PMP Process — Managing Technical Aspects Practice Question
During a project, an executive stakeholder bypasses the project manager and directly instructs a team member to add a new feature. The team member is already overloaded. What should the project manager do FIRST?
⚠ Common exam trap
Test-takers frequently choose Option B (escalation) because they think the executive's authority requires immediate higher-level intervention, but the PMP exam emphasizes that the project manager should first attempt to resolve the issue directly with the stakeholder using communication and process explanation before escalating.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Speak with the executive stakeholder privately to explain the change control process and the impact of the request.
The project manager must first address the unauthorized change directly with the executive stakeholder, explaining the formal change control process and the impact on scope, schedule, and resources. This aligns with the PMBOK Guide's principle of managing stakeholder expectations and protecting the project from uncontrolled scope creep, which is a key technical aspect of project integration management.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Instruct the team member to follow the executive's order to maintain good relations.
Why it's wrong here
Instructing the team member to follow an unauthorized directive directly undermines the project manager's authority and the established project governance framework, specifically the change control process. This action bypasses formal review, leading to uncontrolled scope creep, potential resource conflicts, and jeopardizes project objectives and baselines. It prioritizes short-term "good relations" over project integrity and the PM's responsibility to protect the project scope and team.
- ✗
Escalate the issue to the sponsor and request intervention.
Why it's wrong here
Escalating to the sponsor bypasses the project manager’s direct authority to manage stakeholder communication and team workload. The PM should first address the stakeholder directly to clarify the change request process and protect the team member from unauthorised directives. This option is tempting because escalation to the sponsor is correct when the stakeholder refuses to comply or the issue exceeds the PM’s authority, but here the PM has not yet attempted direct resolution.
- ✓
Speak with the executive stakeholder privately to explain the change control process and the impact of the request.
Why this is correct
This is the most appropriate first step for a PMP, demonstrating proactive stakeholder management and reinforcing project governance. By privately explaining the established change control process and detailing the potential impacts (e.g., schedule delays, budget overruns, resource reallocation) of bypassing it, the project manager educates the executive while maintaining professional relations and protecting the project's integrity. This approach seeks resolution at the lowest possible level.
- ✗
Update the issue log and continue with the original plan.
Why it's wrong here
While updating the issue log is a correct administrative step for documenting any deviation, simply logging the issue and proceeding with the original plan is insufficient and irresponsible. This approach fails to address the immediate risk of an unauthorized directive being implemented, potentially causing confusion for the team member, undermining the project manager's authority, and allowing a significant deviation from the approved project baseline to persist without resolution. It is passive and reactive, rather than proactive problem-solving.
Go deeper
Related to this question
Learn chapter
Introduction to the PMP Exam and Project Management Basics
Key term
Change Control Process
A formal, structured procedure used to manage any changes to a project's scope, schedule, budget, or requirements, ensuring every modification is reviewed, approved, tested, and documented before implementation.
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every PMP question from scratch — 800 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.