Courseiva
People — Leading ProjectseasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

PMP People — Leading Projects Practice Question

Your agile team has been working remotely for the past three months. You notice that sprint velocity has dropped significantly over the last two sprints. Team members seem disengaged during daily stand-ups and collaboration has decreased. What should you do FIRST?

⚠ Common exam trap

Candidates often confuse a symptom (low velocity) with a process or resource problem, leading them to choose tooling or escalation options, when the correct first step is to investigate the human and team dynamics as a servant leader.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Schedule virtual team-building activities and one-on-one check-ins to understand concerns

The first step in addressing a drop in velocity and team disengagement is to understand the root cause through direct communication. As a servant leader, you should schedule virtual team-building activities and one-on-one check-ins to uncover concerns such as burnout, isolation, or unclear expectations, which aligns with the PMI People domain of leading projects. This approach fosters psychological safety and collaboration, which are essential for remote agile teams.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Implement a new project management tool to track tasks more closely

    Why it's wrong here

    Implementing a new project management tool primarily focuses on task tracking and process enforcement, which may not address the underlying human-centric issues causing a velocity drop in a remote agile team. A new tool could introduce additional overhead, require training, and potentially exacerbate existing problems related to team engagement, communication, or morale, rather than resolving them. Agile principles emphasize people and interactions over processes and tools, making a human-centric approach more appropriate first.

  • Ask the team to work longer hours to make up for lost velocity

    Why it's wrong here

    Demanding longer working hours to compensate for a velocity drop is a counterproductive and unsustainable approach in agile environments. This tactic often leads to increased stress, reduced morale, and severe team burnout, which further diminishes productivity, quality, and long-term team health. Agile values sustainable pace and team well-being, recognizing that an overworked team is less innovative, collaborative, and ultimately less effective.

  • Report the velocity drop to the sponsor and ask for more resources

    Why it's wrong here

    Reporting a velocity drop to the sponsor and immediately requesting more resources without first understanding the root cause is a reactive and premature escalation. As an agile team, the initial responsibility is to investigate internal factors, conduct a root cause analysis, and attempt to self-organize solutions to identified impediments. Escalating without data or a clear understanding of the problem demonstrates a lack of proactive problem-solving and can erode stakeholder trust in the team's ability to manage its own challenges.

  • Schedule virtual team-building activities and one-on-one check-ins to understand concerns

    Why this is correct

    Scheduling virtual team-building activities and one-on-one check-ins is the most appropriate initial action because it directly addresses potential human-centric issues common in remote agile teams. This approach allows for inspection of team dynamics, identifies individual concerns or blockers, and fosters psychological safety, which are critical for improving communication, collaboration, and overall team cohesion. Understanding the root causes of the velocity drop through direct team engagement is essential for effective problem-solving and adaptation, aligning with agile principles of inspect and adapt.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every PMP question from scratch — 800 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.