An organization has a change that must be implemented immediately to prevent a major financial loss. According to ITIL 4, what type of change is this?
Emergency changes are specifically designed for changes that must be implemented as soon as possible, typically to resolve an incident or implement a critical security patch, where delaying the change would cause significant business impact or risk. They bypass some steps of the normal change process, such as full assessment and authorization, to expedite implementation, with authorization often delegated or performed retrospectively.
Why this answer
According to ITIL 4, an emergency change is a change that must be implemented as soon as possible to resolve an incident or prevent a major financial loss. This type of change bypasses the normal change advisory board (CAB) process and follows a separate, expedited procedure to minimize risk while ensuring speed.
Exam trap
The trap here is that candidates confuse 'urgent' with 'standard' or 'normal,' forgetting that ITIL 4 explicitly defines emergency changes for situations requiring immediate implementation to avoid major financial or operational impact.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because a service request is a pre-defined, low-risk request from a user (e.g., password reset or access grant), not an urgent change to prevent financial loss. Option C is wrong because a standard change is a pre-approved, low-risk change that follows a documented procedure (e.g., patching a known vulnerability), not an immediate response to a critical threat. Option D is wrong because a normal change goes through the full change management lifecycle, including CAB assessment and scheduling, which is too slow for an immediate financial loss prevention scenario.