Question 484 of 892
People — Leading ProjectseasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is ensuring stakeholders are involved in the sprint review and provide feedback early and often. This is correct because the root cause of stakeholder dissatisfaction in a sprint review is a disconnect between the team’s assumptions and the stakeholders’ actual expectations, which can only be resolved through continuous collaboration. The technical concept here is the Agile principle of customer collaboration over contract negotiation, which demands that feedback loops be short and frequent so the product increment aligns with stakeholder needs throughout development, not just at the end. On the PMP exam, this question tests your understanding of stakeholder engagement in Agile frameworks, often appearing as a trap where candidates mistakenly choose to “re-estimate the backlog” or “improve user story writing,” missing the core issue of insufficient feedback. A strong memory tip is to think of the “feedback firewall”—early and often involvement prevents last-minute disappointment by validating expectations incrementally.

PMP People — Leading Projects Practice Question

This PMP practice question tests your understanding of people — leading projects. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

During a sprint review, stakeholders express disappointment with the product increment, stating it does not meet their expectations. The team believed they were on track based on the user stories. What should the project manager do to prevent this in the future?

Question 1easymultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Ensure stakeholders are involved in the sprint review and provide feedback early and often

Option B is correct because the root cause of the disconnect is a lack of early and continuous stakeholder involvement. By engaging stakeholders in the sprint review and soliciting feedback frequently, the project manager ensures that expectations are validated against the increment throughout the development cycle, not just at the end. This aligns with the Agile principle of customer collaboration over contract negotiation and prevents the team from building features based on assumptions.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Document the feedback and adjust the next sprint accordingly

    Why it's wrong here

    This is reactive; prevention is better.

  • Ensure stakeholders are involved in the sprint review and provide feedback early and often

    Why this is correct

    Regular stakeholder involvement during reviews helps catch misalignment early.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Ask the product owner to write more detailed user stories

    Why it's wrong here

    While helpful, the issue may be about validation, not just detail.

  • Have the team present their work to stakeholders more frequently

    Why it's wrong here

    Frequency alone may not help if the format doesn't allow for meaningful feedback.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

PMI often tests the misconception that more documentation or more frequent status updates solve communication gaps, when the real solution is structured, iterative stakeholder collaboration during the sprint review.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

In Scrum, the sprint review is a formal inspect-and-adapt event where stakeholders and the team collaborate on what to do next. The Product Owner is responsible for ensuring the backlog items align with stakeholder needs, but the project manager must facilitate a culture of continuous feedback. A real-world scenario where this matters is in regulated industries (e.g., healthcare IT), where late-stage stakeholder disappointment can lead to costly rework or compliance failures—early feedback loops mitigate this risk.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the PMP exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related PMP practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free PMP practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this PMP question test?

People — Leading Projects — This question tests People — Leading Projects — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Ensure stakeholders are involved in the sprint review and provide feedback early and often — Option B is correct because the root cause of the disconnect is a lack of early and continuous stakeholder involvement. By engaging stakeholders in the sprint review and soliciting feedback frequently, the project manager ensures that expectations are validated against the increment throughout the development cycle, not just at the end. This aligns with the Agile principle of customer collaboration over contract negotiation and prevents the team from building features based on assumptions.

What should I do if I get this PMP question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

3 more ways this is tested on PMP

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. During a sprint review, the product owner expresses dissatisfaction with the feature delivered, stating it does not meet the acceptance criteria. The team disagrees, claiming it meets the definition of done. What should the project manager do first?

medium
  • A.Escalate the issue to the project sponsor for a decision
  • B.Schedule a meeting with the product owner and the team to review the acceptance criteria and define done
  • C.Support the team's position and ask the product owner to accept the deliverable
  • D.Ask the team to redo the work to meet the product owner's expectations

Why B: Clarifying expectations by reviewing the acceptance criteria together resolves the misunderstanding and aligns both parties.

Variation 2. During a sprint review, the product owner expresses dissatisfaction with the delivered increment because it does not meet their expectations. The team followed the agreed-upon acceptance criteria. What should the project manager do?

medium
  • A.Inform the product owner that the work meets the agreed criteria and cannot be changed
  • B.Escalate the issue to the project sponsor for a decision
  • C.Ask the team to redo the work to meet the product owner's unstated expectations
  • D.Facilitate a conversation between the product owner and the team to clarify expectations and update the acceptance criteria for next sprint

Why D: The PM should facilitate a discussion between the product owner and the team to clarify expectations. This demonstrates servant leadership and proactive communication. Adjusting the acceptance criteria for future sprints ensures alignment.

Variation 3. During a sprint review, the product owner expresses dissatisfaction with a feature delivered by the team, stating it does not meet the acceptance criteria. The team insists they followed the requirements as written. What should the project manager do FIRST?

medium
  • A.Ask the team to redo the feature to meet the product owner's expectations.
  • B.Facilitate a conversation between the product owner and the team to clarify the acceptance criteria.
  • C.Update the project documents to reflect the product owner's new requirements.
  • D.Refer to the project charter to determine the original scope.

Why B: Option B is correct because the immediate priority is to resolve the misunderstanding between the product owner and the team. The project manager should facilitate a conversation to clarify the acceptance criteria, ensuring both parties have a shared understanding before any rework or documentation changes occur. This aligns with the PMP's focus on stakeholder engagement and conflict resolution within the 'People' domain.

Last reviewed: Jun 30, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.