PRINCE2F Practice Question: Overview of PRINCE2 and the project environment
You are the project manager for a large-scale IT infrastructure project in a multinational corporation. The project has completed its initiation stage and is about to start the first delivery stage. The project board has approved the project plan and the business case. However, during the initiation stage, the team encountered significant issues with resource availability due to a company-wide reorganization. Several key team members have been reassigned to other projects, and the project's budget has been reduced by 15%. The project board has asked you to proceed with the first delivery stage as planned. As a PRINCE2 practitioner, what is the most appropriate course of action?
⚠ Common exam trap
Many exam-takers think updating the risk register (Option B) is sufficient, but PRINCE2 treats actual budget cuts and resource losses as issues that require formal re-planning and re-approval, not just risk mitigation.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Inform the project board that the stage cannot proceed as planned and request a review of the project plan and business case.
A is correct because PRINCE2 requires that the project remains viable against its business case and plans before proceeding to the next stage. The significant resource reassignments and 15% budget reduction fundamentally alter the project's baseline, making the approved project plan and business case invalid. The project manager must escalate this to the project board for a formal review and re-approval, as proceeding without addressing these changes violates the 'continued business justification' principle.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Inform the project board that the stage cannot proceed as planned and request a review of the project plan and business case.
Why this is correct
The reduced budget and lost key resources invalidate the approved plan's assumptions, so proceeding would breach PRINCE2's continued business justification principle. The project manager must escalate via exception, asking the Board to review the plan and business case rather than silently continuing.
- ✗
Update the risk register with the resource and budget issues and proceed with the stage as planned.
Why it's wrong here
Logging the issues in the risk register treats an already-materialised tolerance breach as a future uncertainty, so the stage proceeds without an exception plan or board decision. Risk-register updates suit emerging threats within tolerance; here the budget reduction and lost resources have already occurred, demanding escalation.
- ✗
Proceed with the first delivery stage using the existing approved plans, but closely monitor resource usage.
Why it's wrong here
Monitoring resource usage does not address the forecast breach of stage tolerances; PRINCE2 requires escalating to the project board and producing an exception plan before continuing. Close monitoring suits stages running within agreed tolerances, where the project manager's delegated authority still covers the deviation.
- ✗
Adjust the project plan and resource allocations to fit the new budget and proceed without further authorization.
Why it's wrong here
Any change to the approved plan, budget or resources requires project board authorisation via an exception plan; proceeding unilaterally breaches PRINCE2's continued business justification and management-by-exception principles. Adjusting allocations is tempting because the board asked you to proceed, but that instruction cannot override the tolerance breach triggered by the 15% budget cut.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
This PRINCE2F question is part of Courseiva's 1,189-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
1 more way this is tested on PRINCE2F
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. Which PRINCE2 principle requires that a project continues to be desirable, viable, and achievable?
easy- A.Manage by stages
- B.Tailor to suit the project environment
- ✓ C.Continued business justification
- D.Learn from experience
Why C: The PRINCE2 principle of continued business justification requires that a project remains desirable (aligned with business objectives), viable (feasible within constraints), and achievable (realistic in scope and resources) throughout its lifecycle. This principle mandates that the business justification is formally reviewed and updated at key decision points, such as stage boundaries, to ensure the project is still worth undertaking.
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This PRINCE2F practice question is part of Courseiva's free PeopleCert certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PRINCE2F exam.