An IT team decides to reduce the number of steps in a change approval process to speed up delivery. Which guiding principle are they applying?
Reducing unnecessary steps aligns with keeping processes simple.
Why this answer
By reducing the number of steps in a change approval process, the team is eliminating unnecessary complexity and bureaucracy. This directly aligns with the 'Keep it simple and practical' guiding principle, which advocates for minimizing process overhead to achieve outcomes efficiently. The focus is on streamlining the workflow itself, not on automation or iterative feedback.
Exam trap
The trap here is that candidates often confuse 'reducing steps' with 'automation' (Option B), but the question explicitly states they are reducing the number of steps, not automating the existing ones, which is a key distinction in ITIL 4's guidance on simplification before automation.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because 'Progress iteratively with feedback' focuses on delivering value in small increments and using feedback to adjust, not on simplifying an existing process by removing steps. Option B is wrong because 'Optimise and automate' would apply if the team were using technology to speed up the existing steps (e.g., automated approvals), but here they are removing steps entirely, which is simplification before optimization. Option C is wrong because 'Start where you are' means understanding the current state before making changes, but the question describes the action taken (reducing steps), not the initial assessment phase.