Courseiva
Switching and Network AccesshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CCNA Switching and Network Access Practice Question

Exhibit

Corrective action applied:
- Both Gi0/1 and Gi0/2 on both switches now use trunk mode
- channel-group 1 mode active remains configured

Which command output would be the best next step to verify whether the port-channel is operational after configuration changes?

⚠ Common exam trap

Avoid confusing general interface or trunk status with specific EtherChannel status. Always use the command that directly addresses the feature in question.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

show etherchannel summary

The best next step is to check EtherChannel status directly. In practical terms, after fixing the member-link configuration, the quickest verification is to inspect the summary output that shows whether the bundle exists and whether the member ports are actively participating. That is more direct than checking unrelated switching or routing tables. This is a simulation-style 'what do you verify next' question, which is important for realistic CCNA prep.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • show etherchannel summary

    Why this is correct

    This command displays the EtherChannel bundle status, including the port-channel interface, member ports, and their state (e.g., LACP, PAgP, or static). It directly shows whether the port channel is up and which physical interfaces are bundled, making it the best next step to confirm EtherChannel operation.

  • show ip ospf neighbor

    Why it's wrong here

    This verifies OSPF adjacency, which is a Layer 3 control-plane function. EtherChannel is a Layer 2 bundling technology; OSPF could be up over an individual member link even if the EtherChannel is not formed properly, so it doesn't validate the channel.

    When this WOULD be correct

    In a different scenario where the question asks about verifying OSPF neighbor relationships after configuring OSPF on a router, 'show ip ospf neighbor' would be the correct command to check if OSPF is functioning properly and neighbors are established.

  • show ip route

    Why it's wrong here

    This shows the routing table, which is not relevant to verifying the Layer 2 or Layer 3 port-channel membership. Even if EtherChannel is misconfigured, the routing table might still appear valid for other interfaces, so it doesn't provide any diagnostic information about the bundle status.

    When this WOULD be correct

    In a scenario where the question asks for verification of routing paths and connectivity issues, 'show ip route' would be the correct command to determine if routes are correctly established and if traffic can be forwarded through the configured interfaces.

  • show access-lists

    Why it's wrong here

    This displays ACL configuration and match counters. ACLs are not involved in the formation or verification of EtherChannel; they filter traffic, and their output gives no indication of whether member ports are correctly aggregated, nor any status of the bundle.

    When this WOULD be correct

    In a different exam scenario where the question asks about troubleshooting traffic filtering or security policies, 'show access-lists' would be the correct command to verify which traffic is permitted or denied based on configured access lists.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The 200-301 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

show etherchannel summaryCorrect answer

Why this is correct

This command displays the EtherChannel bundle status, including the port-channel interface, member ports, and their state (e.g., LACP, PAgP, or static). It directly shows whether the port channel is up and which physical interfaces are bundled, making it the best next step to confirm EtherChannel operation.

show ip ospf neighborWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

The command 'show ip ospf neighbor' is used to display OSPF neighbor relationships, which is not directly related to verifying the operational status of a port-channel. This command would not provide information about the port-channel configuration or status.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

In a different scenario where the question asks about verifying OSPF neighbor relationships after configuring OSPF on a router, 'show ip ospf neighbor' would be the correct command to check if OSPF is functioning properly and neighbors are established.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may choose this option because they associate OSPF with network connectivity and assume that verifying OSPF neighbors could indirectly indicate the status of the port-channel, especially if they are not fully aware of the specific commands for EtherChannel verification.

show ip routeWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

The command 'show ip route' is used to display the routing table of a device, which does not provide information about the operational status of a port-channel after configuration changes.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

In a scenario where the question asks for verification of routing paths and connectivity issues, 'show ip route' would be the correct command to determine if routes are correctly established and if traffic can be forwarded through the configured interfaces.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates might choose this option because they associate port-channel functionality with routing, thinking that verifying the routing table could indirectly confirm connectivity through the port-channel.

show access-listsWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

The command 'show access-lists' is not relevant for verifying the operational status of a port-channel; it focuses on access control lists rather than link aggregation status.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

In a different exam scenario where the question asks about troubleshooting traffic filtering or security policies, 'show access-lists' would be the correct command to verify which traffic is permitted or denied based on configured access lists.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may choose this option because they associate access lists with traffic management and might mistakenly believe that verifying access lists is part of checking overall link functionality.

Analysis generated from the official 200-301blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Visual reference

R1 R2 R3 R4 10 100 10 100 OSPF picks R1→R2→R4 (cost 20) over R1→R3→R4 (cost 200)

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every 200-301 question from scratch — 1,389 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 200-301 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-301 exam.