Courseiva
People — Leading ProjectsmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

PMP People — Leading Projects Practice Question

You are leading a global software development project with team members in three different time zones. Recently, two senior developers from different locations have been in conflict over the design approach for a critical component. The conflict has started to affect team morale and productivity. What should you do FIRST?

⚠ Common exam trap

Many candidates choose Option B (forcing) because it appears efficient, but PMI prioritizes collaborative resolution to maintain team cohesion and long-term project success, even if it takes more time initially.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Schedule a meeting with both developers to discuss the issue and find a mutually agreeable solution.

As the project manager, your first responsibility is to address interpersonal conflicts directly and collaboratively. Scheduling a meeting with both developers to discuss the issue and find a mutually agreeable solution aligns with the PMI's emphasis on conflict resolution techniques like 'collaborating/problem-solving,' which seeks a win-win outcome. This approach preserves team morale and productivity by involving the stakeholders in the decision, rather than imposing a solution or avoiding the problem.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Schedule a meeting with both developers to discuss the issue and find a mutually agreeable solution.

    Why this is correct

    This option exemplifies the "collaborate/problem-solve" conflict resolution technique, which is highly recommended in project management. By facilitating a direct meeting, the project manager enables open communication, encourages mutual understanding of perspectives, and empowers the team members to jointly develop a sustainable solution. This approach fosters team cohesion and ensures higher commitment to the agreed-upon design, aligning with effective stakeholder engagement.

  • Decide on the design approach yourself to end the conflict quickly.

    Why it's wrong here

    This approach represents the "forcing" or "directing" conflict resolution technique, which, while quick, is generally detrimental to team morale and long-term project success. Imposing a solution without team input often fails to address the root causes of the disagreement, leading to resentment, reduced ownership, and potential re-emergence of the conflict later. It undermines the team's problem-solving capabilities and can damage the project manager's relationship with the team.

  • Escalate the issue to the sponsors and ask them to intervene.

    Why it's wrong here

    Escalating the issue to project sponsors prematurely is an inappropriate action for a project manager, as it abdicates the PM's responsibility for team conflict resolution. Sponsors are typically involved in strategic decisions and high-level impediments, not routine team disagreements. Such an action can signal a lack of leadership capability, consume valuable sponsor time, and potentially erode the team's trust in the project manager's ability to manage internal issues effectively.

  • Reassign the developers to different tasks to avoid further conflict.

    Why it's wrong here

    Reassigning developers to different tasks is an "avoiding" or "withdrawing" conflict resolution technique, which merely postpones or sidesteps the core issue rather than resolving it. This approach fails to address the underlying design disagreement, leaving it unresolved and potentially resurfacing in other forms or future projects. Furthermore, it can lead to inefficient resource allocation and may signal to the team that conflicts are to be evaded, rather than constructively managed, hindering team growth.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every PMP question from scratch — 800 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.