- A
A SOC 2 Type II report
A SOC 2 Type II report provides independent evidence that controls operated effectively over a period of time.
- B
A sales presentation from the vendor account team
Why wrong: Sales material can be helpful, but it is not independent proof of control design or operation.
- C
The vendor's public blog posts
Why wrong: Public marketing content does not validate security controls or contractual responsibilities.
- D
Contract clauses covering security responsibilities and incident notification
Contract terms should define who does what, including security duties and notification requirements.
- E
A screenshot of the login page
Why wrong: A login screenshot shows little about the vendor's overall security posture or legal obligations.
Question 275 of 1,152
Vendor Security Assessment Before Approval
This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of security program management and oversight. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
Before approving a new payroll SaaS provider, the security team wants independent evidence that the vendor's controls operated effectively during the last year and wants the contract to clearly define security responsibilities. Which two items should they request or review? Select two.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
A SOC 2 Type II report
A SOC 2 Type II report provides independent, audited evidence that a vendor's controls (e.g., security, availability, confidentiality) were operating effectively over a specified period (typically 6–12 months). This directly meets the requirement for independent evidence of control effectiveness over the last year, unlike a point-in-time assessment.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
A SOC 2 Type II report
Why this is correct
A SOC 2 Type II report provides independent evidence that controls operated effectively over a period of time.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
A sales presentation from the vendor account team
Why it's wrong here
Sales material can be helpful, but it is not independent proof of control design or operation.
- ✗
The vendor's public blog posts
Why it's wrong here
Public marketing content does not validate security controls or contractual responsibilities.
- ✓
Contract clauses covering security responsibilities and incident notification
Why this is correct
Contract terms should define who does what, including security duties and notification requirements.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
A screenshot of the login page
Why it's wrong here
A login screenshot shows little about the vendor's overall security posture or legal obligations.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates often confuse a SOC 2 Type I report (point-in-time design review) with a Type II report (operational effectiveness over time), or they mistakenly believe that marketing materials or user interface screenshots can substitute for independent audit evidence.
Trap categories for this question
Command / output trap
A login screenshot shows little about the vendor's overall security posture or legal obligations.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
SOC 2 Type II reports are governed by AICPA (American Institute of CPAs) standards and include a detailed description of the service organization's system, control objectives, and a qualified CPA's opinion on whether controls were suitably designed and operating effectively throughout the audit period. The report typically includes a description of tests of controls performed by the auditor, such as reviewing access logs, patch management records, and incident response procedures. In a real-world scenario, a SOC 2 Type II report might reveal that a vendor's encryption key rotation policy was not consistently applied, which would be critical for a payroll SaaS handling sensitive PII and financial data.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A SOC analyst notices unusual lateral movement in the network at 2 AM. The IR playbook dictates: identify and contain (isolate the affected machine), then eradicate (remove the malware), then recover (restore from backup), then document. Skipping containment before eradication risks the attacker regaining access. Questions like this test the sequence and rationale of incident response phases.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Security Program Management and Oversight — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Security Program Management and Oversight practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All SY0-701 questions
1,152 questions across all exam domains
- →
Security+ SY0-701 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
SY0-701 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related SY0-701 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
General Security Concepts practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to General Security Concepts.
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations.
Security Architecture practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Architecture.
Security Operations practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Operations.
Security Program Management and Oversight practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security Program Management and Oversight.
Security+ social engineering questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ social engineering questions.
Security+ cryptography practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ cryptography.
Security+ IAM questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ IAM questions.
Security+ risk management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ risk management questions.
Security+ incident response questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ incident response questions.
Security+ malware questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ malware questions.
Security+ vulnerability management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ vulnerability management questions.
Practice this exam
Start a free SY0-701 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SY0-701 question test?
Security Program Management and Oversight — This question tests Security Program Management and Oversight — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: A SOC 2 Type II report — A SOC 2 Type II report provides independent, audited evidence that a vendor's controls (e.g., security, availability, confidentiality) were operating effectively over a specified period (typically 6–12 months). This directly meets the requirement for independent evidence of control effectiveness over the last year, unlike a point-in-time assessment.
What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
3 more ways this is tested on SY0-701
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. Based on the exhibit, what is the best next request before approving the vendor?
hard- A.Ask for a fresh marketing brochure that describes the vendor's security controls in detail.
- B.Accept the internal penetration test summary because it proves the controls were tested recently.
- C.Request only the shared responsibility matrix again, since it covers all security responsibilities.
- ✓ D.Request a current SOC 2 Type II report or equivalent independent operating-effectiveness attestation.
Why D: Option D is correct because a SOC 2 Type II report provides an independent, third-party attestation of the effectiveness of a vendor's security controls over a period of time (typically 6–12 months). This is the most reliable evidence for verifying that the vendor's operational security controls are working as intended, which is critical before approving a vendor. The internal penetration test summary (Option B) lacks independence and may not cover all relevant controls, while a marketing brochure (Option A) is not a verifiable audit artifact. The shared responsibility matrix (Option C) defines roles but does not attest to control effectiveness.
Variation 2. Based on the exhibit, what should the organization do before approving this SaaS vendor to process employee HR records?
medium- A.Approve the vendor now because admin MFA is enabled and the deadline is urgent.
- B.Request a formal risk acceptance memo and sign the contract without additional review.
- ✓ C.Require a security addendum and evidence review before onboarding, including notification timelines, deletion terms, subprocessors, and independent testing.
- D.Move the HR data into the vendor environment first and complete the review after production cutover.
Why C: Option C is correct because before processing sensitive employee HR records, the organization must ensure the SaaS vendor meets security and compliance requirements. This includes reviewing contractual terms like notification timelines, data deletion policies, subprocessor usage, and independent testing evidence (e.g., SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 certification). Without these, the organization cannot verify the vendor's security posture or contractual obligations, which is critical for protecting PII and meeting regulatory requirements like GDPR or HIPAA.
Variation 3. Based on the exhibit, what should the security team add before approving the vendor's requested change?
hard- A.A broader employee awareness training requirement for the vendor's staff.
- ✓ B.A contract clause requiring prior written approval for new subprocessors and flow-down security obligations.
- C.A larger cyber insurance policy to cover possible losses if the vendor is breached.
- D.A request for the vendor to send monthly screenshots of its backup jobs.
Why B: The exhibit shows the vendor requesting a change to use a new subprocessor for data storage. The security team must ensure that the vendor's contract includes a clause requiring prior written approval for new subprocessors and that security obligations flow down to them. This directly addresses the risk of unauthorized data handling by third parties, which is a key concern in vendor risk management.
Keep practising
More SY0-701 practice questions
- An HR analyst must send a salary file to an external auditor. The auditor only needs names, departments, and salary tota…
- An investigator receives a suspect laptop drive that may be used in court. Which approach best supports a forensically s…
- An investigator must collect data from a suspected insider-threat laptop so the evidence could be used in an HR and lega…
- An NDR tool shows a production web server sending small, periodic DNS queries to random-looking subdomains under a domai…
- An investigator needs to make a forensic image of a suspect laptop without changing the original drive contents. Which t…
- An operations team manages Linux servers over SSH. The security team wants to stop direct management access from employe…
Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026
This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.