Courseiva

Certified Incident Handler (212-89) (212-89) — Questions 151–225

321 questions total · 5 pages · All types, answers revealed

Page 2

Page 3 of 5

Page 4
151
MCQeasy

A junior SOC analyst receives an alert at 03:00 showing a workstation contacting a known command-and-control (C2) IP address. The analyst is unsure whether this is a true incident or a false positive and wants guidance before waking the on-call incident handler. According to the incident handling process, what should the analyst do FIRST?

A.Immediately isolate the workstation from the network to prevent potential lateral movement.
B.Perform triage by validating the alert against available telemetry to determine whether it is a true or false positive.
C.Escalate the alert to the on-call incident handler immediately without performing any validation.
D.Close the alert as a false positive because the IP address may be shared infrastructure.
AnswerB

Triage is the first activity in the incident handling process after detection: the analyst correlates the alert with other telemetry (proxy logs, EDR process trees, DNS logs) to confirm whether the C2 contact is real. Only after validation should the analyst classify severity and escalate. This avoids unnecessary wake-ups while still ensuring genuine incidents are escalated quickly.

Why this answer

Triage is the validation step that separates genuine incidents from false positives before escalation. The analyst should correlate the C2 alert with other telemetry to confirm malicious activity, then classify and escalate if warranted. This preserves incident handler time and ensures real incidents are handled promptly.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that any alert involving a known-bad IP must be escalated instantly, skipping the triage validation step that the incident handling process requires.

152
MCQhard

You are dealing with a legal hold request for data related to an investigation. How should you handle the data retention policy for this specific case?

A.Export the data to a public cloud storage service
B.Follow the standard 90-day retention policy
C.Suspend the automatic deletion for the affected data
D.Delete the data and generate an audit log
AnswerC

A legal hold overrides routine lifecycle rules, so automatic deletion must be suspended for the affected data. This preserves potentially relevant evidence until the investigation concludes, satisfying the retention obligation without altering the wider policy.

Why this answer

A legal hold overrides existing retention policies, preventing the automatic deletion of relevant data.

153
MCQmedium

During an investigation of a compromised e-commerce web application, you observe that the attacker sent a single HTTP request containing a serialized object in the 'cart' cookie. The application deserialized the data and subsequently spawned a shell process on the server. Which web application vulnerability was exploited?

A.Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
B.Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
C.XML External Entity (XXE) Injection
D.Insecure Deserialization
AnswerD

Insecure deserialization occurs when untrusted data is used to abuse the logic of an application, inflict a denial-of-service attack, or execute arbitrary code. Here, the serialized object in a cookie was deserialized, leading to remote code execution (spawning a shell), which is a classic indicator of this vulnerability.

Why this answer

The attacker exploited insecure deserialization by sending a malicious serialized object in a cookie. When the application deserialized it, the payload executed arbitrary code, spawning a shell. This is a direct indicator of insecure deserialization, often leading to remote code execution.

Other vulnerabilities like XXE, XSS, or SSRF do not match the observed behavior of deserialization leading to shell execution.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that any cookie-based attack is session hijacking or XSS, overlooking that serialized objects in cookies can lead to server-side code execution via insecure deserialization.

154
MCQmedium

A user reports an email that appears to come from the CFO but the message was sent from an external IP address. The message passed SPF but failed DMARC alignment. What should the incident handler do first?

A.Delete the email from the user's mailbox and take no further action.
B.Quarantine the email and verify the sender's identity through a separate communication channel.
C.Forward the email to all employees as a warning about phishing attempts.
D.Reply to the email asking for confirmation of the request.
AnswerB

The email passed SPF but failed DMARC alignment, indicating a spoofed sender. Quarantining prevents further spread, and verifying via a separate channel (e.g., phone call) confirms the legitimacy of the request. This aligns with incident handling best practices for suspected business email compromise.

Why this answer

The email passed SPF but failed DMARC alignment, meaning the sending IP is authorized for a domain but not the visible From domain. This indicates spoofing. Quarantining the message and verifying the request through a separate channel are critical first steps to prevent fraud and contain the incident.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that a passed SPF check guarantees the sender is legitimate, ignoring DMARC alignment failures that reveal spoofing.

155
MCQmedium

Which technique should an incident responder use to prevent an infected host from spreading ransomware via SMB to other segments in the network?

A.Disable DNS resolution on the host
B.Enable DHCP snooping
C.Flush the ARP cache
D.Implement ACLs to block TCP 445 between segments
AnswerD

SMB ransomware propagation uses TCP 445, so ACLs blocking that port between segments halt lateral spread while leaving other traffic intact. This directly satisfies the containment constraint by severing the specific channel the infected host exploits.

Why this answer

Blocking TCP 445 (SMB) at the boundary between network segments is the most effective way to stop worm-like lateral movement.

156
MCQhard

During an email incident investigation, you need to determine whether a message was altered in transit. You have the full email headers. Which header field should you examine to verify the cryptographic signature that validates the message content and ensures it was not modified after sending?

A.Return-Path
B.Received
C.Message-ID
D.DKIM-Signature
AnswerD

This is correct because the DKIM-Signature header contains the cryptographic signature that covers specified headers and the body. Verifying this signature confirms the message was not altered in transit and was sent by an authorized server for the domain. In an incident investigation, a valid DKIM signature helps rule out content tampering, while a failed or missing signature raises suspicion.

Why this answer

The DKIM-Signature header holds the cryptographic signature that validates the message content and certain headers. By verifying this signature, an investigator can determine whether the message was altered in transit and whether it was authorized by the sending domain. The other headers provide routing or identification information but lack cryptographic integrity protection.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing routing headers like Received with cryptographic headers, when only DKIM-Signature provides a verifiable cryptographic signature for message integrity.

157
Multi-Selecthard

You are investigating a cross-site scripting incident on a customer-facing web application. The attacker injected a persistent payload that executes in the browsers of users viewing a product review page. Which TWO actions should you take to contain the incident and protect users while preserving evidence? (Choose two.)

Select 2 answers
A.Immediately delete the malicious review from the database to stop the payload from executing.
B.Capture the malicious review content and associated database records before removing or sanitizing them.
C.Apply output encoding to the review display page and review other user-generated content fields for similar issues.
D.Block all inbound HTTP requests containing angle brackets at the perimeter firewall.
E.Disable the entire web application until the development team rewrites the review module.
AnswersB, C

Preserving the stored payload and its database context is essential for understanding the injection point, identifying the affected records, and supporting later analysis or legal action. Removing the content first would destroy evidence of how the attacker bypassed input validation and what other data may have been tampered with.

Why this answer

Containment of a stored XSS incident requires preserving the malicious content as evidence while preventing it from executing in users' browsers. Capturing the database records and applying output encoding on the affected page achieves both goals and allows the team to check other user-generated content fields for similar flaws. Deleting the content, shutting down the application, or applying crude perimeter filters either destroys evidence or provides ineffective protection.

Exam trap

The trap here is treating deletion of the malicious content as containment, when it actually destroys the evidence needed to find the injection point and identify other affected records.

158
MCQmedium

You are analyzing an email with a suspicious attachment. You notice the file name is 'invoice.pdf.exe'. What does this indicate?

A.The file is a double-extension obfuscation attempt
B.The file is a legitimate script file
C.The file is encrypted with a password
D.The file is a genuine PDF that requires an executable
AnswerA

The double extension exploits Windows' default behaviour of hiding known file extensions, so 'invoice.pdf.exe' displays as 'invoice.pdf' in Explorer. The executable extension remains .exe, meaning the attachment runs code rather than opening as a document — satisfying the stem's suspicious-attachment indicator.

Why this answer

A filename like 'invoice.pdf.exe' uses a double extension to disguise an executable as a PDF. Windows hides known file extensions by default, so the file may appear as 'invoice.pdf' to the user, but it actually runs as an .exe. This is a classic social-engineering technique to trick users into executing malware.

Exam trap

The trap is assuming the file is a PDF because the visible name ends in .pdf; candidates must recognize that the true extension is .exe and that Windows hides it by default.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because a legitimate script file would not typically use a .pdf.exe double extension; script files use extensions like .ps1, .vbs, or .js, and the double extension is a hallmark of obfuscation. Option C is wrong because password-encrypted files usually have extensions like .zip, .rar, or .pdf with encryption inside, not a double executable extension. Option D is wrong because a genuine PDF does not require an executable wrapper; PDFs are opened by a PDF reader, and an .exe extension indicates an executable, not a PDF.

159
MCQeasy

After an incident has been resolved, the incident handler is conducting a post-incident review. Which activity is the PRIMARY purpose of this phase?

A.Assigning blame to the employees responsible for the incident.
B.Restoring affected systems to normal operations.
C.Identifying lessons learned to improve future incident response.
D.Closing the incident ticket in the tracking system.
AnswerC

The post-incident review, often called lessons learned, aims to evaluate the response, identify what worked and what did not, and update policies, procedures, and training. This continuous improvement is the primary purpose of the phase, ensuring the organization is better prepared for future incidents.

Why this answer

The post-incident review, or lessons learned phase, is dedicated to analyzing the incident and the response to identify improvements. Its primary purpose is to enhance future incident handling by updating plans, procedures, and training. Blame, recovery, and ticket closure are either inappropriate or belong to other phases, making lessons learned the correct focus.

Exam trap

The trap here is equating the post-incident review with administrative closure or recovery, when its true purpose is continuous improvement through analysis.

160
Multi-Selecteasy

Which TWO of the following are common signs of a compromised switch in a local area network?

Select 2 answers
A.Unrecognized trunk ports enabled
B.Normal spanning-tree convergence
C.Decreased CPU usage on the switch
D.Unexpected MAC address table growth (MAC flooding)
E.Stable port security status
AnswersA, D

Trunk ports carry traffic for multiple VLANs, so an unrecognised trunk enabled on an access switch lets an attacker reach other VLANs, bypassing segmentation. This unauthorised configuration change is a strong indicator that the switch has been compromised.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because an unrecognized or unauthorized trunk port enabled on a switch is a classic indicator of compromise—attackers configure trunk links (e.g., 802.1Q) to carry traffic for multiple VLANs and perform VLAN hopping or intercept traffic that should remain segmented. Option D is correct because unexpected MAC address table growth indicates MAC flooding, where an attacker overwhelms the switch's CAM table with spoofed source MACs, forcing it into fail-open hub behavior so traffic is flooded to all ports for sniffing. The unmarked options do not belong: normal spanning-tree convergence (B) is expected healthy behavior, decreased CPU usage (C) is not a compromise sign (attacks typically raise CPU load), and a stable port security status (E) reflects normal, secure operation rather than an indicator of compromise.

161
Multi-Selecthard

Which THREE of the following are critical requirements for maintaining a valid Chain of Custody?

Select 3 answers
A.A log of all software installed on the investigator's machine
B.Verifying that the evidence was not tampered with during transport
C.A copy of the attacker's original IP address
D.A chronological record of who had possession of the evidence
E.Detailed documentation of where the evidence was stored
AnswersB, D, E

Chain of custody requires documented verification that evidence remained unaltered between collection, transport and storage. Tamper checks, such as sealed containers and hash validation, prove integrity, ensuring the evidence stays admissible in legal or disciplinary proceedings.

