mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A financial institution updates its access control policy to require that two different system administrators must approve and execute any changes to the core transaction processing database. Which security principle is this practice primarily designed to enforce?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A financial institution updates its access control policy to require that two different system administrators must approve and execute any changes to the core transaction processing database. Which security principle is this practice primarily designed to enforce?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Defense in depth

Defense in depth refers to layering multiple security controls (e.g., firewalls, antivirus, encryption). While this policy adds a layer of control, its primary purpose is not layering but enforcing a division of authority.

B

Best answer

Separation of duties

Correct. Separation of duties ensures that no single person has exclusive authority over critical functions. By splitting approval and execution between two administrators, the risk of unauthorized or malicious changes is significantly reduced.

C

Distractor review

Least privilege

Least privilege limits users to only the permissions they need to perform their job. This policy does not necessarily reduce permissions; it divides the steps required to make a change among multiple people.

D

Distractor review

Need to know

Need to know restricts access to sensitive data based on whether it is required for a specific job function. The described policy governs actions (approving and executing changes) rather than data access.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: authentication is not authorization

Logging in proves the user can authenticate. It does not automatically mean the user is allowed to enter privileged or configuration mode. Watch for AAA authorization, privilege level and command authorization details.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

This kind of question is testing the difference between identity and permission. A user may successfully log in to a router because authentication is working, but still fail to enter configuration mode because authorization is missing, misconfigured or mapped to a lower privilege level.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Authentication checks who the user is.
  • Authorization controls what the user is allowed to do after login.
  • Privilege levels affect access to EXEC and configuration commands.
  • AAA, TACACS+ and RADIUS can separate login success from command access.

TExam Day Tips

  • Do not assume successful login means full administrative access.
  • Look for words such as cannot enter configuration mode, privilege level, authorization or command access.
  • Separate login problems from permission problems before choosing the answer.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Authentication checks who the user is.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Separation of duties — Requiring two different administrators to approve and execute changes prevents any single individual from having unchecked control over critical operations. This directly supports the separation of duties principle, which reduces the risk of fraud, errors, or malicious activity by dividing responsibilities among multiple people.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.