mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A finance team stores PDF statements in Azure Blob Storage. The workload must survive a zone failure in the primary region, and if the entire region becomes unavailable, auditors still need read-only access to the copies in the secondary region. Which redundancy option should you choose?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A finance team stores PDF statements in Azure Blob Storage. The workload must survive a zone failure in the primary region, and if the entire region becomes unavailable, auditors still need read-only access to the copies in the secondary region. Which redundancy option should you choose?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

ZRS, because it keeps copies across zones but does not replicate to another region.

ZRS protects against a zone outage within one region, but it does not provide geo-replication or secondary-region read access.

B

Best answer

RA-GZRS, because it combines zone redundancy with geo-replication and read access to the secondary region.

RA-GZRS is designed for exactly this requirement. It replicates data across zones in the primary region and also asynchronously replicates to a paired secondary region. The read-access feature means you can still retrieve data from the secondary endpoint if the primary region is unavailable, which is useful for audit or continuity scenarios.

C

Distractor review

LRS, because it keeps three copies in a single datacenter and is sufficient for regional resilience.

LRS protects only against localized hardware failures in one datacenter. It does not handle zone failures or regional outages.

D

Distractor review

GRS, because it provides geo-replication and always allows direct reads from the secondary region.

GRS adds geo-replication, but the secondary region is not readable unless you choose the read-access variant. It also does not provide zone redundancy in the primary region.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: RA-GZRS, because it combines zone redundancy with geo-replication and read access to the secondary region. — RA-GZRS is the best fit because it addresses both failure domains in the requirement. Zone redundancy keeps the primary workload protected against a zone failure, while geo-replication protects against a regional outage. The read-access capability is important here because auditors must be able to open the data from the secondary region if the primary region is down. That combination is more resilient than ZRS or GRS alone. Why others are wrong: ZRS helps with zone failure only, so it misses the secondary-region read requirement. LRS is limited to a single datacenter and is not sufficient for either zone or regional resilience. GRS replicates to another region, but the primary region is not zone-redundant and the secondary endpoint is not readable unless RA-GRS or RA-GZRS is selected.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.