Why this answer

Option B is correct because a valid Chain of Custody must demonstrate that evidence remained unaltered from seizure through presentation, which requires verifying integrity during transport (e.g., via hash comparison or sealed tamper-evident containers). Option D is correct because the core of Chain of Custody is a chronological record documenting every individual who took possession of the evidence, including times, dates, and signatures, ensuring unbroken accountability. Option E is correct because documenting exactly where evidence was stored (location, container, conditions) is essential to prove it was secured against unauthorized access or contamination.

Option A does not belong because a log of software installed on the investigator's machine relates to tool validation and forensic soundness, not to the custody of the evidence itself. Option C does not belong because the attacker's original IP address is an investigative artifact or indicator of compromise, not a requirement for maintaining Chain of Custody.

Exam trap

212-89 often tests whether candidates can distinguish chain-of-custody requirements from general investigative data — the trap is selecting an attacker artifact (like an IP address) because it sounds relevant to the incident, when the question is specifically about custody documentation.

162
MCQeasy

During an incident, you need to isolate a compromised workstation from the network immediately. Which action is the most effective containment strategy while preserving volatile memory?

A.Shut down the computer immediately
B.Disconnect the network cable
C.Delete the suspicious files
D.Run a full antivirus scan
AnswerB

Physically unplugging the cable severs all network communication instantly, satisfying immediate isolation, while the workstation stays powered so volatile memory and running processes remain intact for later forensic capture. Wireless or software-based blocking risks missing alternate paths or triggering shutdown.

Why this answer

Disconnecting the network cable is the correct containment action because it immediately severs the workstation's communication with the network (stopping lateral movement, C2 beaconing, and data exfiltration) while leaving the system powered on. This preserves volatile evidence such as RAM contents, running processes, network connections, and encryption keys that would be lost on shutdown. It is the least destructive way to isolate a host during the containment phase of incident response.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing containment with eradication — candidates pick shutdown or AV scanning because those feel like 'taking action,' but the question explicitly requires preserving volatile memory, which only the cable-pull option satisfies.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because shutting down the computer destroys volatile memory (RAM), running process state, active network connections, and potentially encryption keys — violating the order of volatility and forensics best practice. Option C is wrong because deleting suspicious files is a destructive action that alters evidence, may trigger malware self-defense mechanisms, and does nothing to stop ongoing network communication. Option D is wrong because running a full antivirus scan is a remediation/eradication step, not containment — it takes time during which the attacker retains network access, and it modifies the system state.

163
Multi-Selectmedium

A web application is experiencing a suspected cross-site scripting (XSS) incident. You are reviewing web server and application logs to identify the attack. Which TWO log sources are MOST likely to contain evidence of the XSS payload being submitted and executed? (Choose two.)

Select 2 answers
A.Application logs that record user input validation failures or sanitization events.
B.Web server access logs showing the malicious script in the request URI or POST body.
C.Firewall logs showing outbound connections to the attacker's command-and-control server.
D.Database logs showing SQL queries executed with the XSS payload.
E.Operating system audit logs showing process creation events for the web server user.
AnswersA, B

Application logs often record when input fails validation or when suspicious characters are detected. If the application has input sanitization or a web application firewall (WAF) in logging mode, it may log the XSS attempt. These logs provide context about whether the payload was blocked or allowed, and can help identify the specific parameter targeted.

Why this answer

XSS payloads are submitted as part of HTTP requests and may be recorded in web server access logs if the request method or logging configuration captures them. Application logs can also record input validation failures or sanitization events related to the payload. Together, these sources help identify the injection point and whether the attack was blocked.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing XSS with SQL injection or other server-side attacks, leading to examination of database or OS logs instead of client-side request logs.

164
Multi-Selecthard

Which TWO pieces of information must be collected to successfully track a session hijacking attack across multiple log sources?

Select 2 answers
A.The BIOS version of the server
B.The session ID/cookie value
C.The web server's MAC address
D.The server's physical location
E.The exact timestamp of the requests
AnswersB, E

The session ID or cookie value is the unique token identifying a user's authenticated session. Correlating this value across web server, proxy and application logs lets analysts follow the attacker's requests after the token is stolen, satisfying the requirement to track the hijacked session across multiple sources.

Why this answer

To track a session hijacking attack across multiple log sources, you must be able to correlate the attacker's activity with the victim's session, which requires the session ID/cookie value (option B) because that token uniquely identifies the HTTP session and appears in web server, proxy, and application logs. You also need the exact timestamp of the requests (option E) so that events recorded in different logs (e.g., web server access logs, firewall logs, IDS/IPS alerts) can be aligned chronologically to reconstruct the attack sequence. The BIOS version of the server (option A) is irrelevant to session tracking because it does not identify user sessions or request timing.

The web server's MAC address (option C) is a layer-2 hardware identifier that does not appear in application-layer session logs and cannot correlate a hijacked session. The server's physical location (option D) is also irrelevant, as session hijacking is tracked through logical identifiers and timestamps, not geographic placement of hardware.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing session tracking with server identification; candidates might think hardware details like MAC address or BIOS version are useful, but they are not logged per session and cannot correlate user activity across multiple logs.

165
Multi-Selectmedium

Which THREE of the following are key components of a network-based containment strategy?

Select 3 answers
A.Isolation of the compromised segment from the rest of the network
B.Forced termination of active sessions
C.Implementation of egress filtering at the perimeter
D.Increasing the DHCP lease time
E.Installing new hardware across the network
AnswersA, B, C

Isolation severs the compromised segment's Layer 2 and Layer 3 connectivity, preventing lateral movement to healthy subnets while the incident is investigated. This directly satisfies the containment requirement by limiting blast radius, and is a recognised key component alongside traffic filtering and endpoint quarantine in network-based containment strategies.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because isolating the compromised network segment (for example, by moving it to a quarantine VLAN or applying ACLs on the switch/router) prevents lateral movement of the attacker to other hosts while containment is underway. Option B is correct because forcibly terminating active sessions (resetting TCP connections, killing authenticated sessions, or invalidating tokens) cuts off the attacker's existing foothold and command-and-control channels. Option C is correct because egress filtering at the perimeter blocks outbound traffic to known malicious IPs/domains, stopping data exfiltration and C2 callbacks, which is a core part of containing a network-based incident.

Option D is not a containment measure; extending DHCP lease times only affects address assignment duration and does nothing to stop an active intrusion. Option E is not a containment action either, since wholesale hardware replacement is a costly remediation/recovery step, not a strategy for limiting the spread of an ongoing network-based attack.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing containment with remediation or unrelated network management tasks; candidates might select options that seem helpful but do not directly limit the spread or impact of an active incident.

166
MCQmedium

A first responder is collecting evidence from a compromised Windows server. The server is still running, and the responder needs to preserve the current state of network connections and the associated processes. Which command should the responder use to capture this information?

A.ipconfig /all
B.systeminfo
C.tasklist /v
D.netstat -ano
AnswerD

The netstat -ano command displays all active TCP and UDP connections, listening ports, and the owning process ID (PID) for each connection. This is exactly what the responder needs to correlate network activity with running processes. The -a shows all connections, -n displays addresses numerically, and -o gives the PID. This output is volatile and should be saved to external media for later analysis. It is a standard first response command on Windows systems.

Why this answer

To capture current network connections and the associated processes on a Windows server, the responder should use netstat -ano. This command shows all connections, listening ports, and the owning process ID, allowing correlation between network activity and running processes. The other commands provide configuration, process list, or system information but do not capture the required network state.

Therefore, netstat -ano is the correct choice for preserving this volatile evidence.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing network configuration commands like ipconfig with network state commands like netstat, which show active connections and owning processes.

167
MCQhard

You are investigating a suspected fileless malware incident on a Windows server. EDR telemetry shows that powershell.exe was spawned by winword.exe and executed an encoded command that downloaded a script from a remote host. The process has already exited. Which artifact is MOST likely to contain the decoded command and the URL contacted?

A.The Sysmon event ID 1 log, which records process creation with hashes and parent process information.
B.The Windows Security event log, event ID 4688, which records process creation with full command lines.
C.The PowerShell operational log, event ID 4104, which records script block content including the decoded command.
D.The Windows Prefetch file for powershell.exe, which stores the last executed command line and remote URLs.
AnswerC

When script block logging is enabled, PowerShell writes event ID 4104 to the Microsoft-Windows-PowerShell/Operational log, capturing the actual script text after decoding. This reveals the deobfuscated command and any embedded URL, even though the process has exited, making it the most reliable artifact for reconstructing the fileless execution chain.

Why this answer

For fileless attacks using encoded PowerShell, the decoded script content is captured by PowerShell script block logging in event ID 4104 when that feature is enabled. Unlike process creation logs that preserve the obfuscated Base64 string, this event records the actual script text executed, exposing embedded URLs and commands even after the process has terminated.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that process creation logs alone reveal the full attack, when encoded PowerShell hides the real command until script block logging decodes it.

168
Multi-Selecteasy

Which TWO of the following are common indicators that an incident should be declared?

Select 2 answers
A.A scheduled software update being pushed to clients
B.Unusual or unauthorized system access patterns
C.An increase in system CPU usage during scheduled maintenance
D.Unexplained loss of service or system availability
E.An employee requesting a password reset
AnswersB, D

Unusual or unauthorised access patterns indicate possible compromise, such as credential misuse or lateral movement, which warrants declaring an incident so containment and investigation can begin. This satisfies the criterion of a security-relevant anomaly deviating from normal baseline behaviour.

Why this answer

Option B is correct because unusual or unauthorized system access patterns — such as logins from anomalous geolocations, off-hours authentication, or brute-force attempts — are classic indicators of a security incident requiring declaration and investigation. Option D is correct because an unexplained loss of service or system availability (e.g., unexpected downtime, DoS symptoms, or a crashed critical service) signals a potential incident that must be declared so response procedures can begin. Option A is not an indicator, since a scheduled software update is a planned, authorized change rather than an anomaly.

Option C is not an indicator because elevated CPU usage during scheduled maintenance is expected and accounted for. Option E is not an indicator, as a routine password reset request is a normal helpdesk activity, not evidence of a security event.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing routine IT events (scheduled updates, maintenance CPU spikes, password resets) with genuine incident indicators, leading candidates to select benign activities as incidents.

169
MCQeasy

A network administrator notices a sudden spike in ICMP echo requests from an internal host to an external IP address. The payload size of these ICMP packets is consistently larger than normal ping requests. Which of the following is the MOST likely cause of this activity?

A.The host is experiencing a denial-of-service attack from the external IP.
B.The host is using a legitimate application that relies on ICMP for keep-alive messages.
C.The host is infected with malware using ICMP tunneling for data exfiltration.
D.The host is performing a network performance test using ping.
AnswerC

ICMP tunneling involves encapsulating data within ICMP echo requests and replies, often using oversized payloads to carry stolen data. A sudden spike in ICMP traffic with consistently large payloads to an external IP is a strong indicator of this technique. Attackers use ICMP tunneling to bypass firewalls that allow ping, making it a stealthy exfiltration method.

Why this answer

The correct answer is malware using ICMP tunneling. The scenario describes a sudden spike in ICMP echo requests with consistently large payloads to an external IP, which is a classic sign of ICMP tunneling. Attackers use this technique to exfiltrate data by embedding it in ICMP packets, often bypassing firewall restrictions that allow ping.

This allows stealthy data transfer out of the network.

Exam trap

The trap here is dismissing large ICMP packets as normal ping traffic, when in fact attackers can abuse ICMP for covert data transfer.

