A company has an on-premises data center and wants to connect it to Azure to extend their network. They require a dedicated, private, high-bandwidth connection that is not routed over the public internet. They also want a lower-cost backup connection for redundancy in case the primary connection fails. Which combination of connectivity options should they implement?
ExpressRoute provides a private, dedicated circuit with high bandwidth and low latency. A Site-to-Site VPN over the internet is a cost-effective backup that can be activated if ExpressRoute fails.
Why this answer
ExpressRoute provides a dedicated, private, high-bandwidth connection that bypasses the public internet, meeting the primary requirement. A Site-to-Site VPN over the internet serves as a cost-effective backup path for redundancy, as it uses encrypted tunnels over the public internet without the recurring costs of a second ExpressRoute circuit.
Exam trap
The trap here is that candidates often assume two ExpressRoute circuits are required for redundancy, overlooking the cost-effective alternative of using a Site-to-Site VPN as a backup, which still meets the redundancy requirement without the high cost of a second private connection.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option B is wrong because two active ExpressRoute circuits from different providers provide high availability but at a higher cost, not a lower-cost backup. Option C is wrong because a Site-to-Site VPN as the primary connection does not meet the requirement for a dedicated, private, high-bandwidth connection not routed over the public internet; Point-to-Site VPN is for individual client connections, not site-to-site redundancy. Option D is wrong because Azure VPN Gateway with active-passive mode and a second VPN Gateway for failover still uses the public internet, failing the private connection requirement, and is more complex and costly than a single VPN Gateway with active-passive mode.