Quick Answer
The answer is the investigation package, because it is the Microsoft 365 Defender feature specifically designed to collect and present all evidence needed to identify compromised accounts after a credential phishing attack. When a user clicks a malicious link and enters credentials on a phishing page, the investigation package aggregates related emails, URL clicks, sign-in logs, and user actions into a single, downloadable ZIP file, allowing you to trace exactly which accounts were affected. On the MS-102 exam, this question tests your ability to distinguish between features that handle automated remediation (like automated investigation and response), device-level analysis, or file-level analysis versus the comprehensive evidence collection required for post-phishing account compromise. A common trap is confusing the investigation package with the device investigation feature, but remember: phishing targets user credentials, not devices. Memory tip: think of the investigation package as the “evidence locker” for user-level phishing incidents—it packages up everything you need to see who logged in after the phish.
This MS-102 practice question tests your understanding of manage security and threats by using microsoft defender xdr. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
You are investigating an incident in Microsoft 365 Defender. The incident involves a user who received a malicious link in an email and clicked it. The link led to a credential phishing page. You need to identify which user accounts might have been compromised. Which Microsoft 365 Defender feature should you use?
Live Response
Why wrong: Live Response is for device-level investigation, not account compromise.
Investigation package
The investigation package includes details on compromised accounts.
File investigation
Why wrong: File investigation focuses on malware files, not account compromise.
Action center
Why wrong: Action center shows pending/completed remediation actions, not account compromise evidence.
Answer choices
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Investigation package
Option C is correct because the investigation package contains evidence for compromised accounts. Option A is wrong because it's for automated actions. Option B is wrong because it's for device investigation. Option D is wrong because it's for file investigation.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
Live Response
Why it's wrong here
Live Response is for device-level investigation, not account compromise.
Investigation package
Why this is correct
The investigation package includes details on compromised accounts.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
File investigation
Why it's wrong here
File investigation focuses on malware files, not account compromise.
Action center
Why it's wrong here
Action center shows pending/completed remediation actions, not account compromise evidence.
Common exam traps
Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.
Trap categories for this question
Command / output trap
Action center shows pending/completed remediation actions, not account compromise evidence.
Detailed technical explanation
This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
A cloud solutions architect for a retail company is evaluating services for a new workload. The correct answer here reflects best practice for the specific scenario described — not a general cloud recommendation. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Cloud exam questions reward reading the constraint carefully: the same technology can be right or wrong depending on the use case.
What to study next
Identify which MS-102 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
Manage security and threats by using Microsoft Defender XDR — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
Manage security and threats by using Microsoft Defender XDR practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
All MS-102 questions
975 questions across all exam domains
Microsoft 365 Administrator MS-102 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
MS-102 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Practise MS-102 questions linked to Deploy and manage a Microsoft 365 tenant.
Practise MS-102 questions linked to Implement and manage Microsoft Entra identity and access.
Practise MS-102 questions linked to Manage security and threats by using Microsoft Defender XDR.
Practise MS-102 questions linked to Manage compliance by using Microsoft Purview.
Practise MS-102 questions linked to Manage users, groups, licensing, and support.
Practise MS-102 questions linked to Implement and manage identity and access in Microsoft Entra ID.
Practise MS-102 questions linked to MS-102 fundamentals.
Practise MS-102 questions linked to MS-102 scenario.
Practise MS-102 questions linked to MS-102 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Manage security and threats by using Microsoft Defender XDR — This question tests Manage security and threats by using Microsoft Defender XDR — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
The correct answer is: Investigation package — Option C is correct because the investigation package contains evidence for compromised accounts. Option A is wrong because it's for automated actions. Option B is wrong because it's for device investigation. Option D is wrong because it's for file investigation.
Identify which MS-102 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Keep practising
Last reviewed: Jun 21, 2026
This MS-102 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MS-102 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.