170
MCQeasy

A helpdesk technician reports that a user's browser is redirecting searches to an unfamiliar site and displaying pop-up advertisements even when no browser is open. You suspect a potentially unwanted program or adware infection. Which initial step is most appropriate for an incident handler?

A.Ask the user to clear browser cache and reset browser settings to default
B.Immediately reimage the workstation to guarantee complete removal
C.Run a full antivirus scan and delete everything it flags as malicious
D.Capture volatile data such as running processes, network connections, and browser extensions before making changes
AnswerD

Capturing volatile data first preserves process lists, network connections, loaded modules, and browser extension details that disappear on reboot or cleanup. This evidence lets the handler identify the adware family, its persistence mechanism, and any command-and-control endpoints, which informs scoping and ensures eradication is complete rather than superficial.

Why this answer

Capturing volatile data before any remediation preserves running processes, network connections, and browser extension details that would otherwise be lost. This evidence is essential for identifying the adware family, its persistence, and any broader compromise, enabling accurate scoping and complete eradication rather than a superficial cleanup.

Exam trap

The trap here is jumping to remediation such as reimaging or scanning before collecting volatile evidence, which destroys the artifacts needed to understand and fully remove the infection.

171
MCQmedium

During a malware incident response, you identify a suspicious process with PID 4452 using Sysinternals Process Explorer. You need to verify the file's reputation before isolation. Which action allows you to do this directly within the tool?

A.Use the 'Find Handle or DLL' search bar for the file name
B.Select the process and click Options > Check VirusTotal
C.Right-click the process and select 'Verify Signature'
D.Navigate to View > Lower Pane View > Handles
AnswerB

Process Explorer integrates a VirusTotal lookup: selecting the process and choosing Options > Check VirusTotal submits the executable's hash to the service and returns its reputation, letting you assess the file before isolating the host.

Why this answer

Sysinternals Process Explorer integrates directly with VirusTotal via Options > Check VirusTotal, which submits the selected process's file hash to VirusTotal and displays the multi-engine detection ratio in a new column. This lets an analyst assess file reputation without leaving the tool or manually uploading the binary. It is the fastest way to triage a suspicious PID during live malware response.

Exam trap

212-89 often tests tool-specific feature knowledge — the trap is confusing Process Explorer's handle/DLL search or signature verification with reputation checking, when only the VirusTotal option actually queries external threat intelligence.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because 'Find Handle or DLL' searches for which processes hold a given handle or DLL — it is a dependency/handle investigation feature, not a reputation lookup. Option C is wrong because 'Verify Signature' only checks whether the binary is digitally signed by a trusted publisher; malware can be unsigned or abusively signed, so signature verification does not provide reputation data. Option D is wrong because the Lower Pane Handles view shows open handles (files, registry keys, mutexes) for the selected process — useful for behavioral analysis but not for querying file reputation.

172
Multi-Selectmedium

Which TWO of the following are common sources for incident identification?

Select 2 answers
A.Randomly checking employee browser history
B.Cleaning the office breakroom
C.Alerts from IDS or SIEM systems
D.The daily lunch menu
E.Reports from internal users or employees
AnswersC, E

IDS and SIEM systems continuously correlate network and host telemetry against known attack signatures and behavioural baselines, generating alerts when activity deviates. This directly satisfies the stem's requirement for a common incident identification source, since these platforms are purpose-built to surface potential security events for analyst triage.

Why this answer

Option C is correct because IDS (Intrusion Detection System) and SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) systems are designed to continuously monitor network traffic, logs, and events, generating alerts that are primary technical sources for identifying security incidents. Option E is correct because internal users or employees often report suspicious activity, phishing emails, or anomalies they encounter, making user reports a valuable and common human source of incident identification. The remaining options do not belong: randomly checking employee browser history (A) is not a systematic or standard detection method and raises privacy concerns, cleaning the breakroom (B) and the daily lunch menu (D) are unrelated to security monitoring or incident detection.

Exam trap

212-89 often tests whether candidates can distinguish legitimate detection sources from obviously irrelevant activities — the trap is overthinking and selecting a plausible-sounding but non-systematic source like browser history checks instead of the standard IDS/SIEM and user-report channels.

173
MCQhard

You are performing forensic analysis on a suspicious file. You need to determine if it is a packed executable. Which tool is most effective for viewing the file's section headers to identify anomalies?

A.PEview
B.Wireshark
C.Process Explorer
D.Regedit
AnswerA

PEview parses the Portable Executable structure and displays section headers, letting the analyst spot anomalies such as non-standard section names, high entropy, or unusual raw sizes that indicate packing. It directly addresses the need to inspect section headers.

Why this answer

PEview is a Windows tool that parses the Portable Executable (PE) format and displays section headers, the import table, export table, and other structural metadata. Packed executables typically show anomalies such as section names like UPX0/UPX1, unusually high entropy, a tiny import table, or a section with raw size much larger than virtual size — all visible in PEview's section header view.

Exam trap

The trap is picking a runtime or network tool (Process Explorer, Wireshark) for a static file-structure question — the exam tests whether you know which tool operates at which layer of analysis.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because Wireshark is a network protocol analyzer; it captures and dissects packets and has no ability to parse PE file structure. Option C is wrong because Process Explorer monitors running processes, handles, and DLLs at runtime; it does not statically analyze a file's section headers. Option D is wrong because Regedit is the Windows Registry editor and has nothing to do with PE file analysis.

174
MCQmedium

A security analyst is investigating lateral movement using PowerShell Remoting (WinRM). Which Windows Event Log should be prioritized to confirm the execution of remote commands?

A.Application Log
B.Security Log
C.System Log
D.Microsoft-Windows-PowerShell/Operational
AnswerD

PowerShell Remoting executes commands through the PowerShell engine, which writes script block and command invocation events to the Microsoft-Windows-PowerShell/Operational log. Event ID 4104 records the actual script content executed remotely, confirming command execution that WinRM transport logs alone cannot show.

Why this answer

The Microsoft-Windows-PowerShell/Operational log records detailed PowerShell activity, including remote command execution via WinRM (PowerShell Remoting). When an analyst runs Invoke-Command or Enter-PSSession against a remote host, the remote endpoint writes events such as Event ID 4103 (module logging) and 4104 (script block logging) to this log, providing the actual command content executed. The Security log records authentication (4624/4625) but not the payload of remote commands, making the PowerShell Operational log the priority source for confirming execution.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing authentication evidence (Security Log 4624/4648) with execution evidence, causing candidates to pick the Security Log when the question asks specifically about confirming remote command execution.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because the Application Log only captures events written by applications using the Windows Event Log API and does not record PowerShell script block or module activity. Option B is wrong because the Security Log captures logon events, process creation (4688), and object access, but not the actual PowerShell command text or script blocks executed remotely. Option C is wrong because the System Log records kernel, driver, and service events, not user-level PowerShell execution telemetry.

175
MCQhard

You are managing chain of custody for a physical server seized during an investigation. What is the most critical action to ensure the evidence remains admissible in court?

A.Taking photographs of the server location
B.Logging every individual who accessed, transported, or stored the device
C.Using an anti-static bag for transport
D.Hashing the drive contents immediately
AnswerB

An unbroken, documented access log proves the evidence was continuously controlled and untampered from seizure onward. This documented chain satisfies the admissibility requirement by letting the court verify integrity, defeating challenges that the device was altered or substituted.

Why this answer

Maintaining a verifiable, gapless log of every person who touched the evidence is the core requirement of chain of custody.

176
MCQeasy

Which of the following is an example of a non-volatile data source?

A.Processor Cache.
B.Network state table.
C.Hard Disk Drive.
D.System RAM.
AnswerC

A hard disk drive retains its stored data when power is removed, unlike RAM or cache, which lose contents on shutdown. This persistence satisfies the question's requirement for a non-volatile source, making it the appropriate example of storage that survives power loss.

Why this answer

A hard disk drive (HDD) is a non-volatile storage device — it retains data even when power is removed, because data is stored magnetically on platters. This makes it a classic example of a non-volatile data source in digital forensics, where investigators seek persistent artifacts like files, logs, and registry hives.

Exam trap

The trap is confusing volatile memory (RAM, cache, network tables) with non-volatile storage. Candidates who don't internalize the power-off test may pick 'System RAM' because it stores data, forgetting that it loses it without power.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because processor cache is volatile SRAM inside the CPU; its contents are lost when power is removed and it is not a persistent forensic source. Option B is wrong because a network state table (e.g., ARP cache, routing table, connection tracking table) is maintained in volatile memory and disappears on reboot or power loss. Option D is wrong because system RAM is volatile DRAM — it holds running processes and temporary data only while powered, and is lost on shutdown (though it can be captured via memory forensics before power-off).

177
MCQhard

You suspect an incident involves an insider threat. Which step should be taken FIRST to preserve the integrity of the potential evidence while minimizing system downtime?

A.Change the root password to lock out the attacker
B.Delete the suspicious user account
C.Reboot the compromised system to clear malicious memory
D.Capture a bit-stream image of the storage media
AnswerD

A bit-stream image captures an exact, write-blocked replica of the storage media, preserving the original evidence intact for forensic examination and admissibility. Analysing the copy rather than the source minimises downtime on the suspect's live system while maintaining evidential integrity.

Why this answer

Creating a forensic image ensures that the current state is preserved before any volatile data is lost or system state changes.

178
MCQmedium

A user reports an email from a known vendor that asks them to confirm banking details by replying with a completed form attached as an HTML file. The message passed SPF, DKIM, and DMARC because it came from the vendor's legitimate mail server. As the incident handler, what is the most accurate conclusion about this email?

A.It is a legitimate message because all three authentication checks passed
B.It is a spoofed message and the authentication results must be incorrect
C.It may be a business email compromise sent from the vendor's compromised mailbox despite valid authentication
D.It should be quarantined automatically because HTML attachments are always malicious
AnswerC

When a legitimate account is compromised, the attacker sends from the real mailbox and infrastructure, so SPF, DKIM, and DMARC all pass. The fraudulent banking request and the HTML attachment are content-level indicators, so the handler should treat it as a business email compromise and verify with the vendor through a separate channel.

Why this answer

Authentication results confirm the sending domain, not the sender's intent. A compromised vendor mailbox produces messages that pass SPF, DKIM, and DMARC while carrying a fraudulent request, which matches the business email compromise pattern. The handler should verify the banking change through a known-good channel before acting on the attachment.

Exam trap

The trap here is treating a DMARC pass as proof that the message content is trustworthy.

179
MCQmedium

You are using a SIEM to correlate events during an investigation. What is the primary advantage of correlation in incident analysis?

A.It reduces the amount of storage required for logs
B.It links related alerts to show the attack progression
C.It automatically blocks all suspicious traffic
D.It replaces the need for human analysis
AnswerB

Correlation joins discrete alerts sharing entities, timelines or indicators into a single narrative, exposing the sequence of attacker actions across otherwise isolated sources. That linkage directly satisfies the stem's investigative goal: revealing attack progression rather than reviewing unrelated events individually, so analysts can reconstruct the intrusion chain.

Why this answer

Correlation in a SIEM links events from multiple sources (firewall, endpoint, authentication, proxy) that share attributes like IP, user, or timestamp, revealing the sequence of an attack. This transforms isolated alerts into a coherent narrative — for example, linking a failed login spike to a successful login from a new geography to a lateral movement alert — which is the primary advantage for incident analysis.

