A user reports their system is running slowly, and you observe a suspicious file in 'C:\Users\[User]\AppData\Local\Temp'. What is the most appropriate first step in your investigation?
Calculating the hash preserves volatile evidence before the suspicious file in the Temp folder is altered or deleted, satisfying the need to establish integrity for later comparison against threat intelligence. Hashing is non-destructive, so it captures a unique fingerprint without modifying the artefact, unlike opening or executing it.
Why this answer
Calculating the file hash is the correct first step because it preserves the integrity of the evidence and allows the file to be identified against known malware databases (e.g., VirusTotal, NIST NSRL) without altering or executing it. Hashing is non-destructive, produces a unique fingerprint (MD5/SHA-256), and maintains chain-of-custody for any subsequent forensic or legal action. This aligns with the order of volatility and standard incident response handling procedures.
Exam trap
212-89 often tests whether candidates understand that evidence preservation (hashing) precedes any destructive or analytical action, and many candidates incorrectly choose 'delete immediately' as a containment step.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because re-imaging destroys volatile evidence and any forensic artifacts before analysis, which is a drastic remediation step, not a first investigative action. Option B is wrong because deleting the file immediately destroys potential evidence and prevents attribution or scope determination. Option C is wrong because executing the file in a debugger, even in a controlled environment, risks infecting the host and is not a safe first step on a production system without proper sandboxing.