Courseiva
People — Leading ProjectshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

PMP People — Leading Projects Practice Question

During a sprint, you observe that a team member is consistently underperforming, missing tasks, and producing low-quality work. They have been a reliable performer in the past. What should you do FIRST?

⚠ Common exam trap

Test-takers frequently confuse the need for immediate corrective action (like documentation or reassignment) with the servant leadership principle of first seeking to understand the root cause through empathetic communication, especially when the team member has a history of reliability.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Have a private, empathetic conversation with the team member to understand any personal or professional challenges

The first step in addressing a sudden performance decline from a previously reliable team member is to have a private, empathetic conversation to uncover root causes. This aligns with the PMP's servant leadership approach, which prioritizes understanding personal or professional challenges before taking corrective action. Jumping to documentation or reassignment without this dialogue violates the principle of leading with empathy and could damage trust and team morale.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Have a private, empathetic conversation with the team member to understand any personal or professional challenges

    Why this is correct

    As a PMP, the project manager's role includes servant leadership and fostering a supportive team environment. Initiating a private, empathetic conversation is crucial for demonstrating emotional intelligence and understanding the underlying causes of consistent underperformance, which could range from personal issues to resource constraints or skill gaps. This approach prioritizes early intervention and collaborative problem-solving, aligning with agile principles of self-organizing teams and continuous improvement before escalating.

  • Escalate the issue to the functional manager for disciplinary action

    Why it's wrong here

    Escalating directly to the functional manager for disciplinary action is premature and bypasses the project manager's responsibility to first address team issues directly. This approach can erode trust within the project team, create a punitive environment, and potentially exacerbate the problem by not understanding its root cause. A PMP should always attempt to resolve performance issues through direct communication and support before involving higher management or formal disciplinary processes.

  • Formally document the underperformance and initiate a performance improvement plan

    Why it's wrong here

    Formally documenting underperformance and initiating a performance improvement plan (PIP) is a structured, often HR-driven process that is typically reserved for situations where informal interventions have failed or the issue is severe and clearly understood. Implementing such a formal plan without first engaging in a private, empathetic conversation to understand the root causes is premature and can be perceived as overly bureaucratic or punitive, potentially damaging team morale and trust without addressing the underlying problem.

  • Reassign their tasks to other team members to maintain sprint velocity

    Why it's wrong here

    Reassigning tasks to other team members to maintain sprint velocity is a short-term tactical fix that fails to address the fundamental issue of the team member's consistent underperformance. This action can lead to an increased workload and potential burnout for other team members, mask the underlying problem, and prevent the individual from developing or resolving their challenges. A PMP's role involves developing team capabilities and resolving impediments, not merely shifting burdens without resolution.

About these practice questions

One of 800 original PMP practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.