Exam trap

The trap is that 'automatically blocks' and 'replaces human analysis' sound like powerful SIEM capabilities, but correlation is fundamentally an analysis and enrichment function, not an enforcement or autonomous decision-making one.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because correlation does not reduce storage; if anything, retaining correlated events and their context may increase storage needs. Option C is wrong because correlation is an analysis function — blocking is performed by SOAR playbooks, firewalls, or EDR, not by the correlation engine itself. Option D is wrong because correlation augments human analysis by surfacing patterns; it does not replace the analyst's judgment, which is still required to validate and respond to findings.

180
MCQmedium

You are choosing a destination for forensic image storage. What is the most critical characteristic of this storage?

A.Write-protection and tamper-evident logging
B.Fast read/write speeds
C.Cloud-based accessibility
D.High storage capacity
AnswerA

Forensic images must remain unaltered to retain evidentiary value, so the storage must enforce write-protection preventing modification and tamper-evident logging recording any access attempt. This preserves integrity and chain of custody, satisfying the requirement that the image be admissible and verifiable.

Why this answer

The storage must be write-blocked or read-only once data is written to ensure the evidence cannot be altered.

181
Multi-Selectmedium

A financial institution's SOC detects anomalous SMB traffic from a workstation to multiple servers, including attempts to access ADMIN$ shares. Which TWO of the following artifacts should an incident responder prioritize to confirm lateral movement via SMB? (Choose two.)

Select 2 answers
A.Windows Security Event ID 5140 for network share access
B.Windows Security Event ID 4776 for credential validation
C.Windows Security Event ID 4688 with process name psexec.exe
D.Windows Security Event ID 4624 with Logon Type 3
E.Windows Security Event ID 5156 for Windows Filtering Platform connection
AnswersA, D

Event ID 5140 is generated when a network share is accessed. It records the share name, the account used, and the source IP address. In the context of suspected SMB lateral movement, a burst of 5140 events for administrative shares like ADMIN$ or C$ from a single workstation to multiple servers is a direct indicator of an attacker enumerating and accessing remote shares. This event provides concrete evidence of the lateral movement attempt.

Why this answer

To confirm SMB lateral movement, focus on events that show network logons and share access. Event ID 4624 with Logon Type 3 records network logons, which are used when connecting to SMB shares. Event ID 5140 logs access to network shares, including administrative shares.

Together, they provide evidence of an attacker using compromised credentials to access remote systems via SMB. Other events either lack specificity or do not directly indicate SMB share access.

Exam trap

The trap here is choosing process creation events like psexec.exe or credential validation events, which are often associated with lateral movement but do not specifically confirm SMB share access and network logon patterns.

182
MCQhard

A security analyst is investigating a suspected data exfiltration incident. The analyst reviews NetFlow records and notices a large outbound data transfer from an internal server to an external IP address over TCP port 53. Which of the following is the MOST likely explanation for this activity?

A.The server is using DNS tunneling to exfiltrate data.
B.The server is updating its DNS records dynamically.
C.The server is querying a large number of DNS records for a legitimate application.
D.The server is performing a legitimate DNS zone transfer.
AnswerA

DNS tunneling involves encoding data within DNS queries and responses, often using TCP port 53 for larger transfers. A large outbound data transfer to an external IP over TCP port 53 is a strong indicator of DNS tunneling, as legitimate DNS traffic is typically small and uses UDP. Attackers use this method to bypass firewalls that allow DNS traffic.

Why this answer

The correct answer is DNS tunneling. A large outbound data transfer over TCP port 53 from an internal server to an external IP is highly suspicious because normal DNS traffic is small and usually UDP-based. Attackers use DNS tunneling to encode stolen data in DNS queries, exploiting the fact that DNS is often allowed through firewalls.

This allows them to exfiltrate data stealthily.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that any traffic on port 53 is benign DNS, overlooking that attackers can abuse DNS for tunneling and data exfiltration.

183
MCQmedium

You are auditing Apache logs to detect potential OS command injection. Which characters should you search for in the access logs?

A.'%20', '+', and '='
B.'{', '}', and '$'
C.'<', '>', and '/'
D.';', '|', '&', and '`'
AnswerD

Shell metacharacters ';', '|', '&' and '`' allow command chaining, piping and substitution, so their appearance in Apache access logs signals attempted OS command injection. Searching for these satisfies the audit requirement to detect injection attempts against web-facing services.

Why this answer

OS command injection payloads use shell metacharacters to chain or execute additional commands: semicolon (;), pipe (|), ampersand (&), and backtick (`) are the classic separators and command substitution operators. Searching access logs for these characters reveals attempts to append commands like '; cat /etc/passwd' or '| whoami'.

Exam trap

The trap is confusing URL-encoding characters (%20, +, =) with shell metacharacters; only the latter are relevant to command injection detection.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because %20 (space), +, and = are URL-encoding and query-string characters, not shell metacharacters. Option B is wrong because {, }, and $ are used in variable expansion and scripting but are not the primary command-chaining operators in shell injection. Option C is wrong because <, >, and / are redirection and path characters; while > can redirect output, the canonical injection separators are ;, |, &, and `.

184
MCQmedium

You are performing initial containment on a cloud-based AWS EC2 instance. The instance is under a DDoS attack. What is the most effective way to isolate this specific resource?

A.Stop the EC2 instance immediately.
B.Remove the VPC from the region.
C.Delete the EC2 instance.
D.Modify the assigned Security Group to restrict all inbound/outbound traffic.
AnswerD

Security Groups act as stateful virtual firewalls at the instance's elastic network interface, so restricting all inbound and outbound rules immediately severs the EC2 instance's traffic without terminating it — satisfying the containment requirement while preserving forensic state.

Why this answer

Modifying the assigned Security Group to restrict all inbound and outbound traffic is the most effective way to isolate the EC2 instance because it immediately cuts off all network communication while preserving the instance's state for forensic analysis. This action is reversible and does not destroy evidence. Stopping the instance may still allow some network activity during shutdown and can lose volatile memory.

Deleting the instance destroys evidence. Removing the VPC is overly broad and affects other resources.

Exam trap

212-89 often tests the difference between containment and eradication, as candidates may choose to stop or delete the instance, which destroys evidence, rather than isolating it with Security Groups.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because stopping the EC2 instance may not immediately isolate it; it could take time, and the instance might still be reachable during shutdown, plus it loses volatile memory which is valuable for forensics. Option B is wrong because removing the VPC from the region is a drastic action that would affect all resources in the VPC, not just the instance, and is not a precise isolation method. Option C is wrong because deleting the EC2 instance destroys all evidence and does not allow for forensic analysis.

185
MCQmedium

An incident responder is investigating a suspected email-borne malware incident. The email contained a link that downloaded a file. The responder needs to determine the file's reputation and whether it has been seen in other campaigns. Which action should the responder take?

A.Submit the file hash to a threat intelligence platform or malware analysis service.
B.Run a full antivirus scan on the affected endpoint.
C.Open the file in a sandbox and observe its behavior.
D.Extract the file's strings and review them manually.
AnswerA

This is correct because submitting the file hash to a threat intelligence platform allows the responder to check if the file has been previously identified, what family it belongs to, and whether it is associated with known campaigns. This provides reputation data and helps determine if the incident is part of a broader attack, guiding containment and remediation efforts.

Why this answer

Submitting the file hash to a threat intelligence platform is the most direct way to obtain reputation data and determine if the file has been observed in other campaigns. This helps the responder understand the threat's prevalence and link it to known actors or malware families. Sandboxing, antivirus scans, and string extraction provide additional details but do not directly answer the reputation question.

Exam trap

The trap here is choosing sandboxing or antivirus scanning when the question specifically asks for reputation and campaign association, which threat intelligence platforms provide via hash lookup.

186
MCQeasy

An analyst is drafting an email to a user who reported a phishing attempt. What is the most important tone to maintain?

A.Professional, calm, and informative
B.Accusatory, to discourage clicking
C.Technical and jargon-heavy
D.Alarmist, to ensure they remain scared
AnswerA

A phishing reporter needs clear, factual guidance without alarm or blame, so they understand what happened and what to do next. A professional, calm, informative tone preserves trust and encourages prompt reporting of future attempts.

Why this answer

When responding to a user who reported a phishing attempt, the analyst's primary goal is to encourage future reporting and avoid discouraging the user. A professional, calm, and informative tone reassures the user that their action was correct, provides clear guidance without blame, and maintains trust in the security team. This approach aligns with incident response best practices, which emphasize positive reinforcement to foster a security-aware culture.

Accusatory, alarmist, or overly technical tones can backfire by making users defensive or confused, reducing the likelihood they will report future incidents.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that a strong emotional tone (accusatory or alarmist) is necessary to deter risky behavior, when in fact it undermines reporting and trust.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because an accusatory tone blames the user, which discourages reporting and damages trust; users may hide mistakes instead of reporting them. Option C is wrong because technical jargon can confuse non-technical users, preventing them from understanding the guidance and feeling alienated. Option D is wrong because an alarmist tone creates unnecessary fear and panic, which can lead to irrational actions and erode confidence in the security team's competence.

187
MCQmedium

During an investigation into lateral movement, you notice an unusual RDP connection from a workstation to a domain controller. Which Wireshark filter would be most effective in isolating only the RDP traffic associated with that specific source IP to identify potential credential dumping activity?

A.tcp.flags.syn == 1 && ip.src == 192.168.1.50
B.data.data == 3389
C.rdp.data && ip.dst == 192.168.1.50
D.tcp.port == 3389 && ip.src == 192.168.1.50
AnswerD

Combining tcp.port == 3389 with ip.src == 192.168.1.50 restricts capture to RDP sessions originating from the suspect workstation, filtering out unrelated port 3389 traffic. This isolates the lateral-movement flow toward the domain controller for credential-dumping analysis.

Why this answer

The filter 'tcp.port == 3389 && ip.src == 192.168.1.50' is correct because RDP operates over TCP port 3389, and the ip.src clause restricts capture to traffic originating from the specific workstation under investigation. This isolates the RDP session from that source to the domain controller, allowing the analyst to inspect the session for credential dumping artifacts or unusual keystroke patterns.

Exam trap

The trap is confusing source and destination IP filters or using non-existent display filters like 'rdp.data' — candidates must remember that RDP is TCP 3389 and that ip.src identifies the originating workstation, not the target server.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because 'tcp.flags.syn == 1 && ip.src == 192.168.1.50' captures only SYN packets from that source — it shows connection attempts but not the RDP session data needed to analyze credential dumping. Option B is wrong because 'data.data == 3389' matches payload bytes equal to 3389, which is not how RDP port filtering works and would miss the actual session traffic. Option C is wrong because 'rdp.data && ip.dst == 192.168.1.50' filters on destination IP (the workstation) rather than source, and the 'rdp.data' field is not a standard reliable Wireshark filter for isolating RDP sessions.

188
MCQeasy

A developer reports that a specific user is receiving 500 Internal Server Errors. Where is the first place to look to determine if this is an incident?

A.Error logs
B.Firewall logs
C.DNS logs
D.Access logs
AnswerA

Error logs capture the server-side exception trace for each failed request, letting you correlate the affected user's 500 responses and identify whether a misconfiguration, bug or attack caused them. This is the first diagnostic step before classifying the event as a security incident.

Why this answer

Error logs on the web server or application record 500 Internal Server Error events with stack traces, exception messages, and timestamps, making them the first place to determine whether the error is a benign bug or a sign of an incident (e.g., injection, resource exhaustion).

