Courseiva
People — Leading ProjectseasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

PMP People — Leading Projects Practice Question

A junior team member consistently misses deadlines, affecting the project schedule. You have spoken to them twice about the issue, but performance has not improved. What should you do NEXT?

⚠ Common exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often jump to reassignment (Option A) or escalation (Option C) as 'decisive' actions, failing to recognize that the PM must first use interpersonal skills to diagnose and support the team member, as per the PMP's emphasis on leading people over managing tasks.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Meet with the team member privately to explore any obstacles or personal challenges.

The PM should first seek to understand the root cause of the performance issue through a private, supportive conversation. This aligns with the PMP's 'People' domain, emphasizing servant leadership and emotional intelligence. Exploring obstacles or personal challenges addresses potential underlying factors (e.g., unclear requirements, resource constraints, or personal stress) before escalating or reassigning work.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Reassign the tasks to another team member.

    Why it's wrong here

    Reassigning tasks to another team member is a reactive measure that fails to address the underlying cause of the junior team member's consistent missed deadlines. While it might temporarily mitigate the immediate impact on the project schedule, this approach neglects the opportunity for coaching and development. It also risks demotivating the original team member and potentially overburdens the new assignee, creating new project risks without resolving the core performance management challenge.

  • Meet with the team member privately to explore any obstacles or personal challenges.

    Why this is correct

    Meeting privately with the team member to understand potential obstacles or personal challenges exemplifies effective servant leadership and emotional intelligence in project management. This proactive approach prioritizes understanding the root causes of underperformance, which could range from skill gaps to workload issues or external factors. By offering a supportive and confidential environment, the project manager can identify specific interventions, provide necessary resources, or adjust expectations, thereby fostering trust and facilitating the team member's growth and improved project contributions.

  • Escalate the matter to the team member's functional manager.

    Why it's wrong here

    Escalating the matter directly to the team member's functional manager without prior direct intervention is generally premature and can be counterproductive. As a project manager, the initial responsibility is to attempt to resolve performance issues through direct communication, coaching, and support. Bypassing this crucial step can undermine the project manager's authority, damage trust with the team member, and may be perceived as an avoidance of direct performance management, making future collaborative problem-solving more difficult.

  • Ignore the issue to avoid conflict.

    Why it's wrong here

    Ignoring consistent missed deadlines to avoid conflict is a detrimental approach that undermines project success and team dynamics. This inaction allows performance issues to persist, potentially causing schedule delays, quality compromises, and increased costs for the project. Furthermore, it can negatively impact team morale as other members may perceive an inequitable distribution of workload or a lack of accountability, eroding the project manager's credibility and fostering a culture of underperformance.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every PMP question from scratch — 800 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.