A FortiManager administrator wants to push policy package changes to a managed FortiGate, but wants to see what changes will be applied before committing. Which FortiManager feature should the administrator use?
Why this answer
Install preview is the correct feature because it allows the administrator to simulate the installation of policy package changes on a managed FortiGate without actually applying them. This provides a detailed diff of what will be added, modified, or removed, enabling verification before committing the changes. It is specifically designed for pre-commit validation in FortiManager's centralized management workflow.
Exam trap
The trap here is that candidates confuse revision history (which shows past changes) with install preview (which shows future changes), leading them to select revision history as a way to see pending changes.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option B is wrong because meta fields are used to store custom metadata (e.g., location, contact) for objects like policies or devices, not to preview pending changes. Option C is wrong because automation stitches trigger automated responses based on events (e.g., interface down), not for previewing policy package installations. Option D is wrong because revision history allows viewing and comparing past configuration backups, but it does not show what changes will be applied in the next commit; it is retrospective, not prospective.