Two switches should form an LACP EtherChannel. One side is configured passive, and the other side is also passive. What is the most likely result?
In LACP, the 'passive' mode waits for an incoming LACP PDU and never sends one on its own. Since both switches are configured as passive, neither end transmits the initial LACP negotiation frames required to detect the peer and agree on link parameters, so the EtherChannel remains in a down or unattached state. LACP requires at least one side to be 'active' to begin the exchange.
Why this answer
If both sides are passive, the EtherChannel is unlikely to form because passive mode waits for the other side to initiate LACP negotiation. In plain language, both switches are listening, but neither is actively starting the conversation. Because neither side takes the active role, the bundle normally stays down or unformed unless one side is changed to active.
This is a classic LACP negotiation question. It reinforces the difference between valid pairings such as active/active or active/passive and the passive/passive pairing that usually fails to initiate negotiation.
Exam trap
Remember, passive mode waits for the other side to initiate. Ensure at least one side is active to form an EtherChannel.
Why the other options are wrong
Passive mode does not initiate LACP negotiation; it only responds to incoming LACP packets. Active mode is the one that actively sends LACP packets. Therefore, passive mode is not stronger than active mode.
LACP configuration does not change the interface type; it only bundles multiple physical links into a logical EtherChannel. The interface remains a Layer 2 or Layer 3 port based on its configuration, not a routed port automatically.
Passive mode does not cause the switch to delete the port-channel configuration. The configuration remains, but the EtherChannel will not come up because no LACP negotiation occurs.