FIRST?

medium
  • A.Immediately reduce inspections as requested to stay on budget
  • B.Analyze the impact of reducing inspections on quality and risk, then discuss alternatives with the sponsor
  • C.Refuse the request and stop all cost-cutting measures
  • D.Agree to reduce inspections but document it as a decision

Why B: Option B is correct because the PM should analyze the impact of reducing inspections on quality and risk, then communicate to the sponsor and follow change control. Option A is wrong because cost cutting may not be the only option and quality reductions could jeopardize compliance. Option C is wrong as it bypasses analysis and change control. Option D is wrong because stopping work is premature without exploring other options.

Last reviewed: Jun 21, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.