Courseiva
Tools and Documentation →mediumMultiple Choice

PK0-005 Tools and Documentation Practice Question

During a sprint review, the team shows that they completed 30 story points this sprint, which is consistent with their average velocity. The product owner asks how much work the team can likely complete in the next two sprints. Using velocity, what is the best estimate?

⚠ Common exam trap

PK0-005 often tests simple velocity math, and candidates either forget to multiply by the number of sprints or confuse velocity (per sprint) with total capacity — the trap is picking the single-sprint number (30) instead of the two-sprint forecast (60).

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

60 story points

Velocity is the average amount of work (in story points) a team completes per sprint. If the team consistently completes 30 story points per sprint, then over two sprints the expected throughput is 30 × 2 = 60 story points. This is the standard velocity-based forecasting method in Agile.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    30 story points

    Why it's wrong here

    Thirty points covers only one sprint, ignoring the second entirely, so it understates the two-sprint forecast. It tempts because 30 is the confirmed average velocity, which is the correct figure for a single sprint rather than the two requested.

  • ✗

    90 story points

    Why it's wrong here

    Ninety points assumes 45 per sprint, exceeding the stated average velocity of 30, so it overstates capacity. It tempts as a rough doubling of the two-sprint horizon, but velocity forecasting multiplies the known average by the sprint count, giving 60.

  • ✓

    60 story points

    Why this is correct

    Velocity of 30 story points per sprint, sustained over two sprints, gives 30 × 2 = 60 story points. This satisfies the stem's constraint that the team performs consistently with its average velocity, making straight extrapolation the best estimate.

  • ✗

    45 story points

    Why it's wrong here

    Forty-five points implies 22.5 per sprint, which contradicts the established average velocity of 30. It tempts as a split of the 90-point figure, but velocity-based forecasting simply multiplies the average by the number of sprints, yielding 60.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every PK0-005 question from scratch — 954 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official CompTIA exam blueprint

This PK0-005 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PK0-005 exam.