- A
Run Windows Update to fix vulnerabilities.
Why wrong: Not a forensic collection method.
- B
Reboot the system and boot from a forensic USB drive.
Why wrong: Rebooting destroys volatile data.
- C
Use FTK Imager to create a forensically sound image of the hard drive.
Why wrong: This is done after shutdown, not during live incident.
- D
Run KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect artifacts.
KAPE collects forensic artifacts without altering the system.
- E
Take a memory dump using DumpIt or similar tool.
Memory dump captures running processes and network connections.
Question 1,016 of 1,639
Two Valid Methods to Collect Forensic Evidence from a Compromised Windows Endpoint
This SC-200 practice question tests your understanding of respond to security incidents. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
Which TWO are valid methods to collect forensic evidence from a compromised Windows endpoint during an incident? (Choose TWO.)
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Run KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect artifacts.
KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) is a purpose-built tool for collecting and parsing forensic artifacts from live Windows endpoints during incident response. It efficiently gathers critical evidence such as prefetch files, registry hives, event logs, and browser history without altering the system state, making it a valid method for forensic collection.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Run Windows Update to fix vulnerabilities.
Why it's wrong here
Not a forensic collection method.
- ✗
Reboot the system and boot from a forensic USB drive.
Why it's wrong here
Rebooting destroys volatile data.
- ✗
Use FTK Imager to create a forensically sound image of the hard drive.
Why it's wrong here
This is done after shutdown, not during live incident.
- ✓
Run KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect artifacts.
Why this is correct
KAPE collects forensic artifacts without altering the system.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✓
Take a memory dump using DumpIt or similar tool.
Why this is correct
Memory dump captures running processes and network connections.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The SC-200 exam often tests the distinction between live forensic collection tools (like KAPE and DumpIt) and traditional forensic imaging tools (like FTK Imager) that require a dead-box approach, leading candidates to incorrectly select FTK Imager for live collection.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
KAPE operates by executing targeted collection modules that copy artifacts from predefined locations (e.g., %SystemRoot%\Prefetch, %SystemRoot%\System32\config) without mounting the disk in a write-blocked manner, relying on the operating system's own read access. DumpIt, part of the Comae Toolkit, uses the Windows Memory Dump API to capture a raw memory image (e.g., .raw or .dmp) from kernel space, preserving volatile data like running processes and network connections. In real-world scenarios, combining KAPE for disk artifacts with DumpIt for memory provides a comprehensive forensic snapshot while minimizing system alteration.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A cloud solutions architect for a retail company is evaluating services for a new workload. The correct answer here reflects best practice for the specific scenario described — not a general cloud recommendation. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Cloud exam questions reward reading the constraint carefully: the same technology can be right or wrong depending on the use case.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Respond to security incidents — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Respond to security incidents practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All SC-200 questions
1,639 questions across all exam domains
- →
Microsoft Security Operations Analyst SC-200 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
SC-200 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related SC-200 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Manage a security operations environment practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Manage a security operations environment.
Respond to security incidents practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Respond to security incidents.
Perform threat hunting practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Perform threat hunting.
Mitigate threats using Microsoft Defender XDR practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Mitigate threats using Microsoft Defender XDR.
Mitigate threats using Microsoft Defender for Cloud practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Mitigate threats using Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
Mitigate threats using Microsoft Sentinel practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to Mitigate threats using Microsoft Sentinel.
SC-200 fundamentals practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to SC-200 fundamentals.
SC-200 scenario practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to SC-200 scenario.
SC-200 troubleshooting practice questions
Practise SC-200 questions linked to SC-200 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free SC-200 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SC-200 question test?
Respond to security incidents — This question tests Respond to security incidents — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Run KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect artifacts. — KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) is a purpose-built tool for collecting and parsing forensic artifacts from live Windows endpoints during incident response. It efficiently gathers critical evidence such as prefetch files, registry hives, event logs, and browser history without altering the system state, making it a valid method for forensic collection.
What should I do if I get this SC-200 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Keep practising
More SC-200 practice questions
- Which TWO are valid sources of evidence in a Microsoft Sentinel incident? (Choose two.)
- An organization uses Microsoft 365 Defender. During an incident, the analyst wants to automatically isolate a compromise…
- Which THREE steps are part of the incident response process when using Microsoft Sentinel?
- Refer to the exhibit. You are reviewing a Microsoft Sentinel scheduled analytics rule configured as above. An incident w…
- A security analyst is preparing to use a Jupyter notebook for threat hunting in Microsoft Sentinel. Which of the followi…
- You are investigating a ransomware incident in Microsoft Sentinel. The incident contains multiple alerts. You need to gr…
Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026
This SC-200 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-200 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.