Exam trap

212-89 often tests whether candidates choose access logs (which show the 500 status but not the cause) instead of error logs, which contain the actual exception details needed to triage the incident.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because firewall logs show allowed/blocked network traffic, not application-level 500 errors. Option C is wrong because DNS logs show name resolution queries, which do not explain HTTP 500 responses. Option D is wrong because access logs show request metadata and status codes but not the underlying error cause; they complement but do not replace error logs.

189
MCQhard

An incident handler is analyzing a reported email that appears to come from a trusted partner. The message passed SPF and DKIM for the partner's domain, but the handler notices the display name matches the partner while the actual From address uses a look-alike domain with a single character difference. The message also contains a link to a document-sharing site. Which conclusion is MOST accurate?

A.The message is legitimate because SPF and DKIM passed for the partner's domain
B.The message is a false positive because the display name matches the partner
C.The message should be allowed because the document-sharing link is from a reputable service
D.The message is a look-alike domain spoofing attempt and should be treated as suspicious
AnswerD

The single-character difference in the From domain is a classic look-alike domain technique used to deceive recipients. Even though SPF and DKIM passed for the partner's domain, those results do not apply to the look-alike domain in the visible From address. The handler should treat the message as suspicious, analyze the link, and check DMARC alignment for the look-alike domain to confirm the spoofing attempt.

Why this answer

The look-alike From domain with a single-character difference is the decisive indicator of a spoofing attempt. SPF and DKIM passes for the partner's domain do not validate the look-alike domain, and display names and document-sharing links are not reliable trust signals. The handler should treat the message as suspicious, inspect the link safely, and verify DMARC alignment for the look-alike domain to confirm the deception.

Exam trap

The trap here is accepting SPF and DKIM passes as proof of legitimacy while ignoring that the visible From domain is a look-alike that those authentication results do not cover.

190
MCQhard

You are performing a triage on a server and see unauthorized outbound connections to a foreign IP. What is the best way to determine which process initiated the connection?

A.ping the IP address.
B.Run 'netstat -ano' to map the connection to a PID.
C.Check the ARP table.
D.Use 'ipconfig /all'.
AnswerB

netstat -ano lists active connections with their owning process ID, letting you correlate the foreign IP connection to the exact process. This maps network activity to a PID, which you then resolve to an executable, directly identifying the initiating process.

Why this answer

On Windows, 'netstat -ano' lists active connections with the owning Process ID (PID) via the -o switch, letting you map the foreign IP connection to the exact process. You then correlate the PID to a process name using Task Manager or 'tasklist /fi "pid eq <PID>"'. This is the fastest triage method to identify the responsible binary.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing network diagnostic tools — candidates may pick ARP or ping thinking they 'trace' the connection, but only netstat -ano maps a live connection to its owning process via PID.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because ping only tests ICMP reachability to the IP and reveals nothing about which local process opened the connection. Option C is wrong because the ARP table maps IP addresses to MAC addresses on the local subnet; it does not identify processes and is useless for foreign IPs beyond the local segment. Option D is wrong because 'ipconfig /all' displays local interface configuration (IP, DNS, MAC) and has no visibility into active connections or their owning processes.

191
MCQmedium

An attacker is using a specific User-Agent to scan your web application. How do you block them effectively?

A.Create a WAF rule to block requests with the specific User-Agent string
B.Disable all directory indexing on the server
C.Change the web server listening port
D.Update the server's hosts file
AnswerA

A WAF rule matching the offending User-Agent header drops those requests at the edge before they reach the application, directly satisfying the requirement to block the scanner. It is precise and low-cost, though the attacker could rotate the string, so pair it with rate-based rules.

Why this answer

A WAF rule that matches the specific User-Agent string and blocks matching requests is the most direct and effective control, because it targets the exact signature the attacker is using. WAFs like AWS WAF, Cloudflare, or ModSecurity can match on the User-Agent header via string-match or regex conditions and return a 403 before the request reaches the origin. This stops the scanner without affecting legitimate traffic that uses different User-Agents.

Exam trap

212-89 often tests the misconception that server-side hardening (directory indexing, port changes, hosts file) can block an active scanner, when only a request-inspection control like a WAF rule addresses the specific attack vector.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because disabling directory indexing only prevents listing of directory contents — it does nothing to block a scanner that is probing known paths or sending malicious requests. Option C is wrong because changing the listening port is security through obscurity and does not stop an attacker who can port-scan or who already knows the new port. Option D is wrong because the hosts file is a local DNS resolution mechanism on the server and has no effect on inbound HTTP requests from external attackers.

192
MCQhard

A web application is vulnerable to session fixation. What is the primary indicator of this attack in the logs?

A.High volume of requests to the login page without POST data
B.The same session ID is associated with two different IP addresses within a short timeframe
C.A sudden spike in failed login attempts
D.A user session ID remains identical before and after a successful authentication event
AnswerD

Session fixation succeeds when the attacker plants a known session identifier and the victim's authentication does not regenerate it. An unchanged session ID across the login boundary therefore evidences the flaw; legitimate implementations issue a fresh identifier upon successful authentication.

Why this answer

Session fixation occurs when an attacker sets or knows a victim's session ID before authentication and the application fails to regenerate that ID after login. The primary log indicator is therefore a session ID that remains identical before and after a successful authentication event. This persistence of the pre-authentication session identifier is the defining signature of the vulnerability being exploited.

Exam trap

212-89 often tests the distinction between session fixation (ID unchanged across login) and session hijacking (same ID from different IPs) — candidates confuse the two because both involve session IDs.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because a high volume of requests to the login page without POST data indicates probing or crawling, not session fixation. Option C is wrong because a spike in failed login attempts indicates brute-force or credential-stuffing activity, which is a different attack class. Option B is wrong because the same session ID used from two different IPs within a short timeframe indicates session hijacking or token theft, not fixation — in fixation the attacker plants the ID before the victim authenticates, so the IP pattern differs.

193
Multi-Selectmedium

Which TWO of the following are common network-based indicators of a compromised host attempting to perform network discovery?

Select 2 answers
A.Increase in DHCP release messages
B.High volume of TCP SYN packets to multiple ports
C.High volume of ARP requests to the entire subnet
D.Multiple HTTP 404 errors
E.Frequent DNS queries for internal hostnames
AnswersB, C

A high volume of TCP SYN packets across many ports indicates port scanning, the primary network-discovery technique. The half-open SYN sweep maps listening services without completing handshakes, directly satisfying the stem's requirement for a network-based indicator of discovery activity.

Why this answer

Option B is correct because a compromised host performing port scanning typically sends a high volume of TCP SYN packets to many ports on one or more targets, which is the classic signature of a SYN scan used for network discovery. Option C is correct because ARP scanning tools (e.g., arp-scan, nmap -PR) flood the local subnet with ARP requests to enumerate live hosts, producing a high volume of ARP traffic that is a common indicator of internal discovery activity. Option A is not a discovery indicator, since DHCP release messages simply relinquish an existing lease and are not associated with host enumeration.

Option D is unrelated, as HTTP 404 errors reflect web content requests rather than network discovery. Option E is not a network-based discovery indicator in the same sense, because DNS queries for internal hostnames are normal resolver behavior and do not by themselves indicate scanning or enumeration of the network.

Exam trap

212-89 often tests whether candidates can distinguish network-layer discovery indicators (SYN scans, ARP sweeps) from application-layer noise (404s, DNS queries) — picking plausible but non-network indicators is the common mistake.

194
Multi-Selectmedium

Which TWO of the following are primary objectives of the 'Lessons Learned' phase?

Select 2 answers
A.Deleting all incident records to protect privacy
B.Assigning financial bonuses to the team
C.Updating policies and procedures to prevent recurrence
D.Testing the backup power supply of the building
E.Identifying security gaps in the current response process
AnswersC, E

Lessons Learned converts findings into durable change. Revising policies, procedures and controls addresses the root causes identified during the review, reducing the likelihood of the same incident recurring and satisfying the phase's forward-looking remediation objective.

Why this answer

Option C is correct because the Lessons Learned phase exists to feed findings back into the organization's documentation, so updating policies, procedures, and controls to prevent recurrence of the incident is a primary objective. Option E is correct because a core purpose of the post-incident review is to identify security gaps and weaknesses in the current response process, such as missed detection opportunities or ineffective containment steps, so they can be remediated. The remaining options do not belong: A is wrong because incident records and evidence must be retained for legal, forensic, and compliance purposes rather than deleted, B is wrong because assigning financial bonuses is a human-resources matter unrelated to the review's objectives, and D is wrong because testing a building's backup power supply is a routine maintenance or contingency test, not an objective of the Lessons Learned phase.

Exam trap

212-89 often tests phase objectives — the trap is selecting operational or HR actions (deleting records, bonuses, facilities testing) that sound administrative but do not match the improvement-focused purpose of Lessons Learned.

195
Multi-Selecthard

During the preparation phase, an organization is developing its incident response plan. Which TWO of the following are essential elements that should be included to ensure effective incident handling? (Choose two.)

Select 2 answers
A.A list of all software installed on every endpoint.
B.A detailed contact list of all employees in the organization.
C.A schedule for regular vulnerability scans.
D.Defined roles and responsibilities for the incident response team.
E.A communication plan that includes internal and external stakeholders.
AnswersD, E

Clearly defined roles and responsibilities ensure that team members know what is expected of them during an incident. This prevents confusion, avoids duplication of effort, and speeds up response. It is a fundamental component of any incident response plan, as it establishes accountability and streamlines coordination. Without it, response efforts can become chaotic, leading to delays and potential mistakes.

Why this answer

An effective incident response plan must define roles and responsibilities to ensure clear accountability and coordination. It also requires a robust communication plan to manage information flow to both internal and external stakeholders. These elements enable a swift and organized response.

A full employee contact list, a complete software inventory, and a vulnerability scan schedule, while potentially useful, are not core components of the IR plan and do not directly facilitate incident handling.

Exam trap

The trap here is including operational security measures like vulnerability scans or asset inventories as core IR plan elements, when the plan should focus on people, process, and communication.

196
Multi-Selecthard

When responding to a SQL injection incident, which TWO areas of the database server logs should be prioritized for review?

Select 2 answers
A.Operating system kernel logs
B.Database backup completion logs
C.Database user activity/audit logs
D.Network interface statistics
E.Database query execution logs
AnswersC, E

Database user activity and audit logs record executed statements, timestamps, source accounts and client addresses, exposing the injected query and the compromised credentials. Reviewing them reconstructs which accounts ran anomalous SQL, satisfying the need to identify the injection vector and affected data during the SQL injection response.

Why this answer

Option C (database user activity/audit logs) is correct because audit logs record authentication events, privilege changes, and the specific accounts and source hosts involved in suspicious activity, which is essential for identifying who executed the injection and what they accessed. Option E (database query execution logs) is correct because they capture the actual SQL statements sent to the server, allowing responders to spot injected payloads such as UNION SELECT, OR 1=1, or stacked queries and to determine which tables or data were touched. Together these two log sources provide the attacker identity and the malicious query evidence needed for containment and forensic reconstruction.

Option A (OS kernel logs) is not prioritized because it deals with hardware, driver, and system-level events rather than SQL activity. Option B (backup completion logs) only shows whether backup jobs succeeded and has no bearing on detecting or tracing an injection. Option D (network interface statistics) provides traffic counters and throughput data, not the application-layer SQL content or user context required for this investigation.

Exam trap

The trap is confusing infrastructure-layer logs (kernel, network, backup) with application/database-layer logs — candidates must recognize that SQL injection evidence lives in database audit and query logs, not OS or network telemetry.

