A company hosts documents in Azure Blob Storage. The files must remain available if one availability zone in the region fails. Which redundancy option should the administrator choose?
ZRS places copies of the data across availability zones in the same region, which helps the storage remain available during a zone failure.
Why this answer
B is correct because Zone-Redundant Storage (ZRS) synchronously replicates data across three Azure availability zones within a primary region, ensuring data remains accessible if one zone fails. This meets the requirement for high availability within a single region without relying on a secondary region.
Exam trap
The trap here is that candidates often confuse LRS (three copies in one datacenter) with zone-level redundancy, or they incorrectly assume GRS or RA-GRS are needed for intra-region availability, when ZRS is the correct choice for zone failure protection within a single region.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because Locally Redundant Storage (LRS) replicates data three times within a single datacenter, not across availability zones, so it does not protect against an entire zone failure. Option C is wrong because Geo-Redundant Storage (GRS) replicates data to a secondary region, but it does not provide zone-level redundancy within the primary region; it also does not automatically enable reads from the secondary region without manual failover or RA-GRS. Option D is wrong because Read-Access Geo-Redundant Storage (RA-GRS) provides a secondary read-only copy in another region, but it is not the only option with a secondary copy (GRS also has one), and it does not address zone failure within the primary region.