Resource Overallocation and Burnout Cause
Exhibit
Refer to the exhibit. ``` Resource Name: John Doe Role: Senior Developer Allocation: 100% (40 hrs/week) to Project Alpha Actual Hours (last 2 weeks): 55 hrs/week Project Health: On schedule, but developer reports burnout ```
A resource on a project has been consistently logging 12-14 hours of overtime per day for several weeks. Recently, the resource's productivity has declined and errors have increased. What is the MOST likely cause of the resource issue?
Quick Answer
The pattern described here, weeks of sustained twelve to fourteen hour days followed by falling productivity and rising errors, is the textbook signature of burnout, and recognizing that signature is the key skill this question is testing. Overwork degrades performance in a predictable way: as fatigue accumulates, attention and judgment decline even though the person may still be putting in more hours than ever, which is exactly the disconnect the scenario describes. This is different from a one-time estimation error, which would show up as a single missed deadline rather than a sustained decline in quality; it's also different from unplanned scope changes, which would typically show up as new or shifting work rather than a slow erosion of output on existing work; and it's different from simply being behind schedule, which explains why someone might work overtime but doesn't by itself explain why their error rate would climb over time. The consistency and duration of the overtime, combined with the compounding drop in quality, point specifically to overwork rather than any of those more situational explanations. On future questions, whenever a scenario pairs prolonged excessive hours with a described decline in output quality or errors, treat that combination as the signal for burnout rather than searching for an external or one-time cause.
⚠ Common exam trap
The trap is that candidates may attribute the overtime to schedule pressure or scope creep, but the scenario shows prolonged overtime with declining performance, directly pointing to overwork as the root cause, not just a symptom of being behind.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
The resource is overworked due to excessive overtime.
The scenario describes a consistent pattern of the resource working excessive overtime hours over an extended period, leading to diminishing productivity and increased errors. This is a classic sign of overwork and burnout, not a one-time estimation inaccuracy (A) or unplanned scope changes (B). While being behind schedule (C) might cause overtime, the persistent overtime with declining quality indicates overwork as the primary cause rather than a reactive response to schedule pressure. Therefore, D is correct.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
The resource estimation was inaccurate for the tasks.
Why it's wrong here
No evidence of estimation error; allocation is 40 hrs but actual is 55 hrs.
- ✗
Scope creep is causing additional unplanned work.
Why it's wrong here
No mention of scope changes; could be rework or poor planning.
- ✗
The project is behind schedule, forcing overtime.
Why it's wrong here
Project is on schedule per exhibit.
- ✓
The resource is overworked due to excessive overtime.
Why this is correct
Actual hours exceed allocation by 15 hrs/week, causing burnout.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every PMP question from scratch — 800 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
1 more way this is tested on PMP
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. Based on the resource histogram exhibit, what is the most likely impact on the project if no corrective action is taken?
hard- A.Scope creep will increase resource requirements.
- B.The project will likely finish ahead of schedule.
- ✓ C.Team burnout and decreased productivity will likely cause delays.
- D.The project will meet its schedule with overtime.
Why C: The resource histogram shows a significant overallocation of team members beyond their normal capacity for an extended period. Without corrective action such as leveling or adding resources, this sustained overwork leads to fatigue, reduced efficiency, and increased error rates, which typically cause schedule delays despite the initial appearance of progress.
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.