Question 1,128 of 1,152
General Security ConceptsmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

SY0-701 General Security Concepts Practice Question

This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of general security concepts. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A financial institution updates its access control policy to require that two different system administrators must approve and execute any changes to the core transaction processing database. Which security principle is this practice primarily designed to enforce?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Separation of duties

Requiring two different system administrators to approve and execute changes to the core transaction processing database enforces separation of duties. This principle ensures that no single individual has the authority to perform both the approval and execution steps, reducing the risk of fraud, error, or unauthorized modifications. In a financial institution, this is critical for maintaining the integrity of transaction data and complying with regulatory standards like SOX or PCI DSS.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Defense in depth

    Why it's wrong here

    Defense in depth refers to layering multiple security controls (e.g., firewalls, antivirus, encryption). While this policy adds a layer of control, its primary purpose is not layering but enforcing a division of authority.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A question asks: 'An organization implements firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and antivirus software to protect its network. Which security principle is this an example of?' Here, defense in depth would be correct because multiple layers of defense are used.

  • Separation of duties

    Why this is correct

    Correct. Separation of duties ensures that no single person has exclusive authority over critical functions. By splitting approval and execution between two administrators, the risk of unauthorized or malicious changes is significantly reduced.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Least privilege

    Why it's wrong here

    Least privilege limits users to only the permissions they need to perform their job. This policy does not necessarily reduce permissions; it divides the steps required to make a change among multiple people.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A question describing a policy where a database administrator is granted only the specific permissions needed to perform their job functions, and no additional access, would make 'Least privilege' the correct answer.

  • Need to know

    Why it's wrong here

    Need to know restricts access to sensitive data based on whether it is required for a specific job function. The described policy governs actions (approving and executing changes) rather than data access.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A question asks: 'A security analyst is granted access to a database only after demonstrating a legitimate business requirement for specific records. Which principle is being enforced?' Here, need-to-know would be correct because access is limited to information necessary for the job.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The SY0-701 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

Separation of dutiesCorrect answer

Why this is correct

Correct. Separation of duties ensures that no single person has exclusive authority over critical functions. By splitting approval and execution between two administrators, the risk of unauthorized or malicious changes is significantly reduced.

Defense in depthWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Defense in depth is a layered security approach using multiple controls, but the question specifically describes a dual-approval process for changes, which directly enforces separation of duties, not defense in depth.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A question asks: 'An organization implements firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and antivirus software to protect its network. Which security principle is this an example of?' Here, defense in depth would be correct because multiple layers of defense are used.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse the concept of multiple controls (defense in depth) with the dual-approval process, thinking that requiring two administrators is an additional layer of security, but it is actually a separation of duties mechanism.

Least privilegeWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

The practice requires two administrators to approve and execute changes, which enforces separation of duties, not least privilege. Least privilege restricts permissions to the minimum necessary, but does not inherently require dual approval.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A question describing a policy where a database administrator is granted only the specific permissions needed to perform their job functions, and no additional access, would make 'Least privilege' the correct answer.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse the concept of limiting access (least privilege) with the procedural control of requiring multiple approvals, as both aim to reduce risk.

Need to knowWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

The need-to-know principle restricts access to information based on job necessity, but the question describes a process requiring two administrators to approve changes, which is about dividing responsibilities, not limiting information access.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A question asks: 'A security analyst is granted access to a database only after demonstrating a legitimate business requirement for specific records. Which principle is being enforced?' Here, need-to-know would be correct because access is limited to information necessary for the job.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse need-to-know with separation of duties because both involve restricting actions, but need-to-know focuses on information access, not task approval workflows.

Analysis generated from the official SY0-701blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates confuse separation of duties with least privilege, but least privilege focuses on limiting permissions per role, while separation of duties divides a critical process across multiple roles to prevent conflicts of interest.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Separation of duties is often implemented using role-based access control (RBAC) with distinct roles such as 'Change Approver' and 'Change Executor,' enforced by access control lists (ACLs) or database-level permissions. In a real-world scenario, a database management system (DBMS) like Oracle or SQL Server can use audit trails and stored procedures to log each admin's actions, ensuring non-repudiation and compliance with frameworks like NIST SP 800-53. This prevents a single compromised account from making unauthorized changes to sensitive financial records.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SY0-701 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

General Security Concepts — This question tests General Security Concepts — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Separation of duties — Requiring two different system administrators to approve and execute changes to the core transaction processing database enforces separation of duties. This principle ensures that no single individual has the authority to perform both the approval and execution steps, reducing the risk of fraud, error, or unauthorized modifications. In a financial institution, this is critical for maintaining the integrity of transaction data and complying with regulatory standards like SOX or PCI DSS.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More SY0-701 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.