Question 667 of 892
People — Leading ProjectsmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

PMP People — Leading Projects Practice Question

This PMP practice question tests your understanding of people — leading projects. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Your agile team's velocity has dropped for the third consecutive sprint. The team members report feeling burned out and demotivated due to excessive overtime. What should the project manager do first?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "first"

    Why it matters: Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Hold a retrospective focused on identifying the causes of overtime and discuss ways to improve sustainable pace

Option B is correct because the first step when facing burnout and overtime is to hold a retrospective to identify root causes and discuss sustainable pace improvements. This aligns with the agile principle of continuous improvement and the PMP People domain focus on team motivation and well-being. Addressing the underlying issues before taking corrective actions ensures long-term productivity rather than temporary fixes.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Increase the team size by adding new members to distribute the workload

    Why it's wrong here

    Adding members may not solve burnout and could introduce additional overhead.

  • Hold a retrospective focused on identifying the causes of overtime and discuss ways to improve sustainable pace

    Why this is correct

    The retrospective is the appropriate agile ceremony to address team issues and find solutions collaboratively.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "first" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Reduce the scope of the next sprint to give the team a break

    Why it's wrong here

    While well-intentioned, this should be a result of the retrospective, not a unilateral decision.

  • Inform the product owner that the team cannot commit to any new features until morale improves

    Why it's wrong here

    This is too abrupt; the PM should first discuss the issue with the team and product owner.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

PMI often tests the misconception that the immediate response to a velocity drop is to add resources or reduce scope, rather than first diagnosing the root cause through a team-led retrospective.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

In agile frameworks, sustainable pace is a core principle from the Agile Manifesto, emphasizing that teams should maintain a constant, manageable pace indefinitely. The retrospective is a formal Scrum event (typically time-boxed to 1.5 hours for a one-month sprint) where the team inspects its processes and creates a plan for improvements. Burnout often results from cumulative work-in-progress (WIP) limits being ignored, leading to context switching and reduced flow efficiency, which can be measured using cycle time and throughput metrics.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the PMP exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related PMP practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free PMP practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this PMP question test?

People — Leading Projects — This question tests People — Leading Projects — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Hold a retrospective focused on identifying the causes of overtime and discuss ways to improve sustainable pace — Option B is correct because the first step when facing burnout and overtime is to hold a retrospective to identify root causes and discuss sustainable pace improvements. This aligns with the agile principle of continuous improvement and the PMP People domain focus on team motivation and well-being. Addressing the underlying issues before taking corrective actions ensures long-term productivity rather than temporary fixes.

What should I do if I get this PMP question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "first". Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 30, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.