mediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped
PK0-005 Practice Question: A project manager for a software development…
You are a project manager for a software development company that uses an Agile methodology with two-week sprints. The team uses Jira for task tracking and Confluence for documentation. During the latest sprint review, stakeholders expressed confusion about the current project status because the burndown chart shows a steady increase in remaining work. Upon investigation, you discover that the development team has been adding new tasks to the current sprint without updating the sprint backlog or adjusting the scope. The product owner is unaware of these additions. The team complains that they are overworked and missing deadlines. Which of the following is the BEST course of action to address the situation?
⚠ Common exam trap
Test-takers frequently choose Option A (stop adding tasks) as a quick fix, but it fails to address the existing unauthorized tasks and the need for product owner involvement to reset the sprint backlog in Jira.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Hold a meeting with the product owner and the team to review the sprint backlog, remove unauthorized tasks, and reinforce the importance of scope management.
It directly addresses the root cause: unauthorized scope changes. The burndown chart's steady increase indicates unapproved tasks inflating the sprint backlog. By holding a meeting with the product owner and team, you can review Jira's sprint backlog, remove unauthorized tasks, and reinforce Agile scope management—ensuring the product owner controls the backlog and the burndown chart accurately reflects progress.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Tell the team to stop adding tasks to the sprint and focus only on the original scope.
Why it's wrong here
This directive may stop the immediate behavior but does not address the lack of a formal change control process or involve the product owner.
- ✓
Hold a meeting with the product owner and the team to review the sprint backlog, remove unauthorized tasks, and reinforce the importance of scope management.
Why this is correct
This addresses the root cause by re-establishing proper scope management, involving the product owner, and educating the team on the process.
- ✗
Add two more developers to the team to help handle the increased workload.
Why it's wrong here
Adding resources mid-sprint often causes more overhead and does not solve the process issue of unauthorized scope changes.
- ✗
Extend the sprint by one week to give the team time to complete all the added tasks.
Why it's wrong here
This rewards scope creep and does not prevent it in future sprints; it also sets a bad precedent.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every PK0-005 question from scratch — 980 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This PK0-005 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PK0-005 exam.