Courseiva
Network Infrastructure and ConnectivityhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CCNA Network Infrastructure and Connectivity Practice Question

Exhibit

SwitchA# show interfaces gigabitethernet 0/1
GigabitEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up
  Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is aaaa.bbbb.cccc (bia aaaa.bbbb.cccc)
  Internet address is 192.168.1.1/30
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
  Keepalive set (10 sec)
  Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s, media type is SFP
  output flow-control is off, input flow-control is off
  ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
  Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never
  Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:05:00
  Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
  Queueing strategy: fifo
  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
  5 minute input rate 1000 bits/sec, 1 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 1000 bits/sec, 1 packets/sec
     0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer
     Received 0 broadcasts (0 IP multicasts)
     0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
     0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
     0 watchdog, 0 multicast, 0 pause input
     0 input packets with dribble condition detected
     0 packets output, 0 bytes, 0 underruns
     0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
     0 unknown protocol drops
     0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
     0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 pause output
     0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

A network engineer is troubleshooting a link between two Cisco switches that are connected via a 1000BASE-LX SFP transceiver. Hosts on VLAN 10 on Switch A cannot ping the default gateway on Switch B. The interface on Switch A is up, but the engineer notices CRC errors incrementing. What should the engineer do to resolve this issue?

⚠ Common exam trap

Cisco often tests the misconception that CRC errors always indicate a bad cable or transceiver, when in fact the root cause can be a mode mismatch between LX optics and multimode fiber that is fixed with a mode-conditioning patch cable rather than replacing the fiber or transceiver.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Use a mode-conditioning patch cable between the SFP and the fiber patch panel

The 1000BASE-LX SFP transceiver operates at 1310 nm over single-mode fiber (SMF). When connected to multimode fiber (MMF), the larger core diameter causes excessive modal dispersion, leading to CRC errors. A mode-conditioning patch cable (mode-conditioning patch cord) launches the laser off-center into the MMF core, reducing differential mode delay and restoring proper signal integrity. This is a known Cisco best practice for LX transceivers on MMF links.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Replace the SFP with a 1000BASE-SX transceiver

    Why it's wrong here

    1000BASE-SX is for multimode fiber only, but the transceiver is already LX (single-mode).

  • Use a mode-conditioning patch cable between the SFP and the fiber patch panel

    Why this is correct

    A mode-conditioning patch cable corrects the mismatch when using a single-mode transceiver over multimode fiber, preventing signal dispersion.

  • Configure the same VLAN on both switch interfaces

    Why it's wrong here

    VLAN mismatch would cause the line protocol to be down, not CRC errors.

  • Replace the fiber cable with a single-mode fiber cable

    Why it's wrong here

    While this would also fix the mismatch, the question asks for the most likely cause given the symptom of CRC errors.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The 200-301 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

Use a mode-conditioning patch cable between the SFP and the fiber patch panelCorrect answer

Why this is correct

A mode-conditioning patch cable corrects the mismatch when using a single-mode transceiver over multimode fiber, preventing signal dispersion.

Replace the SFP with a 1000BASE-SX transceiverWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Using SX would not fix the issue because the fiber is multimode and LX is designed for longer distances; the problem is the cable type mismatch, not the transceiver type.

Configure the same VLAN on both switch interfacesWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

The interface is up/up, so VLAN mismatch is not the issue.

Replace the fiber cable with a single-mode fiber cableWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Although replacing with single-mode fiber would work, the exhibit does not show CRC errors, so the problem is more likely a mode-conditioning issue.

Analysis generated from the official 200-301blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Visual reference

Client Recursive Resolver Root DNS (13 root servers) TLD DNS (.com, .org, …) Authoritative example.com query IP addr answer

About these practice questions

This 200-301 question is part of Courseiva's 1,389-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 200-301 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-301 exam.