Which TWO statements are true regarding VLAN configuration, 802.1Q trunking, and the native VLAN?
Changing the native VLAN from the default VLAN 1 to an unused VLAN is a Cisco-recommended hardening step because VLAN 1 is well-documented and often carries control-plane traffic such as CDP, VTP, and PAgP. Attackers can exploit the default native VLAN to launch double-tagging (VLAN hopping) attacks, so moving native VLAN to a dedicated unused VLAN reduces the risk of layer 2 traffic being intercepted or misforwarded. Additionally, using an unused VLAN ensures that no legitimate user traffic is accidentally sent untagged on the trunk, which prevents VLAN misclassification.
Why this answer
Changing the native VLAN from the default VLAN 1 to an unused VLAN is a recommended security best practice to prevent VLAN hopping attacks. Option D is correct because 802.1Q uses a 12-bit VLAN ID field, allowing VLAN IDs from 1 to 4094 (0 and 4095 are reserved). Option A is false: on an 802.1Q trunk, frames in the native VLAN are typically sent untagged.
Option C is false: 802.1Q is an IEEE standard, not Cisco proprietary (ISL is Cisco proprietary). Option E is false: the native VLAN does not have to match on both ends; mismatched native VLANs can cause traffic to be misclassified but the trunk will still operate.
Exam trap
Cisco often tests the misconception that 802.1Q is proprietary (it is not) and that native VLAN frames are always tagged (they are untagged by default), leading candidates to incorrectly select options A or C.
Why the other options are wrong
The native VLAN is specifically the VLAN that does not get a tag; all other VLANs are tagged.
802.1Q is an open standard, whereas ISL was Cisco proprietary.
Mismatched native VLANs can lead to security vulnerabilities and misrouting, but the trunk itself may still come up.