Question 1,206 of 1,819
Switching and Network AccesshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is a native VLAN mismatch, specifically where VLAN 30 is the native VLAN on one switch but not the other. This is correct because on an 802.1Q trunk, the native VLAN carries traffic without an 802.1Q tag; when the native VLAN is mismatched, frames from VLAN 30 on one switch arrive untagged and are placed into the other switch’s configured native VLAN—say VLAN 1—instead of VLAN 30, breaking communication for that specific VLAN. On the CCNA 200-301 v2 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of trunking behavior and the common trap that a native VLAN mismatch only disrupts traffic for the mismatched native VLAN, while all other tagged VLANs (like 10 and 20) work fine. A key memory tip: “Untagged frames follow the native VLAN—if they don’t match, they land in the wrong VLAN.”

CCNA Switching and Network Access Practice Question

This 200-301 practice question tests your understanding of switching and network access. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

An administrator notices that hosts in VLAN 30 on SW1 cannot communicate with hosts in VLAN 30 on SW2, even though both switches are connected via an 802.1Q trunk. Traffic for VLANs 10 and 20 passes without issues across the same trunk. The trunk is configured to allow all VLANs, and the allowed VLAN list explicitly includes VLAN 30. What is the most likely cause of the problem?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "most likely"

    Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Open the full VLAN trunking answer →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The native VLAN is mismatched between SW1 and SW2, and VLAN 30 is the native VLAN on one side.

The most likely cause is a native VLAN mismatch. When the native VLAN is mismatched on an 802.1Q trunk, traffic for the native VLAN is not tagged, so frames from VLAN 30 on one switch are received as untagged frames on the other switch and placed into the switch's configured native VLAN. If the native VLAN on one side is VLAN 30 and on the other side is a different VLAN (e.g., VLAN 1), the hosts in VLAN 30 cannot communicate because the frames are interpreted as belonging to different VLANs. Traffic for VLANs 10 and 20 passes because they are not the native VLAN and are properly tagged.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The native VLAN is mismatched between SW1 and SW2, and VLAN 30 is the native VLAN on one side.

    Why this is correct

    A native VLAN mismatch causes one switch to send untagged frames for VLAN 30 while the other expects tagged frames, so the receiving switch cannot associate the untagged traffic with VLAN 30, leading to a communication failure only for that VLAN.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • The trunk encapsulation is set to ISL on one switch and 802.1Q on the other.

    Why it's wrong here

    A trunk with mismatched encapsulations would fail to come up entirely for all VLANs, not selectively for one VLAN. Modern Cisco switches auto-negotiate trunk encapsulation, making this scenario unlikely.

  • Spanning Tree Protocol has placed VLAN 30 in a blocking state on the trunk link.

    Why it's wrong here

    STP operates per VLAN, but there is no inherent reason for STP to block only one VLAN while others forward, especially without a topology change. The scenario gives no indication of a loop or STP change.

  • The switched virtual interface (SVI) for VLAN 30 on SW1 is administratively down.

    Why it's wrong here

    SVIs are used for inter-VLAN routing, not for bridging traffic within the same VLAN across a trunk. Disabling the SVI does not affect Layer 2 forwarding of VLAN 30 frames between switches.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The 200-301 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

The native VLAN is mismatched between SW1 and SW2, and VLAN 30 is the native VLAN on one side.Correct answer

Why this is correct

A native VLAN mismatch causes one switch to send untagged frames for VLAN 30 while the other expects tagged frames, so the receiving switch cannot associate the untagged traffic with VLAN 30, leading to a communication failure only for that VLAN.

The trunk encapsulation is set to ISL on one switch and 802.1Q on the other.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

This would cause a complete trunk failure, not a failure limited to a single VLAN.

Spanning Tree Protocol has placed VLAN 30 in a blocking state on the trunk link.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

STP would not randomly block one VLAN on a point-to-point trunk while the rest are forwarding; this is not a typical behavior.

The switched virtual interface (SVI) for VLAN 30 on SW1 is administratively down.Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Layer 2 switching within the same VLAN does not require an SVI; an SVI is only needed for routing between VLANs or management.

Analysis generated from the official 200-301blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Cisco often tests the native VLAN mismatch scenario by describing a trunk that works for most VLANs but fails for one specific VLAN, leading candidates to incorrectly suspect STP blocking or SVI issues instead of recognizing the native VLAN mismatch.

Trap categories for this question

  • Scenario analysis trap

    A trunk with mismatched encapsulations would fail to come up entirely for all VLANs, not selectively for one VLAN. Modern Cisco switches auto-negotiate trunk encapsulation, making this scenario unlikely.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

In 802.1Q trunking, the native VLAN (default VLAN 1) is the only VLAN whose frames are sent untagged across the trunk. If the native VLAN is mismatched, frames from the native VLAN on one switch are received as untagged frames on the other switch and are mapped to that switch's native VLAN, causing a VLAN mismatch. This is a common misconfiguration that can be verified with the 'show interfaces trunk' command, which displays the native VLAN on each side; the native VLAN must match on both ends for proper communication.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A help-desk technician troubleshoots why a newly connected PC cannot reach shared printers on the same floor. The cable is good, the switch port is active, but the PC is in VLAN 20 and the printers are in VLAN 10. The uplink trunk only allows VLAN 10. A trunk being up does not mean every VLAN crosses it.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related 200-301 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 200-301 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 200-301 question test?

Switching and Network Access — This question tests Switching and Network Access — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The native VLAN is mismatched between SW1 and SW2, and VLAN 30 is the native VLAN on one side. — The most likely cause is a native VLAN mismatch. When the native VLAN is mismatched on an 802.1Q trunk, traffic for the native VLAN is not tagged, so frames from VLAN 30 on one switch are received as untagged frames on the other switch and placed into the switch's configured native VLAN. If the native VLAN on one side is VLAN 30 and on the other side is a different VLAN (e.g., VLAN 1), the hosts in VLAN 30 cannot communicate because the frames are interpreted as belonging to different VLANs. Traffic for VLANs 10 and 20 passes because they are not the native VLAN and are properly tagged.

What should I do if I get this 200-301 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 25, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 200-301 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-301 exam.