Question 511 of 975

Quick Answer

The answer is the Conditional Access policy’s sign-in frequency session control. This setting forces users to re-authenticate with MFA at a defined interval—such as every hour—overriding any device compliance or previous authentication status. Even when a device is marked as compliant and the user has already passed MFA, the sign-in frequency control resets the session token, triggering a fresh MFA prompt each time the interval expires. On the MS-102 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of how session controls interact with device compliance; a common trap is assuming a compliant device alone prevents repeated prompts. Remember that sign-in frequency acts as a hard timer on the authentication session, independent of device health. A useful memory tip is “Frequency overrides compliance”—the configured time window always wins, so if users complain about constant MFA, check the sign-in frequency setting first.

MS-102 Practice Question: Implement and manage Microsoft Entra identity and access

This MS-102 practice question tests your understanding of implement and manage microsoft entra identity and access. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A multinational company uses Microsoft Entra ID with Conditional Access policies. They have a policy that requires multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all users when accessing the company's custom SaaS application. However, users from the European branch are reporting that they are prompted for MFA every time, even though they have already authenticated via a compliant device. What is the most likely cause?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "most likely"

    Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Read the full NAT/PAT explanation →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The Conditional Access policy has a session control that requires sign-in frequency

Option C is correct because the Conditional Access policy includes a session control that requires sign-in frequency, which forces users to re-authenticate with MFA at a specified interval regardless of device compliance or previous authentication. Even if the device is compliant and the user has already authenticated, the sign-in frequency control overrides session persistence and prompts for MFA again based on the configured time period (e.g., every hour). This explains why European branch users are repeatedly prompted for MFA despite having authenticated via a compliant device.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The user's device is not marked as compliant

    Why it's wrong here

    The question states the device is compliant.

  • The user has per-user MFA enabled

    Why it's wrong here

    Per-user MFA would prompt, but the issue is with Conditional Access policy.

  • The Conditional Access policy has a session control that requires sign-in frequency

    Why this is correct

    Sign-in frequency forces re-authentication after a set time, even on compliant devices.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • The policy includes a location condition that is not met

    Why it's wrong here

    Location condition would affect access, but the prompt is MFA, and location doesn't typically cause repeated MFA if already satisfied.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates confuse device compliance with session persistence, assuming that a compliant device automatically prevents repeated MFA prompts, but Conditional Access session controls like sign-in frequency explicitly override that behavior.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

The sign-in frequency session control in Conditional Access uses the 'Sign-in frequency' setting to enforce re-authentication at a defined interval (e.g., 1 hour, 24 hours) by issuing a new primary refresh token (PRT) with a reduced lifetime. This control works independently of device compliance and can be configured per policy, meaning even compliant devices must re-authenticate when the frequency period expires. In real-world scenarios, organizations often set a short sign-in frequency (e.g., 1 hour) for sensitive applications to meet security compliance requirements, which can cause user frustration if not communicated clearly.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related MS-102 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free MS-102 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this MS-102 question test?

Implement and manage Microsoft Entra identity and access — This question tests Implement and manage Microsoft Entra identity and access — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The Conditional Access policy has a session control that requires sign-in frequency — Option C is correct because the Conditional Access policy includes a session control that requires sign-in frequency, which forces users to re-authenticate with MFA at a specified interval regardless of device compliance or previous authentication. Even if the device is compliant and the user has already authenticated, the sign-in frequency control overrides session persistence and prompts for MFA again based on the configured time period (e.g., every hour). This explains why European branch users are repeatedly prompted for MFA despite having authenticated via a compliant device.

What should I do if I get this MS-102 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This MS-102 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MS-102 exam.