197
MCQmedium

During a network incident, you capture traffic and notice a workstation repeatedly sending TCP SYN packets to a single external IP on port 443, but the external host never responds. The workstation then sends the same SYN to a different external IP on port 443. Which network artifact best characterizes this behavior?

A.TCP session hijacking attempt
B.TCP SYN scan targeting a single port across multiple hosts
C.Slowloris denial-of-service attack
D.UDP flood denial-of-service attack
AnswerB

The repeated SYN packets to a single port on multiple external IPs, with no completed handshake, is classic TCP SYN scanning behavior. An incident handler identifies this as reconnaissance or an attempt to find an open service. The lack of response is expected because the scanner is probing many hosts, and the consistent destination port suggests a targeted service discovery.

Why this answer

The workstation is sending TCP SYN packets to a single port on multiple external IP addresses without completing the three-way handshake. This is characteristic of a TCP SYN scan, often used for reconnaissance to identify live hosts and open ports. The incident handler should recognize this as scanning activity, which may precede an attack and warrants further investigation.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that because the destination port is 443, the traffic is legitimate HTTPS and not a scan.

198
MCQeasy

During an incident, why is it important to keep the 'Incident Log' updated in real-time?

A.To provide an accurate, chronological record for the final report
B.To keep the team busy
C.To allow management to monitor the team's progress
D.To comply with IT service desk ticket requirements
AnswerA

Real-time logging preserves the exact sequence and timestamps of containment, escalation and recovery actions while they occur. That chronological record underpins the final incident report, supports root-cause analysis, and provides defensible evidence, satisfying the stem's need for an accurate timeline.

Why this answer

A real-time log ensures an accurate, contemporaneous record of actions, which is vital for later analysis and legal defense.

199
Multi-Selecthard

You are handling a confirmed email incident involving a malicious attachment that executed on several endpoints. Which TWO actions should you take to scope the incident and prevent further execution across the organization? (Choose two.)

Select 2 answers
A.Disable all outbound email for the tenant until the sender is identified
B.Search mail logs and the security portal for the message hash, subject, and sender to identify all recipients
C.Send a company-wide email describing the incident and asking users to delete any matching message
D.Restore the affected endpoints from the most recent backup before analyzing the payload
E.Create a block rule for the file hash and sender domain in the email gateway and endpoint protection platform
AnswersB, E

Enumerating every recipient of the same message defines the true scope and reveals endpoints that may already be compromised. Without this step, containment is based on guesswork and additional executions can occur on machines the handler did not know received the message.

Why this answer

Scoping requires finding every recipient through mail logs and the security portal, and prevention requires blocking the known-bad hash and sender domain at the gateway and endpoint layers. Together these actions identify affected endpoints and close the delivery path, while broad notifications, premature restores, and tenant-wide outbound blocks are either ineffective or disproportionate.

Exam trap

The trap here is choosing broad disruption such as tenant-wide mail blocking instead of targeted scoping and blocking actions.

200
MCQmedium

When documenting evidence for a forensic investigation, you are required to establish a chain of custody. Which information is considered mandatory for each entry in the chain of custody log to satisfy legal requirements?

A.Name of the person transferring the evidence, the receiver, date/time, and the specific storage location.
B.The name of the software used to perform the collection.
C.The BIOS serial number and hard drive firmware version.
D.The hash values of the collected files.
AnswerA

Legally defensible chain of custody requires each transfer to record who released the evidence, who received it, the exact date and time, and where it was stored. These four elements let a court trace unbroken possession from seizure to presentation.

Why this answer

A chain of custody log must document the sequence of custody, control, transfer, and disposition of evidence. Mandatory entries include the name of the person transferring the evidence, the receiver, the date and time of transfer, and the specific storage location. This information ensures that evidence is admissible in legal proceedings by proving it has not been tampered with.

Exam trap

212-89 often tests the distinction between chain of custody documentation and forensic report details, tempting candidates to include technical data like hashes or software names in the custody log.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because the name of the software used for collection is part of the forensic report, not the chain of custody log; while it may be referenced, it is not a mandatory entry for each custody transfer. Option C is wrong because BIOS serial number and hard drive firmware version are technical details that may be documented during acquisition but are not required for each chain of custody entry. Option D is wrong because hash values are critical for verifying integrity but are typically recorded in the forensic report and on the evidence bag, not as a mandatory field for every custody transfer entry.

201
Multi-Selecthard

Which TWO log file attributes are essential for identifying the source of an attack coming through a load balancer?

Select 2 answers
A.Server uptime count
B.X-Forwarded-For header
C.Local time of the web server
D.The load balancer's internal management port
E.Original Request-URI
AnswersB, E

The X-Forwarded-For header preserves the originating client IP address, which the load balancer would otherwise mask by rewriting the source to its own address. This satisfies the stem's need to trace an attack's true source through the proxy layer.

Why this answer

The X-Forwarded-For header (B) is essential because a load balancer typically terminates the client connection and proxies the request, so the web server's own logs would only show the load balancer's IP; X-Forwarded-For preserves the original client IP address needed to trace the attack source. The Original Request-URI (E) is also essential because it records exactly which resource or path the attacker requested, allowing correlation of the malicious request across the load balancer and backend server logs. Server uptime count (A) is irrelevant to attack attribution, as it only indicates how long the server has been running.

Local time of the web server (C) is useful for correlating events but does not by itself identify the source of the attack. The load balancer's internal management port (D) is unrelated to client request tracing and would not reveal the attacker's origin.

202
MCQhard

During an incident, a responder needs to capture the ARP cache to identify potential local spoofing. Which tool provides this information?

A.ipconfig /displaydns
B.route print
C.arp -a
D.netstat -s
AnswerC

The arp -a command displays the local ARP cache, listing IP-to-MAC mappings for recently contacted hosts. Inspecting these entries reveals duplicate or conflicting MAC addresses indicative of ARP spoofing on the local segment, satisfying the responder's need.

Why this answer

The 'arp -a' command shows the current Address Resolution Protocol cache on a Windows or Linux system.

203
MCQmedium

Which of the following is a symptom of an 'Email Forwarding Rule' attack?

A.The user's inbox is empty
B.Emails are being forwarded to an external address
C.The mailbox reached its size limit
D.The password was changed
AnswerB

Forwarding to an external address directly evidences the attacker-created inbox rule, which silently redirects mail outside the organisation. This satisfies the stem's requirement for a symptom, since the unauthorised external recipient is the observable artefact of the rule, unlike mailbox quota or login anomalies.

Why this answer

Attackers set up auto-forwarding rules to intercept sensitive business communications without the user's knowledge.

204
MCQhard

A security analyst receives an alert about a possible data exfiltration from a compromised workstation. The analyst needs to determine the scope of the incident by identifying other systems that may have communicated with the same command-and-control (C2) server. Which data source is most effective for this correlation during the identification phase?

A.Firewall and proxy logs aggregated in a SIEM.
B.Windows Event Logs from the domain controller.
C.Email gateway logs for inbound messages.
D.Antivirus logs from the endpoint protection console.
AnswerA

Firewall and proxy logs contain detailed records of network connections, including source and destination IP addresses, ports, and timestamps. When aggregated in a SIEM, they enable correlation across multiple systems to identify all hosts that communicated with the C2 server. This provides a comprehensive view of the incident scope, allowing the analyst to quickly isolate other compromised endpoints. It is the most effective data source for network-based correlation during the identification phase.

Why this answer

Firewall and proxy logs, especially when centralized in a SIEM, provide the network visibility needed to identify all hosts communicating with a known malicious IP or domain. This correlation is essential for scoping a data exfiltration incident, as it reveals other potentially compromised systems. Antivirus, domain controller, and email logs each offer valuable but different perspectives; none provide the direct network connection data required to track C2 communications across the enterprise.

Exam trap

The trap here is focusing on endpoint-centric logs like antivirus or event logs, which may confirm infection on one host but fail to reveal the broader network scope of the incident.

205
Multi-Selectmedium

Which THREE indicators in a web access log suggest a directory traversal attempt?

Select 3 answers
A.Repeated access to sensitive files like 'passwd' or 'config.php'
B.URL parameters containing system file paths
C.Presence of '../' sequences
D.Requests for CSS files
E.High number of image file requests
AnswersA, B, C

Repeated requests for files such as 'passwd' or 'config.php' reveal an attacker probing outside the web root, satisfying the indicator of directory traversal. Traversal payloads commonly target these credential and configuration files, so their recurrence in a web access log signals deliberate path-escalation attempts rather than normal browsing.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because directory traversal attacks aim to reach files outside the web root, so repeated requests for sensitive files such as 'passwd' (e.g., /etc/passwd) or 'config.php' in the access log strongly indicate an attempt to read protected system or application files. Option B is correct because URL parameters containing system file paths (e.g., ?file=/etc/passwd or ?page=C:\Windows\win.ini) show an attacker trying to supply an absolute path to force the application to disclose a local file. Option C is correct because the '../' sequence (dot-dot-slash) is the canonical traversal payload used to climb out of the web directory, and its presence in a requested URL is a direct signature of path traversal.

Option D is not correct because requests for CSS files are normal static-resource traffic and do not by themselves indicate traversal. Option E is not correct because a high number of image file requests is typical of legitimate page rendering or caching and is not a traversal indicator.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing normal web traffic (like CSS or image requests) with malicious indicators; candidates might overthink and select benign requests as suspicious, but directory traversal specifically involves path manipulation and sensitive file targeting.

206
MCQeasy

During a web application incident, you review logs and find requests containing the string 'UNION SELECT username, password FROM users' in the id parameter. The database server log shows the corresponding query executed successfully and returned rows. Which type of web application attack does this evidence confirm?

A.Cross-site scripting
B.Cross-site request forgery
C.SQL injection
D.Server-side request forgery
AnswerC

The request parameter contains SQL syntax that alters the intended query, and the database log confirms the injected UNION statement executed and returned data. This is the defining behavior of SQL injection, where untrusted input is concatenated into a query without proper parameterization. The evidence directly confirms successful exploitation and data retrieval from the users table.

Why this answer

The presence of SQL syntax in a user-supplied parameter, combined with a database log entry showing that injected statement executed and returned rows, confirms SQL injection. The attacker manipulated the query structure to append a UNION SELECT and retrieve credential data. This evidence supports immediate containment such as blocking the source, reviewing the vulnerable parameter, and assessing what data was exposed.

Exam trap

The trap here is focusing on the word 'users' and assuming a browser-side or session attack, when the database log proving an injected query executed is the decisive artifact.

207
MCQmedium

You are assessing the effectiveness of a containment strategy for a worm spreading through the network. What is the most effective metric to use?

A.Total time spent by the IR team
B.Number of emails sent by the IR team
C.The rate of new successful infections
D.Total number of systems scanned
AnswerC

Containment succeeds only if the worm stops propagating, so the rate of new successful infections measures residual spread directly. Hosts cleaned or segments isolated are outputs, but this metric captures whether the strategy actually halts transmission across the network.

Why this answer

The rate of new successful infections directly measures whether the containment strategy is actually stopping the worm from spreading to new hosts, which is the definition of containment effectiveness. A declining infection rate indicates the worm is being contained; a rising or flat rate indicates the strategy is failing. This metric is outcome-focused and tied to the adversary's propagation capability.

