Configuring Chart of Accounts for Multiple Legal Entities with Different Fiscal Calendars
A company is implementing Dynamics 365 Finance and needs to configure a chart of accounts that supports multiple legal entities with different fiscal year requirements. What should the administrator do to ensure each legal entity can have its own fiscal calendar while sharing the main accounts?
Quick Answer
The correct answer is to configure shared main accounts and assign a separate fiscal calendar to each legal entity. This works because Dynamics 365 Finance separates the chart of accounts structure from the fiscal calendar, allowing main accounts to be defined once and shared across entities while each legal entity independently selects its own fiscal year setup. On the MB-920 exam, this tests your understanding of the shared and legal entity–specific layers in financial setup, often appearing as a trap where candidates assume different fiscal years require entirely separate charts of accounts. The key distinction is that the chart of accounts (main accounts) can be global, but the fiscal calendar is always assigned per legal entity. A helpful memory tip: think of main accounts as a shared dictionary, while each legal entity gets its own calendar year page.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Configure shared main accounts and assign a separate fiscal calendar to each legal entity.
Dynamics 365 Finance enables sharing main accounts across multiple legal entities while each legal entity can have its own fiscal calendar. This is accomplished by using a shared chart of accounts with shared main accounts, and then in the Ledger setup for each legal entity, assigning a separate fiscal calendar. Option A is incorrect because fiscal calendars are defined per legal entity, not per main account. Option C is incorrect because a single fiscal calendar cannot accommodate different fiscal year requirements across entities. Option D is incorrect because separate charts of accounts are unnecessary; main accounts can be shared while fiscal calendars differ.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Assign a fiscal calendar to each main account.
Why it's wrong here
Fiscal calendars are not assigned to main accounts; they are assigned to legal entities. Main accounts are shared and do not have individual fiscal calendars.
- ✓
Configure shared main accounts and assign a separate fiscal calendar to each legal entity.
Why this is correct
In Dynamics 365 Finance, main accounts can be shared across legal entities, and each legal entity can have its own fiscal calendar. This meets the requirement of supporting multiple legal entities with different fiscal years.
- ✗
Create a single fiscal calendar and share it across all legal entities.
Why it's wrong here
If legal entities have different fiscal year requirements, they cannot share a single fiscal calendar. Each legal entity needs its own fiscal calendar.
- ✗
Create a separate chart of accounts for each legal entity.
Why it's wrong here
Creating a separate chart of accounts for each legal entity is unnecessary and defeats the purpose of shared main accounts. The standard approach is to share main accounts and assign separate fiscal calendars per legal entity.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every MB-920 question from scratch — 930 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
2 more ways this is tested on MB-920
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. A company is implementing Dynamics 365 Finance and needs to configure a chart of accounts that supports multiple legal entities with different fiscal requirements. Which structure should be used?
easy- ✓ A.Use a shared chart of accounts with separate fiscal calendars per legal entity.
- B.Use a single shared chart of accounts with one shared fiscal calendar.
- C.Use main accounts only without dimensions.
- D.Create a separate chart of accounts for each legal entity.
Why A: A shared chart of accounts is the recommended approach in Dynamics 365 Finance when multiple legal entities must operate under different fiscal requirements. By sharing the chart of accounts but assigning separate fiscal calendars per legal entity, the organization maintains a consistent account structure across entities while allowing each entity to comply with its own fiscal year, period definitions, and closing schedules. This balances standardization with regulatory flexibility.
Variation 2. A company implements Dynamics 365 Finance and needs to configure a chart of accounts that supports multiple legal entities. What is the best practice for managing shared accounts?
easy- A.Delete accounts that are not used across all entities.
- ✓ B.Use the shared chart of accounts feature and assign it to each legal entity.
- C.Use financial dimensions to differentiate accounts by legal entity.
- D.Create a separate chart of accounts for each legal entity to ensure independence.
Why B: The shared chart of accounts feature in Dynamics 365 Finance allows a single chart of accounts to be used across multiple legal entities, ensuring consistency and simplifying maintenance. Option A is incorrect because deleting unused accounts is irrelevant to sharing. Option C is incorrect because financial dimensions are used for tracking, not for sharing the chart of accounts. Option D is incorrect because separate charts per entity increase complexity and are not a best practice.
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This MB-920 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MB-920 exam.