Question 421 of 500
Project Management ConceptseasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is the risk of rework due to incomplete deliverables from previous phases. Fast-tracking compresses the schedule by overlapping phases that would normally run sequentially, which means a later phase begins before the earlier phase’s outputs are fully verified. This creates a high probability of rework if those incomplete deliverables contain errors or require changes, potentially erasing any time gains and destabilizing the schedule. On the CompTIA Project+ PK0-005 exam, this concept tests your understanding that fast-tracking trades schedule compression for increased risk, not cost reduction—a common trap is confusing it with crashing, which adds resources. A useful memory tip: think of fast-tracking as “racing before the finish line,” where you risk having to re-run the race if the first lap was wrong.

PK0-005 Project Management Concepts Practice Question

This PK0-005 practice question tests your understanding of project management concepts. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A project manager is assigned to a new project that has a tight deadline. The sponsor wants to fast-track the project by overlapping some phases. Which project management concept should the PM be most concerned about regarding this approach?

Question 1easymultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Risk of rework due to incomplete deliverables from previous phases.

Fast-tracking involves overlapping project phases that would normally be sequential. The primary risk is that work on a later phase begins before the deliverables from the previous phase are fully complete and verified. This increases the probability of rework if the earlier deliverables contain errors or require changes, which can negate any time savings and introduce schedule instability.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Longer overall project duration.

    Why it's wrong here

    Fast-tracking is intended to shorten, not lengthen, duration.

  • Risk of rework due to incomplete deliverables from previous phases.

    Why this is correct

    Fast-tracking increases the likelihood of rework because activities are overlapped before prior deliverables are complete.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Increased cost of additional resources.

    Why it's wrong here

    While cost may increase, it is not the primary concern; fast-tracking primarily affects risk.

  • Reduced quality of final product.

    Why it's wrong here

    Quality might suffer if rework occurs, but the immediate risk is rework.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

CompTIA often tests the distinction between fast-tracking (overlapping phases) and crashing (adding resources), and the trap here is that candidates mistakenly focus on cost or duration rather than the core risk of rework from incomplete predecessor deliverables.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

In project management, fast-tracking is a schedule compression technique that applies leads to logical relationships (e.g., start-to-start with a lag). The critical path method (CPM) shows that overlapping phases increases the number of activities with finish-to-start dependencies that are now partially parallel, amplifying the impact of any variance in predecessor completion. In practice, this often manifests as increased change requests and defect rates during integration testing, as seen in software projects where coding begins before requirements are fully baselined.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the PK0-005 exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related PK0-005 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free PK0-005 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this PK0-005 question test?

Project Management Concepts — This question tests Project Management Concepts — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Risk of rework due to incomplete deliverables from previous phases. — Fast-tracking involves overlapping project phases that would normally be sequential. The primary risk is that work on a later phase begins before the deliverables from the previous phase are fully complete and verified. This increases the probability of rework if the earlier deliverables contain errors or require changes, which can negate any time savings and introduce schedule instability.

What should I do if I get this PK0-005 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 30, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This PK0-005 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PK0-005 exam.