Exam trap

212-89 often tests the confusion between activity metrics (time spent, emails sent, systems scanned) and outcome metrics (infection rate), expecting candidates to recognize that only the latter measures containment effectiveness.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because total IR team time measures effort and cost, not containment effectiveness; a team could spend enormous time and still fail to stop the worm. Option B is wrong because the number of emails sent is a communication activity metric, entirely unrelated to whether the worm is being contained. Option D is wrong because the total number of systems scanned measures detection coverage or effort, not whether new infections are being prevented; scanning more systems without reducing infection rate does not indicate successful containment.

208
Multi-Selectmedium

During the triage of a Linux server, you suspect a rootkit is intercepting system calls. Which THREE actions are appropriate for the first responder to perform to gather evidence of the rootkit?

Select 3 answers
A.Compare the md5sum of critical binaries against a known-good baseline.
B.Capture a full memory dump for offline analysis with Volatility.
C.Reinstall the OS immediately to ensure cleanliness.
D.Run 'chkdsk' to look for file system errors.
E.Run 'lsmod' to identify suspicious or unsigned kernel modules.
AnswersA, B, E

Rootkits often replace or trojanise system binaries, so hashing critical executables and comparing against a trusted baseline reveals tampering. This satisfies the need to gather evidence of intercepted system calls without altering the compromised host.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because comparing md5sum hashes of critical binaries (e.g., /bin/ls, /bin/ps) against a known-good baseline detects trojanized executables that a rootkit may have replaced. Option B is correct because a rootkit intercepting system calls often resides in kernel memory, and capturing a full memory dump for offline analysis with Volatility preserves volatile evidence such as hidden processes, hooks, and loaded modules. Option E is correct because running 'lsmod' lists loaded kernel modules, allowing the responder to spot suspicious or unsigned modules that could implement the system-call interception.

Option C is not appropriate because reinstalling the OS destroys evidence and is a remediation step, not evidence gathering. Option D is not appropriate because 'chkdsk' is a Windows utility for file-system errors and is irrelevant on Linux, where fsck would be used and would not reveal a rootkit.

Exam trap

The trap is that remediation actions (reinstall OS) and generic troubleshooting commands (chkdsk) look like reasonable first-responder steps, but the exam tests whether you know that evidence preservation must precede remediation and that chkdsk is Windows-only.

209
MCQhard

An analyst identifies that an email originated from an unauthorized IP address despite passing SPF. What is the most likely cause?

A.The user's computer is infected
B.The SPF record is too broad
C.The domain has no DMARC record
D.The mail server was misconfigured
AnswerB

An overly permissive SPF record, such as one ending in `+all` or including wide CIDR ranges, authorises IP addresses beyond the organisation's legitimate senders. This satisfies the stem's constraint: mail passed SPF yet originated from an unauthorised IP, because that address fell within the record's authorised scope. Tightening the mechanism to `-all` and specific hosts prevents this.

Why this answer

SPF authorizes sending IPs via DNS TXT records. If the record uses an overly broad mechanism such as 'include' of a large third-party range, '+all', or a wide CIDR, an unauthorized IP inside that range will still pass SPF. The most likely cause is therefore an SPF record that is too permissive, allowing the spoofed source to authenticate.

Exam trap

The trap is assuming that 'SPF passed' means the sender is legitimate — SPF only proves the IP is authorized by the domain's DNS record, which can be overly permissive.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because a user's infected computer would not cause an email to pass SPF — SPF validates the sending MTA's IP against DNS, not the recipient's endpoint. Option C is wrong because a missing DMARC record affects policy enforcement and alignment reporting, but does not by itself cause SPF to pass for an unauthorized IP; SPF evaluation is independent of DMARC. Option D is wrong because a misconfigured mail server would typically cause SPF to fail or the mail to be rejected, not to pass for an unauthorized source.

210
MCQhard

During a web application incident, you discover that an attacker is exfiltrating data through HTTP responses by abusing a deserialization endpoint. The endpoint returns serialized objects that include base64-encoded fields. Which technique should you use to identify the exfiltrated data within captured network traffic?

A.Review outbound SMTP traffic for attachments sent from the web server to external addresses.
B.Inspect DNS query logs for unusually long TXT records originating from the web server.
C.Search the packet capture for HTTP 200 responses to the deserialization endpoint and decode the base64 fields in the response bodies.
D.Analyze ICMP packet payloads for embedded file fragments leaving the network.
AnswerC

The scenario states the exfiltration occurs through HTTP responses from the deserialization endpoint, and the payloads are base64-encoded. Filtering for successful responses to that endpoint isolates the relevant traffic, and decoding the base64 fields reveals the exfiltrated content. This directly follows the described attack channel and encoding.

Why this answer

When exfiltration is described as occurring through HTTP responses from a specific endpoint, the packet capture must be filtered to that endpoint and response direction. Because the payloads are base64-encoded, decoding the response bodies exposes the exfiltrated data. Other channels such as DNS, SMTP, or ICMP are unrelated to the described mechanism and would not contain the relevant evidence.

Exam trap

The trap here is gravitating toward covert channels like DNS or ICMP tunneling when the scenario explicitly describes application-layer exfiltration through HTTP responses with a specific encoding.

211
MCQhard

During a first response to a Linux web server suspected of compromise, you notice that the root account's command history file has been truncated and that the system binaries /bin/ps and /bin/netstat have modification times newer than the kernel package. You must preserve trustworthy evidence. Which action best addresses the integrity concern before you rely on those binaries?

A.Change the file modification timestamps back to their original values using touch, then proceed with normal collection.
B.Run the binaries from a statically linked trusted toolkit on read-only media and compare their output with the on-disk versions.
C.Reinstall the procps and net-tools packages from the distribution repository, then rerun ps and netstat.
D.Reboot into single-user mode so the binaries are reloaded fresh from disk before collecting data.
AnswerB

Using a statically linked toolkit on read-only media ensures the tools you execute are not the potentially trojanized system binaries. Comparing outputs reveals discrepancies that indicate userland rootkit tampering, while the read-only medium guarantees your collection tools cannot be altered by the compromised host during the response.

Why this answer

When system binaries may be trojanized, output from those binaries cannot be trusted. Executing equivalent tools from a statically linked toolkit on read-only media removes dependence on the compromised userland, and side-by-side comparison highlights discrepancies caused by rootkit replacement. This preserves both the original tampered binaries as evidence and the integrity of the collected data.

Exam trap

The trap here is trusting the output of on-disk system utilities on a host where userland binaries show signs of tampering, instead of using known-good tools from external media.

212
MCQhard

You are using YARA to detect a specific strain of ransomware. You want to match a file if it contains a specific hex string OR a specific string value. How do you construct this in your rule?

A.condition: $a + $b
B.condition: $a != $b
C.condition: $a && $b
D.condition: $a or $b
AnswerD

The condition section with the OR operator evaluates both string identifiers, matching the file when either $a or $b is found. This satisfies the requirement to detect files containing the hex string or the string value.

Why this answer

YARA uses the 'or' operator within the condition section to evaluate multiple criteria, allowing a match if either condition is met.

213
MCQmedium

You need to capture forensic data from a Windows machine using a remote agent. What is the risk of using built-in administrative tools like PowerShell for this?

A.They leave significant forensic footprints on the target system.
B.They are always blocked by the firewall.
C.They cannot collect binary data.
D.They require the system to be offline.
AnswerA

PowerShell and similar built-in administrative tools write to event logs, prefetch, and command history, altering the target system's state and overwriting volatile evidence. This satisfies the stem's remote-agent constraint by showing that such tools compromise forensic integrity through unavoidable artefacts on the machine being examined.

Why this answer

Built-in administrative tools like PowerShell are already present on Windows and, when used for remote forensic collection, generate artifacts — command history, event logs (e.g., PowerShell Operational log, Event ID 4104 script block logging), prefetch entries, and process creation events (4688). These footprints can alert an attacker, contaminate the evidence, and complicate the timeline reconstruction. That is the primary risk of using them for live forensic acquisition.

Exam trap

The trap is assuming built-in tools are 'safe' because they are native — candidates overlook that their very presence and logging create forensic footprints that can alert attackers and taint evidence.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because PowerShell is not 'always blocked by the firewall' — it is a local tool and typically allowed; firewall rules govern network traffic, not local script execution. Option C is wrong because PowerShell can collect binary data (it can read files, registry hives, and memory via cmdlets or .NET calls), so the claim that it cannot collect binary data is false. Option D is wrong because remote agents are specifically designed to collect from live, running systems — requiring the system to be offline contradicts the premise of remote forensic acquisition and is not a risk of PowerShell.

214
MCQhard

During a forensic investigation of a compromised Linux server, you need to collect volatile data from memory. The server is running critical services and cannot be taken offline. Which method is most appropriate for capturing memory while minimizing disruption?

A.Use the dd command to copy /dev/mem to an external drive.
B.Install and run a kernel module such as LiME (Linux Memory Extractor) to dump memory to a remote location or external storage.
C.Use the gcore command to dump the memory of all running processes, then combine them into a single image.
D.Trigger a kernel panic to force a memory dump to the swap partition, then recover it later.
AnswerB

LiME is a loadable kernel module designed for volatile memory acquisition on Linux. It allows capturing memory to a file or over the network without requiring a system reboot, minimizing disruption to running services. It is a widely accepted tool in incident response for live memory forensics, ensuring evidence integrity and minimal impact.

Why this answer

LiME is specifically designed for live memory acquisition on Linux, allowing responders to capture RAM without rebooting or significantly disrupting services. It loads as a kernel module and can write the memory image to a file or send it over the network, preserving evidence integrity. Other methods like /dev/mem or gcore are either unreliable, incomplete, or disruptive, making LiME the most appropriate choice for this scenario.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that traditional tools like dd on /dev/mem or gcore can capture full system memory, when they are actually limited or obsolete for modern Linux systems.

215
MCQmedium

While responding to a confirmed cross-site scripting (XSS) incident on a public web application, you need to determine whether the attacker exfiltrated session cookies. The application uses HTTPS and sets cookies without the HttpOnly flag. Which evidence source is MOST likely to reveal the stolen cookie values?

A.The TLS certificate transparency log for the web application's domain
B.Outbound proxy or firewall logs showing requests to an attacker-controlled domain with cookie data in the URL
C.The database transaction log for the users table
D.The web server's access log entries showing HTTP 200 responses to /login
AnswerB

Because the cookie lacks HttpOnly, injected JavaScript can read document.cookie and send it to an external collector, often as a query string or image request. Egress proxy or firewall logs capture the destination domain and full URL, so they can reveal the exfiltration channel and the encoded cookie value, which is the key evidence needed to confirm theft.

Why this answer

When an XSS payload reads a cookie that lacks the HttpOnly attribute and sends it to an external collector, the theft occurs over the network rather than in server-side application logs. Egress proxy or firewall logs capture the destination and full request URL, exposing the attacker-controlled endpoint and the encoded session token. This directly confirms exfiltration and supports containment actions such as blocking the collector domain and invalidating sessions.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming the victim web server's own access log will contain the stolen cookie, when exfiltration actually travels outbound to an attacker-controlled collector.

216
Multi-Selecthard

Which THREE of the following could be considered 'indicators of compromise' (IOCs) for an email incident?

