- A
Use Azure Migrate to perform a lift-and-shift migration to Azure VMs
Lift-and-shift minimizes code changes by moving VMs as-is.
- B
Refactor the application to run in Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Why wrong: Refactoring requires significant code changes.
- C
Migrate the file share to Azure Files
Azure Files provides SMB file shares with minimal changes.
- D
Migrate the file share to Azure NetApp Files
Why wrong: Azure NetApp Files is also a file share but is not necessary; Azure Files is simpler.
- E
Rearchitect the application to use a microservices architecture
Why wrong: Rearchitecting is a major change and not minimal.
Quick Answer
The answer is to migrate the file share to Azure Files and use Azure Migrate for a lift-and-shift of the monolithic application. This combination is correct because it minimizes code changes by moving the existing VMs as-is while replacing the on-premises shared file system with Azure Files, which provides low-latency SMB access without refactoring the application’s architecture. On the AZ-305 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of migration strategies for legacy monolithic applications, where the key constraint is preserving code integrity. A common trap is choosing containerization or microservices, which require significant rework and violate the “minimize changes” requirement. Remember the memory tip: “Lift the VM, shift the share” — keep the app unchanged and swap the file storage to a managed Azure service.
AZ-305 Design infrastructure solutions Practice Question
This AZ-305 practice question tests your understanding of design infrastructure solutions. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
Your company plans to migrate a legacy on-premises application to Azure. The application has a monolithic architecture and requires low-latency access to a shared file system. You need to choose a migration strategy that minimizes changes to the application code. Which TWO options should you recommend? (Choose two.)
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Use Azure Migrate to perform a lift-and-shift migration to Azure VMs
Option A and Option D are correct. Azure Migrate with lift-and-shift moves VMs as-is, minimizing code changes. Azure Files provides a managed file share that can be accessed via SMB. Option B is wrong because refactoring to containers requires code changes. Option C is wrong because Azure NetApp Files is also a file share but is more expensive and complex for this scenario. Option E is wrong because rearchitecting to microservices is a major change.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Use Azure Migrate to perform a lift-and-shift migration to Azure VMs
Why this is correct
Lift-and-shift minimizes code changes by moving VMs as-is.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Refactor the application to run in Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Why it's wrong here
Refactoring requires significant code changes.
- ✓
Migrate the file share to Azure Files
Why this is correct
Azure Files provides SMB file shares with minimal changes.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Migrate the file share to Azure NetApp Files
Why it's wrong here
Azure NetApp Files is also a file share but is not necessary; Azure Files is simpler.
- ✗
Rearchitect the application to use a microservices architecture
Why it's wrong here
Rearchitecting is a major change and not minimal.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
- Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.
TExam Day Tips
- Underline the problem statement mentally.
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which AZ-305 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
- →
Design infrastructure solutions — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Design infrastructure solutions practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All AZ-305 questions
999 questions across all exam domains
- →
Microsoft Azure Solutions Architect Expert AZ-305 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
AZ-305 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related AZ-305 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Design identity, governance, and monitoring solutions practice questions
Practise AZ-305 questions linked to Design identity, governance, and monitoring solutions.
Design data storage solutions practice questions
Practise AZ-305 questions linked to Design data storage solutions.
Design business continuity solutions practice questions
Practise AZ-305 questions linked to Design business continuity solutions.
Design infrastructure solutions practice questions
Practise AZ-305 questions linked to Design infrastructure solutions.
SAA-C03 VPC practice questions
Practise AZ-305 questions linked to SAA-C03 VPC.
SAA-C03 S3 lifecycle policy questions
Practise AZ-305 questions linked to SAA-C03 S3 lifecycle policy questions.
SAA-C03 RDS Multi-AZ questions
Practise AZ-305 questions linked to SAA-C03 RDS Multi-AZ questions.
SAA-C03 IAM policy practice questions
Practise AZ-305 questions linked to SAA-C03 IAM policy.
SAA-C03 Route 53 failover questions
Practise AZ-305 questions linked to SAA-C03 Route 53 failover questions.
SAA-C03 CloudFront practice questions
Practise AZ-305 questions linked to SAA-C03 CloudFront.
SAA-C03 NAT gateway questions
Practise AZ-305 questions linked to SAA-C03 NAT gateway questions.
SAA-C03 VPC endpoint questions
Practise AZ-305 questions linked to SAA-C03 VPC endpoint questions.
Practice this exam
Start a free AZ-305 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this AZ-305 question test?
Design infrastructure solutions — This question tests Design infrastructure solutions — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Use Azure Migrate to perform a lift-and-shift migration to Azure VMs — Option A and Option D are correct. Azure Migrate with lift-and-shift moves VMs as-is, minimizing code changes. Azure Files provides a managed file share that can be accessed via SMB. Option B is wrong because refactoring to containers requires code changes. Option C is wrong because Azure NetApp Files is also a file share but is more expensive and complex for this scenario. Option E is wrong because rearchitecting to microservices is a major change.
What should I do if I get this AZ-305 question wrong?
Identify which AZ-305 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 20, 2026
This AZ-305 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the AZ-305 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.