PMP Process — Managing Technical Aspects Practice Question
During a sprint retrospective, several team members express frustration that the daily stand-ups are too long and not focused. As the Scrum Master, what is the BEST action to take?
⚠ Common exam trap
Test-takers frequently choose Option A because they mistakenly believe a strict 5-minute time-box is always the best solution, but the PMP exam emphasizes that the team must collaboratively decide on improvements rather than having the Scrum Master impose a rule.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Facilitate a discussion on how to improve the stand-up and agree on a time-box and focus
The Scrum Master's role is to facilitate the team's self-improvement, not impose solutions. By facilitating a discussion on how to improve the stand-up, the team collaboratively defines a time-box and focus, which directly addresses the root cause of frustration and aligns with the agile principle of continuous improvement. This approach ensures the team owns the solution, leading to better adherence and effectiveness.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Shorten the stand-up to 5 minutes regardless of the number of participants
Why it's wrong here
Arbitrarily shortening the daily stand-up to a fixed 5 minutes, irrespective of team size or the specific issues causing its inefficiency, is a prescriptive solution that fails to address the root cause of the team's concerns. This approach bypasses the opportunity for the team to collaboratively identify and implement sustainable improvements. A PMP understands that effective process improvement stems from team empowerment and problem-solving, not top-down mandates.
- ✗
Ask the product owner to attend the stand-up to enforce discipline
Why it's wrong here
Inviting the Product Owner to the daily stand-up specifically to enforce discipline fundamentally misinterprets their role within an Agile framework. The Product Owner is responsible for maximizing product value and managing the product backlog, not for facilitating team process or policing adherence to meeting guidelines. The Scrum Master, as the servant-leader, is accountable for coaching the team on self-organization and ensuring adherence to Scrum principles, including effective stand-ups.
- ✗
Cancel the stand-up and ask team members to send written updates
Why it's wrong here
Canceling the daily stand-up and replacing it with written updates eliminates the critical real-time, face-to-face communication and immediate coordination benefits inherent in this Agile ceremony. The stand-up's primary purpose is to foster quick synchronization, identify impediments collaboratively, and allow team members to adjust their plans based on others' progress. Written updates lack the dynamic interaction necessary for effective self-organizing teams to adapt daily.
- ✓
Facilitate a discussion on how to improve the stand-up and agree on a time-box and focus
Why this is correct
Facilitating a discussion during the sprint retrospective to collaboratively improve the daily stand-up aligns perfectly with Agile principles of self-organization and continuous improvement. This approach empowers the team to identify their own challenges, agree upon a suitable time-box, and define the meeting's focus, thereby fostering ownership and sustainable process enhancements. The Scrum Master's role is to guide this discussion, ensuring the team arrives at a practical and effective solution.
Go deeper
Related to this question
Learn chapter
Leading Teams and Empowering Team Members
Key term
Scrum Methodology
Scrum is a lightweight process framework that helps teams deliver complex projects in small, iterative chunks called sprints.
Key term
Sprint Retrospective
A Sprint Retrospective is a time-boxed meeting at the end of a Scrum sprint where the team reflects on their process and identifies improvements for the next sprint.
About these practice questions
One of 800 original PMP practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.