Scrum Master Coaching Product Owner on Sprint Stability
In a Scrum team, the product owner frequently changes priorities during the sprint, causing the team to lose focus. The team has raised this concern in the retrospective. What should the scrum master do?
Quick Answer
The answer is to coach the product owner on the importance of stable sprint goals. This is correct because the Scrum framework mandates that once a sprint begins, the sprint goal should remain fixed to protect the team’s focus and enable a potentially releasable increment; frequent priority changes violate this core principle. On the Project Management Professional PMP exam, this scenario tests your understanding of the Scrum Master’s servant-leader role in safeguarding the process, often appearing as a distractor where candidates mistakenly escalate to management or adjust the sprint backlog directly. A common trap is choosing to “reprioritize with the team,” which undermines sprint stability, whereas coaching addresses the root cause. Remember the mnemonic “Coach, Don’t Change” — the Scrum Master coaches the product owner on sprint stability rather than changing the sprint itself.
⚠ Common exam trap
Watch out — candidates often confuse the Product Owner's authority to reorder the Product Backlog with the ability to change Sprint priorities mid-sprint, leading them to choose Option B under the misconception that value trumps process.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Coach the product owner on the importance of stable sprint goals.
The Scrum Master is responsible for ensuring the Scrum framework is followed. Changing priorities mid-sprint violates the principle of a stable Sprint Goal, which protects the team from disruption and allows them to deliver a potentially releasable increment. Coaching the Product Owner on this principle directly addresses the root cause without bypassing Scrum rules or escalating prematurely.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Coach the product owner on the importance of stable sprint goals.
Why this is correct
The scrum master's role includes coaching the product owner on Scrum practices.
- ✗
Allow the changes if they add value, and adjust the sprint backlog.
Why it's wrong here
Changing the sprint goal mid-sprint disrupts the team and Scrum principles.
- ✗
Update the definition of done to accommodate changes.
Why it's wrong here
The definition of done is about quality, not scope changes.
- ✗
Escalate the issue to the project sponsor.
Why it's wrong here
Escalation bypasses the Scrum Master's responsibility to coach the Product Owner on respecting Sprint boundaries and protecting the team from external disruptions. This action ignores the self-organising nature of Agile frameworks by seeking hierarchical intervention for an internal process conflict. You would only escalate to a sponsor if the issue involved significant budget changes or fundamental shifts in project viability that exceed the authority of the Scrum Team.
Go deeper
Related to this question
Learn chapter
Leading Teams and Empowering Team Members
Key term
Scrum Methodology
Scrum is a lightweight process framework that helps teams deliver complex projects in small, iterative chunks called sprints.
Key term
Sprint Planning
Sprint Planning is a time-boxed meeting at the start of a Scrum sprint where the team decides what work they can deliver and how they will do it.
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every PMP question from scratch — 800 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
1 more way this is tested on PMP
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. In a Scrum team, the product owner frequently changes priorities within a sprint, causing the team to abandon work mid-task. The team is becoming demotivated. What should the scrum master do?
hard- A.Escalate the issue to the project sponsor to overrule the product owner
- B.Shorten the sprint length to two or three days to accommodate frequent changes
- C.Accept the changes as the product owner has authority over priorities
- ✓ D.Coach the product owner on the impact of changing priorities mid-sprint and reinforce the sprint backlog agreement
Why D: The Scrum Master's primary role is to coach the Product Owner and the team on Scrum principles, including the importance of a stable Sprint Backlog. Changing priorities mid-sprint violates the Sprint Goal and undermines team focus, leading to demotivation. By reinforcing the Sprint Backlog agreement, the Scrum Master protects the team from disruption while respecting the Product Owner's authority outside the sprint.
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.