Question 557 of 750
Social Engineering AttacksmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

220-1202 Social Engineering Attacks Practice Question

This 220-1202 practice question tests your understanding of social engineering attacks. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

During a security audit, a technician notices that an unauthorized person is standing just behind an employee at the secure door, waiting for the employee to badge in so they can enter without badging themselves. What type of social engineering attack is being attempted?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Tailgating

Tailgating (also known as piggybacking) is a physical social engineering attack where an unauthorized person follows an authorized individual into a secured area without using their own credentials. In this scenario, the attacker waits for the employee to badge in and then slips through the door before it closes, bypassing the access control system. This exploits the trust or politeness of the employee and the physical security gap between the door closing and the authentication check.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Pretexting

    Why it's wrong here

    Pretexting involves a fabricated story, not physical proximity. The attacker here is using physical presence, not a story.

  • Baiting

    Why it's wrong here

    Baiting uses an enticing item to lure the victim. This scenario involves following someone through a door.

  • Tailgating

    Why this is correct

    Tailgating is when an unauthorized person gains access by closely following an authorized person through a secure entry point. This is exactly what is described.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Phishing

    Why it's wrong here

    Phishing is an electronic attack, not a physical one. This is a physical security breach.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

CompTIA often tests the distinction between tailgating and pretexting, where candidates mistakenly choose pretexting because they think the attacker is 'pretending' to be authorized, but the key difference is that tailgating requires no verbal deception—just physical proximity and timing.

Trap categories for this question

  • Scenario analysis trap

    Baiting uses an enticing item to lure the victim. This scenario involves following someone through a door.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

In access control systems, tailgating exploits the 'door prop' or 'door hold-open' time delay after a valid badge read; if the door's magnetic lock or strike remains released for a set period (often 5–10 seconds), an attacker can enter without triggering an alarm unless a secondary sensor (e.g., a tailgate detection camera or pressure mat) is deployed. Real-world scenarios include attackers using a 'piggyback' technique at turnstiles or mantraps, where the system assumes one badge read equals one person, but multiple individuals pass through. Some advanced systems use 'count' logic or optical sensors to detect multiple entries per credential, but many legacy systems lack this protection.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the 220-1202 exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related 220-1202 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 220-1202 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 220-1202 question test?

Social Engineering Attacks — This question tests Social Engineering Attacks — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Tailgating — Tailgating (also known as piggybacking) is a physical social engineering attack where an unauthorized person follows an authorized individual into a secured area without using their own credentials. In this scenario, the attacker waits for the employee to badge in and then slips through the door before it closes, bypassing the access control system. This exploits the trust or politeness of the employee and the physical security gap between the door closing and the authentication check.

What should I do if I get this 220-1202 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More 220-1202 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 220-1202 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 220-1202 exam.