Select 3 answers
A.Malicious URL within the email body
B.The name of the email service provider
C.Sender IP address
D.MD5 or SHA-256 hash of an attachment
E.The user's password
AnswersA, C, D

A malicious URL embedded in the email body is a concrete, observable artefact indicating compromise intent, letting analysts block the domain and trace related messages. It qualifies as a host or network-based IOC within email incident triage.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because a malicious URL embedded in the email body is a classic host- or network-based IOC that defenders can extract, block at the proxy/email gateway, and pivot on to find other recipients. Option C is correct because the sender IP address is a network-based IOC that can be checked against threat-intel feeds, blocklists, and SPF/DKIM authentication results to identify the originating infrastructure. Option D is correct because the MD5 or SHA-256 hash of an attachment is a file-based IOC that uniquely identifies the malicious payload and can be used for hash-blocking and endpoint/AV hunting.

Option B does not belong because the name of the email service provider is a benign, generic attribute that does not by itself indicate compromise. Option E does not belong because a user's password is a credential, not an observable artifact of an attack, and its exposure would be a consequence rather than an IOC.

Exam trap

212-89 often tests the definition of an IOC, tricking candidates into selecting benign metadata (like the email provider) or sensitive data (like a password) that are not observable compromise artifacts.

217
MCQmedium

A finance workstation running Windows 10 begins displaying a full-screen message demanding Bitcoin payment and encrypts files with the .locky extension. The user reports the machine is still powered on and connected to the corporate network. As the incident handler, which action should you take FIRST to preserve volatile evidence?

A.Run a full antivirus scan and quarantine all detected files.
B.Capture a forensic image of the physical hard drive using a write blocker.
C.Immediately disconnect the workstation from the network and power it off.
D.Acquire a live memory dump using a tool such as Magnet RAM Capture or WinPmem.
AnswerD

Volatile data in RAM, including running processes, network connections, and possibly encryption keys, will be lost on shutdown or reboot. Capturing a live memory dump first preserves this evidence while the machine is still powered on. This aligns with the order of volatility principle and supports later malware analysis and potential decryption.

Why this answer

Because the workstation is still powered on, volatile data in RAM, including process lists, network connections, and potential encryption keys, remains available. The order of volatility dictates that this evidence be captured before any shutdown, disconnection, or remediation action. Acquiring a live memory dump first preserves the most perishable evidence and supports subsequent malware analysis and containment decisions.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that isolating the machine by powering it off is always the correct first step, when doing so destroys volatile evidence that cannot be recovered later.

218
Multi-Selectmedium

Which THREE items should be included in an incident report following a successful SQL injection attack?

Select 3 answers
A.A list of potentially affected data or databases
B.The personal name of the person who discovered the attack
C.The exact physical address of the data center
D.The specific attack vector and payload used
E.The remediation steps performed to close the vulnerability
AnswersA, D, E

Listing potentially affected data or databases satisfies the stem's requirement to document breach scope, enabling impact assessment and notification duties. An incident report must identify which records the SQL injection exposed, since containment and regulatory escalation depend on knowing the compromised data sets, not merely the attack vector.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because an incident report must scope the breach by identifying which data or databases may have been exposed, enabling impact assessment and notification obligations. Option D is correct because documenting the specific attack vector and payload (for example, the vulnerable parameter and injected SQL syntax) is essential for root-cause analysis and for reproducing and validating the fix. Option E is correct because recording the remediation steps performed to close the vulnerability provides an auditable record of containment and eradication and supports verification that the flaw no longer exists.

Option B does not belong because the discoverer's personal name is not a required technical or impact element of the report, and Option C does not belong because the data center's exact physical address is irrelevant to describing the SQL injection incident, its scope, or its remediation.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates might select options that seem relevant but are not core to an incident report, such as the discoverer's name or data center address, confusing peripheral details with essential technical and remediation documentation.

219
MCQeasy

After a major security breach, you are tasked with conducting a lessons learned meeting. Which of the following is the PRIMARY objective of this meeting?

A.To immediately update the incident response plan with new technical controls.
B.To identify improvements to the incident response process and prevent recurrence.
C.To assign blame to the individuals responsible for the breach.
D.To determine the exact financial cost of the incident.
AnswerB

The primary objective of a lessons learned meeting is to review the incident and response to identify what worked well and what needs improvement. This includes updating policies, procedures, and training to prevent similar incidents. It is a constructive, forward-looking activity that enhances the organization's resilience and response capabilities.

Why this answer

The primary objective of a lessons learned meeting is to identify improvements to the incident response process and prevent recurrence. It is a constructive review that focuses on what happened, why, and how to enhance future response. Blame, cost calculation, or immediate plan updates are secondary or separate activities.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing the lessons learned meeting with a blame session or a cost-analysis exercise, when its core purpose is process improvement.

220
MCQeasy

A security analyst notices that an internal web server is receiving a large number of HTTP requests with unusually long and complex query strings, causing the server's CPU usage to spike. The requests appear to be targeting a search function. Which type of network incident is most likely occurring?

A.SQL injection
B.Cross-site scripting (XSS)
C.Directory traversal
D.HTTP flood
AnswerD

An HTTP flood is a type of denial-of-service attack where the attacker sends many HTTP requests to overwhelm the server. The requests often target resource-intensive functions like search, with complex query strings to maximize CPU usage. The observed CPU spike and high volume of requests to a search function are classic signs of an HTTP flood.

Why this answer

The scenario describes a high volume of HTTP requests with complex query strings targeting a search function, leading to CPU exhaustion. This matches an HTTP flood, a layer 7 denial-of-service attack that exploits resource-intensive operations. Other attacks like XSS, SQL injection, or directory traversal do not primarily cause CPU spikes through such requests.

Exam trap

The trap here is misinterpreting the complex query strings as an injection attack rather than recognizing the volumetric nature of a denial-of-service flood.

221
MCQeasy

During the 'Recovery' phase of the malware incident, what must be done to ensure the environment is safe before reconnecting the restored systems?

A.Perform a vulnerability scan
B.Delete all user profiles
C.Upgrade the OS to the latest version
D.Reformat all external hard drives
AnswerA

A vulnerability scan verifies that the restored systems contain no residual exploitable weaknesses, such as unpatched software the malware leveraged, before they are reconnected to production. This confirms the environment is safe and prevents immediate reinfection during recovery.

Why this answer

Vulnerability scanning confirms that the original entry points or vulnerabilities used by the malware have been patched or mitigated.

222
MCQhard

You suspect a DNS tunneling attack for data exfiltration. In your DNS server logs, which characteristic is the strongest indicator of a tunnel rather than standard recursive lookups?

A.High volume of A records
B.Requests for PTR records
C.Unusually long, high-entropy subdomains
D.Queries to root hints
AnswerC

DNS tunnelling encodes exfiltrated data into query names, producing subdomains far longer than legitimate hostnames and with high entropy from base64 or hex encoding. This pattern distinguishes tunnelling from normal recursive lookups, which resolve short, dictionary-like names.

Why this answer

DNS tunneling encodes data in the subdomain portion of DNS queries, and because DNS labels are limited to 63 characters, attackers pack them with long, random-looking (high-entropy) strings to maximize data throughput. Standard recursive lookups use short, human-readable domain names, so unusually long, high-entropy subdomains are the strongest indicator of a tunnel. Tools like iodine and dnscat2 produce exactly this pattern.

Exam trap

212-89 often tests whether candidates confuse volume-based indicators with content-based indicators — the trap is picking 'high volume of A records' when the real signal is the entropy and length of the subdomain labels.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because a high volume of A records is normal for busy recursive resolvers and CDNs — volume alone does not distinguish tunneling from legitimate traffic. Option B is wrong because PTR record requests are routine reverse-DNS lookups performed by mail servers, monitoring tools, and security scanners; they are not characteristic of tunneling. Option D is wrong because queries to root hints are a normal part of recursive resolution when a resolver starts cold or has an empty cache — they indicate standard DNS operation, not exfiltration.

223
MCQhard

An incident handler is documenting the timeline of a security breach. The handler discovers that system clocks on different servers are not synchronized. Which action should the handler take to ensure the timeline is accurate and defensible?

A.Normalize all timestamps to a common time zone and document the clock offsets.
B.Reconfigure all servers to use a network time protocol server and restart them.
C.Exclude timestamps from servers with unsynchronized clocks to avoid confusion.
D.Use the timestamps from the server with the most reliable clock as the single source of truth.
AnswerA

Normalizing to a common time zone (typically UTC) and recording each system's clock offset allows the handler to correlate events accurately and defend the timeline. This method acknowledges discrepancies and provides transparency, which is essential for forensic soundness and potential legal proceedings. It does not require altering original evidence, preserving integrity.

Why this answer

When system clocks are unsynchronized, the handler must account for offsets and normalize timestamps to a common reference, such as UTC, while documenting each system's deviation. This preserves the integrity of the original evidence and enables accurate correlation. Excluding data, trusting one clock, or reconfiguring systems during the investigation are all inappropriate and can compromise the timeline's defensibility.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that one clock can be trusted or that timestamps should be discarded, when the correct approach is to document offsets and normalize without altering evidence.

224
MCQhard

A user reports that Microsoft Word documents on a shared drive are suddenly opening with a prompt to enable macros, and a new file named '~$invoice.docx' appears in the same directory. Analysis shows the macro contains the string 'AutoOpen' and references a remote template URL. Which malware category and delivery technique best describe this incident?

A.Fileless malware delivered via PowerShell stager
B.Macro-based malware using remote template injection
C.Ransomware delivered through a malicious PDF reader exploit
D.Worm spreading via SMB by copying itself to shared directories
AnswerB

The AutoOpen macro combined with a remote template URL is the signature of remote template injection, where a benign-looking document loads a malicious template from an attacker-controlled server, delivering macro code without embedding it in the original file. The '~$' lock file confirms an active Word session and is consistent with this document-based delivery technique.

Why this answer

An AutoOpen macro that references a remote template URL is the hallmark of remote template injection, a document-based malware delivery technique. The macro executes when the document is opened, and the remote template pulls the malicious payload from an external server, evading static detection that only inspects the original file.

Exam trap

The trap here is classifying the incident as fileless malware because no obvious executable was dropped, when the AutoOpen macro and remote template URL are the defining artifacts of a document-based delivery technique.

225
MCQmedium

You are analyzing an incident where a user account is being used to exfiltrate data. What is the most immediate action to contain the account?

A.Delete the user account.
B.Delete the user's home directory.
C.Lock the user's computer.
D.Reset the user password and invalidate active sessions.
AnswerD

Resetting the password and revoking active sessions immediately terminates the attacker's authenticated access, satisfying the containment requirement. Password reset alone leaves stolen tokens valid, so session invalidation is essential to stop ongoing exfiltration through the compromised account.

Why this answer

Resetting the password and invalidating active sessions immediately cuts off the attacker's access while preserving the account and its data for forensic investigation. This contains the incident without destroying evidence, and it revokes any stolen session tokens or cookies the attacker may be using. It is the standard first containment step for a compromised account.

Exam trap

The trap is choosing the most destructive action (delete account) as 'containment' — candidates equate removal with containment, but forensics and session revocation require preserving the account while cutting off access.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because deleting the account destroys forensic evidence (logs, mailbox, files) and may violate retention policies; it also does not immediately terminate active sessions if tokens remain valid. Option B is wrong because deleting the home directory destroys user data and evidence, and it does nothing to stop the attacker if they are using a different session or cached credentials. Option C is wrong because locking the physical computer does not revoke the attacker's remote access — they may be connecting from elsewhere using stolen credentials or tokens, so the account itself must be secured.

Page 2

Page 3 of 5

Page 4

All pages