hardmultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A media archive stores large video files that must survive a zone failure in the primary region and also be replicated to a paired region for disaster recovery. The archive team does not want anyone to read from the secondary region during normal operations, and cost should be lower than the read-access variant. Which redundancy option should you configure?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

A media archive stores large video files that must survive a zone failure in the primary region and also be replicated to a paired region for disaster recovery. The archive team does not want anyone to read from the secondary region during normal operations, and cost should be lower than the read-access variant. Which redundancy option should you configure?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

LRS, because it keeps copies in a single datacenter and is the lowest-cost option.

LRS keeps data within one datacenter set, so it does not meet zone or regional resilience needs.

B

Distractor review

ZRS, because it protects against zone failures but not regional outages.

ZRS handles zone failure, but it does not replicate the data to another region for disaster recovery.

C

Best answer

GZRS, because it adds zone redundancy and geo-replication without enabling secondary read access.

GZRS matches the requirement precisely. It protects the data from a zone failure by distributing copies across availability zones in the primary region. It also replicates the data to a paired secondary region for disaster recovery. Because the team does not want secondary read access during normal operations, the non-read-access version is the correct and typically lower-cost choice compared with RA-GZRS.

D

Distractor review

RA-GRS, because the read-access copy is needed whenever data is replicated to another region.

RA-GRS provides geo-replication and secondary read access, but it does not provide zone redundancy in the primary region.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: GZRS, because it adds zone redundancy and geo-replication without enabling secondary read access. — GZRS is the only option that satisfies both resilience requirements without adding unnecessary read access to the secondary region. It protects against a zone outage in the primary region and also maintains a geo-replicated copy in another region for recovery from a regional failure. Because the archive team explicitly does not want secondary read access, RA-GZRS would add functionality they do not need and usually increases cost. Why others are wrong: LRS has no zone or regional protection. ZRS covers zone failure only and cannot protect against a regional outage. RA-GRS gives regional replication and read access, but it does not provide zone redundancy in the primary region, so it misses the zone-failure requirement.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.